tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-174983032024-03-14T14:17:57.290+08:00The Body Friendly Zen CookbookFor All Things Zen And Friendly.teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.comBlogger304125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-30543555262233994682024-03-09T11:07:00.010+08:002024-03-09T16:00:41.394+08:00Criminal Supermarkets<img align="left" height="48" src="https://ohaicorona.com/images/ZEN_sml.png" width="48" />
<h4 style="text-align: left;">Supermarkets justifying record profits because of the many employees they have is bullshit. </h4>
<h1 style="text-align: left;">Supermarkets are "criminal."</h1><p>It's not just me saying it, <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/03/07/supermarket-inquiry" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">it's more or less official now</a>. This post has had to be updated before it was even scheduled. The original post was everything below from the heading "<b>Profit(eering)</b>" to the "<b>And Now - UPDATED:</b>" heading further down. The post has also gone from "scheduled" to "for immediate release" status. </p><p>I urge you to share this everywhere, share it often, and discuss it widely if you want food justice for Australians. (<i>And Americans - unless your goverment stops a few "strategic mergers" from taking place, you'll be in this effective duopoly situation soon too - share the hell out of it everywhere!</i>) Please read all the way down to the "<b>Call To Action</b>" and take action. Australians need the supermarkets to be reined in and punished. </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Profit (and profiteering)</h2><p>They do know, don't they, that profit is what's left AFTER all outgoings have been paid, and therefore blaming employee payrolls is total bullshit? They HAVE record profits. AFTER having paid all outgoings. All outgoings includes wages last time I looked it up.</p>
<p>That means they've paid all their employees fairly - <b><i><a href="https://7news.com.au/business/coles-admits-to-another-25-million-in-underpaid-wages-as-scandal-bill-soars-c-10851883" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">HAVEN'T</a> <span style="color: white;">.</span> <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace/woolworths-faces-more-than-1000-criminal-charges-over-unpaid-leave-20230724-p5dqrr.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">THEY</a>?</i></b> - and then they STILL have this mountain of money left over. The wages aren't paid for out of the profit, they're paid before they declare the profit. Either that, or they're lying right in our faces and hoping none of us has ever done maths.</p>
<p>And saying people are just trying save - when those people are still earning the same or more than last year but are having to choose the cheaper generic versions - that seems to me to say that it's more likely that the price on the original thing they wanted HAS gone up. Really. They could afford it last year and the years before, their budgets are still broadly the same; - but this year that nice ham is out of their price range. In plain terms, that nice ham has almost doubled in real price. </p>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">What Can We Do?</h3>
<p>Take the stores back. If you see anyone flogging a pack of mince - no. No, you didn't see anything. If they'd kept their staffing levels up to the point where it made their profits merely reasonable rather than rapacious and greedy, they could have a staff member standing alongside every customer and checking their baskets out for them to prevent this. </p><p>In fact, they could have re-installed much cheaper and simpler things called "staffed checkouts" - as they had 20 years ago. Because you know what? Back then "stock shrinkage" was far lower than it is now with self-checkout. It's been a stupid, profit-motivated, unremitting and stinking stuff-up that the supermarkets made and we (the customers) have been paying for ever since. </p>
<p>So, if you have a docket from last year, find the items you bought back then on the shelves today and write the old price on their price stickers with a fine felt tip marker. Be careful not to mess up the barcode though, because we don't want to cause any hassle. Also don't cover their price, just add the old price you paid and the date you paid that price. We just want other shoppers to see the price increases and decide for themselves if they want to buy that item there or perhaps just find another store where the two label amounts are closer together... </p><p>Or print yourself a bunch of labels and take them with you to put near label holders - alongside the current price label, not covering it. Again, it's just nice to let other customers know how it's apparently us that need to change our budgets because of the rampant price gouges, rather than that the supermarkets make less profit so we can afford that item.</p><p>Print some nice notes or posters explaining that this doubling of some prices in less than four years is not acceptable, and put them near the worst rip-off items in the store. Nothing rude, just facts. Other people need to know, so that they can decide if they want to be ripped off or treated fairly. </p><p>Get creative. Drive home that we are tired of being bent over for our wallets. And maybe someone that sees one of your posters will also start taking action. And the ripples will spread.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Retrospect</h3><p>This whole situation happened because way back when, when someone decided that Australia didn't need competition in the supermarket sector, the "free market will take care of it." And so chains like IGA, ALDI, Costco, and a whole swag of other potential competitors weren't really welcomed into the market in Australia despite the healthy competition they'd have generated, back when it could have made a difference.</p><p>America - for once - is following us down the chute as they try to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/26/kroger-albertsons-grocery-merger-blocked-ftc" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">prevent a similar duopoly situation</a> occurring there. You can see how our stupidity and docility in allowing a duopoly to get so stongly established and so deeply embedded has emboldened the same behaviour in other countries. It's time we showed them the other side of the coin. And </p>
<p>But bear in mind - no matter where it is, <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/02/28/supermarket-australia-us" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a duopoly</a> is exactly the same thing as a monopoly with two trading names. It was shown in interviews and questions that our two supermarkets actually do tacitly fix prices between them, develop the same anti-competitive practices between them to keep other players out, and work the same - let's call them what they are, scams - on their victi-... their customers. When more than two similar corporate bodies collude and collaborate between them to fix prices and scam their customers, the term is "a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Cartel</a>." We have those in Australia and all over the planet, too. But that's for another article.</p><p>In none of those scenarios are the customer's interests considered. Only our wallets.</p><p>So Keep The Bastards Honest, get activated and irritated, and let them know we won't take their thievery for much longer. Every store manager has a name and an address, write them a nice letter explaining why you think they should be working for the sake of their customers more than their shareholders. Oh and of course those upstream people also have names and addresses - write them a nice letter too. But do write letters, posters, labels, stickers. (<i>Oh, and I forgot to mention that they have email addresses too...</i>)</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">And Now - UPDATED:</h2><p style="text-align: left;">The latest senate enquiry into the conduct of the supermarket duopoly robbing Australian consumers to within an inch of their lives has labelled their behaviour as "criminal." Colour me unsurprised because <i style="font-weight: bold;">this is what I've been saying for over a decade already</i>. I'll hand you the lede now:</p><p style="text-align: left;"></p><blockquote><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;">"A senate inquiry into supermarket pricing has heard that people are turning to dumpster diving and stealing to combat the cost of living.</span></p><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;">The first of three hearings, held in Hobart on Thursday, also saw the conduct of Coles and Woolworths labelled “criminal”." -- <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/03/07/supermarket-inquiry" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/03/07/supermarket-inquiry</a> </span></p></blockquote><p style="text-align: left;"></p><p style="text-align: left;">People are scrounging from dumpsters items that the supermarkets would rather throw away (<i>showing very clearly that their profits are wayyyyy too high, otherwise they'd at leats make an effort to sales-price these items and make <b>some</b> money from them</i>) and some are turning to petty crime. </p><p style="text-align: left;">What I may not have seen stressed enough in articles about this deplorable greed and rapaciousness the supermarkets are displaying is: if you saw someone steal an item at the self-checkout - NO! No, you did not see anything at all. Their actions didn't cause the supermarkets to record record billion-dollar profits, should indeed have caused the supermarkets some losses, and yet - lo! - for they STILL make record profits despite throwing out a significant proportion of perfectly within-code products, despite stock shrinkage being on the rise.</p><h4 style="text-align: center;">They Are Making Far More Than A Fair Profit, They Are Profiteering At YOUR Expense!</h4><p style="text-align: left;">Remind everyone - once more, with feeling - Keep The Bastards Honest. <b><i>Especially </i></b>remind your local MPs and Ministers that every store manager has a name and an address, every CEO and COO and CFO too. Ask your Minister to write to them on your behalf, perhaps, or to forward your concerns via a new item of legislation being tabled or some such governmental magic. Because - and you should feel free to let those government persons know this - you will definitely support them in the next local election, by-election, and State or Federal election, and you just don't know if that would be the case if they didn't act... </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Call To Action</h2><p style="text-align: left;">I know - I'm a tiny insignificant blogger writing on a tiny insignificant blog and yelling at the clouds. But even such a tiny voice can be magnified if it's taken up by many. And right now we need not only Senate enquiries and ACCC looking into the actions of supermarkets, we need <i style="font-weight: bold;">EVERYONE</i> to get activated, be informed, read about it so that they too can make their feelings known. Share this post (<a href="https://bit.ly/store-rage" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/store-rage</a>) so that many others will see it. Ask them in turn to share it too. Just please get the word out there - our supermarkets are just the tip of the iceberg, fuel companies, energy companies, real estate and landlords - they're all chowing down hard on the record profits they've been building up to, and consequently reducing our lives to just being cash machines for them. It's time at least one country stood up for older more human values again. Help the change along</p><p style="text-align: left;"><br /></p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="400px" id="shareButtonsIframe" scrolling="no" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" width="154px"></iframe><script>document.getElementById('shareButtonsIframe').src ='https://ohaicorona.com/ShareButtBanner01.html?parentUrl=' + encodeURIComponent(window.location.href);</script></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">As always, stay awesome and</p><p style="text-align: center;">KEEP THE BASTARDS HONEST!</p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Got a tip? Questons? Want me to email you? <a href="https://bit.ly/m/PTEC3D_Links" target="_blank">Go here for contact details.</a></span></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-78891427240023590842024-02-20T22:00:00.001+08:002024-02-20T22:00:00.284+08:00Enshittification 101: More F-lockin-tech<h4 style="text-align: left;">I've used the word "flockintech" a few times now, most of you will have gathered it's a portmanteau word for "F'ing Lock-in Technology," but how many people are aware of just how much flockintech we are actually stuck with already? And this also goes ,for our techie/geeky focus in my blogs, particularly for technology products and software.</h4><p>I've pointed out the matter of John Deere tractors (<i>and yes they are "technology" because technology is inextricably tied up with almost every machinery technology</i>) and a Polish railway that had to hack a piece of carriage-disabling malware that <i style="font-weight: bold;">the carriage manufacturer introduced into the carriages</i> to ensure they had to always be heavily used and regularly "serviced" by the manufacturer, which caused significant downtime for the railway and was eventually fixed by an anonymous hacker group removing the malware from the carriages. </p><p>There's a video platform where people have paid to save videos and as the company founders, are unable to keep the videos they've saved on the platform. There have been several other online properties that sold a permanent product to their customers and then said products became unusable when the company went tits-up and the servers were switched off. </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Got A Fitbit? </h2><p>I'll start off, for now, among the first items on this week's "<a href="https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/downloadthisshow/why-were-meta-and-tiktok-grilled-by-the-us-senate-/103371184" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download This Show</a>" podcast is the Fitbit Update Bricking And upRoar incident I'm choosing to call FUBAR. (<i>Yep. Look FUBAR up if you don't already know what it means and where it came from...</i>) Marc mentions in the podcast that Google are being a bit coy about the update <i>possibly/possibly not</i> causing the fitbits to go from a battery life measurable in days, to a battery life measurable in around 60 minutes. </p><p>I can tell you what I think. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Enshittification</a>. That's how you add or subtract features to an existing successful product, and (<i>as the name suggests</i>) turning said product into ka-ka. My newsletter software is a case in point, offered a free-forever low volume product,realised that meant a lot of small bloggers like myself, and at first began adding bloat features I'll never use, and finally, when they realised after a year that we who can't afford it, simply can't afford to go to the Pro version, so they've introduced a "<i>we're turning this server to a Pro server and you'll have to follow this five thousand word guide to move your existing newsletter to another server just for Free tier users.</i>" </p><p>I voted with my feet, I have few newsletter users, very little free time to be moving them to another platform or whatever, the newsletter will have to wait. If I had a few donations I could just Pro-ify the existing account again but as I have neither I'll get to it when convenient. </p><p>Back to the Fitbit:- Google bought the company and began integrating it with their own ecosystem, which was fantastic for the fairly basic thing the Fitbit was in its infancy. (<i>They mention this in the podcast.</i>)</p><p>They also mention that Google now has a smart watch product of their own that does what the Fitbit does among a host of other features. I'd be enshittifying the hell out of the Fitbit if I was the person marketing the Google Watch which is purpose-designed to work in their ecosystem, and mayber that's what's just happened. Stay tuned to this - will a new update be able to reverse and fix the last update, or will it turn out that the software update overdrove some components that then shorted out and will now the affected Fitbits now be rendered unusable?</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Got Windows? </h3><p>This has to be my favourite example of enshittification and flockintech ever. Windows 2 - almost no-one knew about. Windows 3 - much the same. But there wasn't an upgrade path. You bought each version. Windows 3.11 (<i>the first one with networking and thus the first natively Internet-capable Windows operating system</i>) I think was the same. </p><p>And it's not like you could afford to keep using W3.11 to this very day. For a start, it's well-known and has well-known exploits. Microsoft started offering some security updates but of course support stopped because they wanted us to buy the next great OS from them. For a another, the hardware it ran on is hard to get. (<i>Although I have to note that just recently, a job opening for a Windows 3.11 Administrator has become one of the most rarified jobs in IT, and probably the last workplace to use this version of Windows which would by now be over twenty years old, and replaced by Windows 95 in 1995.</i>)</p><p>There have been 27 versions of Windows since W95, some upgrades, some for different tasks (<i>server vs workstation etc</i>) with 14 just being upgrades of W10. Until W10, you bought each new version of Windows as it cam out. W10 offered free installation to owners of approved older operating systems, so not quite as much money was made on W10, and some enshittification resulted, where things were added to W10 to allow exfiltration of the "owner's" usage data, and a whole lot more details. </p><p>W11 has been described as a "Spy in a trenchcoat" it exfiltrates so much user data. Losing so much of my personal information constitutes enshittification to me. </p><p>Also, even if you own one of the earlier Windows versions and are still happy with it, Microsoft tries to lock you into their upgrade cycle by ending update support for the old version. You may say "Big ****ing deal" to that but Internet security is one of the things that you'll no longer get updates for. And the older an operating system, the more vulnerabilities are found, even after Microsoft stops patching. Due to the fact that while you notionally "own" that version of Windows, you have no access to the code, so you can't fix new vulnerabilities yourself. So in that sense you're either locked-in to their versions cycle, or locked-in to being hacked within five minutes of putting your new re-installation of your OS online. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">EverNote</h3><p>I've had an account on Evernote since before forever or even further back. The free account was fine for me, I didn't turn that much traffic or quantity on the servers, I used it well within the usage limits for a free account. I only used it to keep blogging notes current between my laptop, my PC, and my phone. Not long after I got it working for me the way I needed, They reduced the number of devices I could use it on. No longer useful. And the other day I wanted to download my notes for historic reasons, and I have to install the PC app just to make an archive. I will. But then Evernote will see one less user for their enshittification, lock-in, and general bait-and-switch tactics.</p><p>I'm just listening to another enshittified product:</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">TED Talks Daily</h3><p>This one isn't flockintech but definitely enshittified. I've been listening to the 'cast for ages, and ads. And I cast them to the TV when in the lounge because it feels more natural to me to listen to stuff on speakers while working. (<i>As I'm doing right now, listening to a TED Talk on climate technologiews that are worth supporting.</i>)</p><p></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;">Ads. TV and radio have long been legislated into keeping the audio and colour saturation levels down to normal levels. The audio level of a commercial must be the same as the program material, preventing those <b><span style="font-size: large;">SHOUTY!!!</span></b> ads on TV that used to shake the house in an effort to get your attention. </span></blockquote><p></p><p>Apparently, there's no such restraint placed on TED Talks Daily. While my wife's unwell, she needs bed rest. It's all the way at the other end of the house from the loungeroom, but in order to hear the program 3-4metres away from the screen, I need a certain volume level. </p><p>That level is inaudible in the bedroom, but the ads on the podcast are loud enough to wake a person in the bedroom. So in a way TTD has locked me into earhpones or earbuds. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Others?</h3><p>I said earlier that I'll go back and find a few more of the thousands of great technologies that gradually enshittified and locked-in their users bit by bit to the point of killing their business, and I will. I suggest you bookmark this page and come back to it in a few weeks. Also maybe share it, and maybe make a small donation to help me keep things online, maybe afford a better newsletter provider, and pay for the subscriptions I keep so I can keep up with the news I post here. </p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="400px" id="shareButtonsIframe" scrolling="no" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" width="154px"></iframe><script>document.getElementById('shareButtonsIframe').src ='https://ohaicorona.com/ShareButtBanner01.html?parentUrl=' + encodeURIComponent(window.location.href);</script></div>
<p><br /></p><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-15154960162643421382024-02-05T22:00:00.027+08:002024-03-14T08:03:32.070+08:00Supermarkets Are Overflowing - multiple updates!<p>Please scroll down for an announcement, take action, and scroll back here. Cheers!</p><h4 style="text-align: left;">- with profits! Profits! Glorious profits! Money! YOUR money! The only difference between supermarkets and Uncle Scrooge McDuck is that Scrooge has a pang of conscience at the end of each episode and stops some of his exploitative behaviours.</h4><p>EVEN MORE UPDATE: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoo6XVxpiU8" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Four Corners</a> these supermarkets are the gift that keeps on giving - if you wanted material to string them up by the privates, at any rate. The CEO of Wo - that one supermarket - walks out of his Four Corners interview because he heaped shit on a professional in the industry, and wasn't allowed to ask to have that bit edited out. Oh and then a few days later he conveniently resigns. </p><p>(<i>Probably to get his golden handshake before he was pushed, but. And even though he claims it was planned all along, Wo - that place - obviously were NOT expecting him to resign because they're now scrambling because they had no succession plan. Sucks to be an incompetent money-pilfering slug...</i>)</p><p>And the CEO of Co - the other place - adjusts their lipstick to "incandescent" setting, and bald-faced declares that they're not actually on a rocket ride of profits. How can you tell a ColeWorths CEO is lying? They just are. Always. </p><p>UPDATE 14/Mar/2024: <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/03/13/supermarket-woolworths-coles-theft">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/03/13/supermarket-woolworths-coles-theft</a> how the supermarkets are reacting to desperate people who resort to shoplifting to pay for supermakets' price gouging. I wonder how long this will last? </p><p>AND ANOTHER UPDATE!: <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/02/11/coles-woolworths-senate-inquiry" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/02/11/coles-woolworths-senate-inquiry</a></p><p>UPDATED AGAIN AGAIN: <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/30/supermarkets-government-profits" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/30/supermarkets-government-profits</a> This is becoming the spectacle of the decade!</p><p>UPDATED AGAIN: <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/02/06/price-gouging-report" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2024/02/06/price-gouging-report</a> </p><p>UPDATED: There may be some activity afoot. (<a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/16/grocery-prices-inquiry" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/16/grocery-prices-inquiry</a>) I asked in <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2024/01/supermarkets-and-nuclear-option.html" target="_blank">this older article</a> whether the probe will have teeth, i.e. will it be able to actually compel the corporations that own the thieving supermarkets to act with humanity, and this update seems to suggest that the probe will get teeth. Unfortunately, legal action in a year is still a little bit too late for people already doing it hard...</p><p>You may know <a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/11/inflation-supermarkets-2024" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the back-story to this</a> - over a year ago, meat producers (<i>farmers, basically</i>) got bent over and shafted, as the prices of meat were wound back by large amounts. I imagine this reduced their ability to purchase things, and because some fairly large communities' fortunes rise and fall in time with the primary producers, that starts to be a bit of a large number of people who suddenly have fewer dollars, while simultaneously their costs went up as supermarkets raised prices. </p><p>It's all very well to say "but they live in a farming district, they can get their meat / vegetables locally at farm prices" but you lose sight of a few factors there.</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>The farmers will need to make a profit on their unsold meat animals. </li><li>Most people in farming communities lack the skills to butcher and dress meat</li><li>The butchers in those communities need to make money too.</li><li>If the community is centered on meat, then vegetables and cereal products are still at the mercy of the supermarkets.</li><li>Vice-a-versa in the case of growing districts. In their case, they need someone to process the grain and produce goods from it. The supermarkets again.And they're at the mercy for anything related to meat.</li><li>Vegetable (<i>market garden</i>) regions are probably best off in one sense, but also their market gardeners need to make money so prices will go up when the prices they get from supermarket buyers goes down.</li><li>On top of that many farmers/growers have draconian contracts with the supermarkets that prohibit them from sell surplus to third parties, many many many penalty clauses, and so there are a lot of things they can't do even if they wanted to... It sucks.</li></ul><p></p><p>There's unfortunately not much that many people can do about that - "food deserts" are engineered into local planning by design, making it hard to get anything but fast food or some supermarket foods. It means the fast food places and the supermarkets have a huge customer base that doesn't have any alternatives.</p><p>It's also down to some selectivity by sellers, of course. You'll find upmarket grocers and butchers and bakeries in upmarket suburbs, because there, they will get the prices they need in order to stay profitable. Same with farmer's markets etc - if they're set up in a suburb that has two McDonalds, two KFCs, a Hungry Jacks, and four chicken fast food places, they don't do well.</p><p>Jaks Sisko in Star Trek focuses this problem perfectly - he cooks his own meals because he considers them superior to the replicator-generated meals - but where does he get his ingredients? Wouldn't that also be from the replicator? </p><p>So people shop at supermarkets where the growers and suppliers have been stretched to the limit to supply nutritious food but - under that kind of financial stress, they can't afford to do all the things that would be needed to make the food truly nutritious. That kind of farming requires far more land, land that can be regeneratively and ecologically soundly managed, and even then the soil will lack some of the nutritional components needed to make the produce truly nutrition-packed.</p><p>Even if you go to farm gate stores, they're still in the same situation, so whether they sell it to the supermarkets or to you direct, it's still no longer what it was. The world population is showing the effects of slow nutrition deprivement. </p><p>But the story I'm showing revolves more about the sheer extortion supermarkets are engaging in at the moment. They've always found ways to extract more dollars from a given kilo of produce, but now they're just going "fuck it," and charging extortionate prices. </p><p>I can think of <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2024/01/supermarkets-and-nuclear-option.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">one way</a> to end that, but it's not pretty. We could also end it by boycotting those supermarkets for a month or two, but as mentioned, that isn't an option for anyone wanting to feed a family unless they have their own homestead or farm, or access to farmer's markets and farm gate stores. </p><p>The other way is for farmers to void their contracts with the supermarkets and only sell direct to the public or to independent grocers and stores. And they can't afford to do that because of the logistics involved. </p><p>Also, automated local vertical farms can produce many of the vegetables and fruits within their local suburbs, but this is a) unlikely to be profitable for the first five years or so until it starts hurting the big supermarkets and people get used to them and b) - come on! This would be like living in a colony ship or a colony on another planet with carefully-maintained agriculture and a limited range of produce, and this is supposed to be our home. </p><p>But there's also the other way - write to your local Members, to the ministers responsible for finance and food security and anti-competitive practices by corporations and let them all know that you'd like them to use their powers to fix this piracy. Start petitions or sign them, have meetings with others in your suburb, decide on some action before food becomes unaffordable to you, too. And trust me, it can easily happen. </p><hr /><p>Okay, we're "down here." What's going on? My wife is facing a life/death medical issue and I'm spending as much time as possible with her, caring, being there. </p><p>That does mean that I'm not doing as much writing, which means fewer posts, fewer announcements on social media, fewer people's eyes being directed to the blog suite. You can help me out though - share this article, follow the (<i>newspaper icon</i>) link to the News Stand and share that on your social media too. This should bring a few more readers, and with luck, a snowballing effect.</p><div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div><p>You can also help immensely by making a donation, either one-off or periodically, as that will allow me to pay online / running costs rather than taking away what little income we have.</p><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-16841382395729800822024-01-23T22:00:00.001+08:002024-01-23T22:00:00.140+08:00Flockintech<p>First I have a favour to ask you. I probably won't have time to post as regularly as I have been. Family / health problem, yes serious. But it means I'll need your help - please share this post, share the News Stand link, and help others to find my articles.</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">What kind of tech is "flockintech?" Stick around. What do Polish trains, premium EVs, and farm tractors have in common? Stick around. What does flockintech have in common with - no, hang on. Just stick around...</h4><h3 style="text-align: left;">John Deere</h3><p>So you probably know about the <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64206913" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">John Deere vs farmers</a> saga. If you bought a John Deere tractor and got your local mechanic to change a filter, the tractor would probably shut down. John Deere designed this and other gotchas into the machines. The idea was that a JD technician would come to the farm, change that filter with an identical filter that your local mechanic would have put in, <i style="font-weight: bold;">typed in a secret JD authentication code</i>, and the tractor would work. </p><p>The JD technician would cost the farmer thousands of dollars, the mechanic probably only a few hundred. Can you say residual income rip-off? </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Premium Vehicles</h3><p>Many premium cars and especially EVs, come with dozens of features included in the construction by default, but you can't have them unless you pay extra fees for them. This is a particularly vexing ... umm, let's call it what it is, a total fraud - because you bought the car with all those features in it but the manufacturer is holding you to ransom if you want them enabled. Worse still, some of those features are only available <i style="font-weight: bold;">by subscription</i>, meaning they can deny you them if you don't provide them with that residual income rip-off. </p><p>There aren't all that many ways around this issue unless you're extremely good at writing a whole new management program for the vehicle, and of course if you muck it up you void any warranty...</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Polish Trains</h3><blockquote><p>"Newag, the company that manufactured the trains, had software in place that put locks on the carriages if they were serviced by third party mechanics or if the cars remained stationary for too long."</p></blockquote><p>Seeing a familiar theme develop here? Gouging goes deep, and there needs to be some kind of solution. </p><p>Worldwide, "Right To Repair" laws are being drafted and enacted, that will force manufacturers to allow a person who buys a product, to perform maintenance and repairs on that product. Many manufacturers are pooling their resources to fight these laws being introduced, but as you read, John Deere have been wrestled to the ground on this, and once more RtR laws are enacted, so will most of these other thieving bastards.</p><p>RtR laws will also require that devices are not "permitted" to be repaired but then physically obstructed, that is, no "proprietary" fasteners to prevent access, no filling the electronics with potting resin except where a product's Ingress and Explosion ratings require it. </p><p>And as for the Polish railway line, their fightback has involved a rather strange ally. <a href="https://boingboing.net/2023/12/28/polish-hackers-successfully-bypass-manufacturers-bricking-of-trains.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read it here</a>.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Anonymous Assistance</h3><p>The precedents have been set, before JD were forced to relinquish their ransom booty, a few farmers hacked their own tractors and faced legal action from JD, and in fact was one of the factors that shaped the JD-farmers outcome. </p><p>It would now appear that the few hacks I've found online for unlocking the premium features of your car, may soon be legal, and there's not a thing BMW will be able to do about people unlocking the massage feature and heated seat options of their cars, because the car was sold with those things already built in, and you can argue that the manufacturer locking them down amounts to sabotaging the vehicle and introducing faults that it's your right to repair.</p><p>There's another name that sprang to mind when I read those articles, and it's "Lock-In Tech." They lock you into a system and then charge you a premium price or subscription to unlock the features. In the case of JD, there may be a case for charging them with sabotaging a farmer's livelihood, I'm not sure on that point. </p><p>But now when you read me writing <b>F Lock In Tech</b> you'll know exactly what the title means...</p><p>Come on - share the link to this article, share the link to the News Stand where people can see my latest twenty or so posts, and maybe make a donation to help me pay my server and sundry online fees.</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-10214405205672407992024-01-10T22:00:00.004+08:002024-01-17T04:57:04.971+08:00Supermarkets And The Nuclear Option<p><span style="font-family: times;">First - please scroll to the bottom to see what's happening in my life, and take action. Then come back up here. Thank you.</span></p><h4 style="text-align: left;">Okay, what? Nuclear? What are the supermarkets up to now? If that was your first thought, then congratulations, you've proved one of my points. We wouldn't put <i style="font-weight: bold;">anything</i> past supermarkets, including - stuff to do with whatever nuclear whatsname I'm referring to.</h4><p>If you thought maybe there might be more to this than just one of the supermarkets serving berries with a side of Cherenkov radiation, then I'm betting you know more about <i style="font-weight: bold;">me</i> and my radical recommendations... 😸</p><p>UPDATED: There may be some activity afoot. (<a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/16/grocery-prices-inquiry" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2024/01/16/grocery-prices-inquiry</a>) I ask in this article whether the probe will have teeth, i.e. will it be able to actually compel the corporations that own the thieving supermarkets to act with humanity, and this update seems to suggest that the probe will get teeth. Unfortunately, legal action in a year is still a little bit too late for people already doing it hard...</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">What's The Story?</h2><p><a href="https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/2024/01/10/supermarket-probe-craig-emerson" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">This is.</a> The Reserve Bank keeps raising interest rates because inflation isn't going down, and the supermarkets - by some strange coincidence - are making billions of dollar more per quarter which could possibly raise inflation...</p><p>Supermarkets are making record ten to twenty billion-dollar quarterly profits and the Australian government has "had enough of it" and is appointing Craig Emerson to head a "probe," a "Code of Conduct review." I don't think this goes anywhere near far enough. </p><p>This "probe," this "review." Does it have teeth? And by that I mean, does it have any power to not merely "make recommendations" but to compel? Somehow, I doubt it'll have those teeth. And yet it should - WAY more teeth. If you know me, you know...</p><p>Note how they only release QUARTERLY figures because if we actually saw the annual figures we'd be torching their fucking stores and lynching anyone above the level of floor manager. Here - I'll do it for you:</p><blockquote><p>"Coles posted $10.25 billion in first-quarter sales in 2023, a 3.6 per cent rise compared to the first quarter of the 2022 financial year, while Woolworths’ revenue grew by 5.3 per cent for a total of $17.2 billion."</p></blockquote><p>That was 2023. Their costs have gone down even further since then, and - as we're all to painfully aware - their prices have gone up inexorably. But just extrapolating those figures for the last year:</p><p>Coles would have made between $41bn and $45bn depending on how many more opportunities they took to screw their producers and consumers. </p><p>Woolworths would have made <b>$69bn - $72bn</b>. In a year. </p><p>If I projected a steady 3.6 to 5.3 percent per annum growth they'll make between $43bn to $49bn and $73bn and $79bn, roughly, this year. </p><p>That's not only not right, I think that's criminal level fraud and pricing scams. There ought to be jail terms attached to this investigation, AFP-level search and seizure of paperwork and documentation. </p><p>Possibly, if some amounts of deliberate malfeasance is established, the installation of government officials as the final arbiters of policy in the corporate offices of those supermarkets.</p><p>THAT is my nuclear option. Whattya reckon? (<i>Note the UPDATE at the head of this article - it seems I wasn't the only one thinking the time for the carrot was over...</i>)</p><p><br /></p><hr /><p><span style="font-family: times;">Family facing health crisis. I may not be able to post as often, meaning fewer announcements, meaning fewer visitors. I'm asking you to help out. Share this post to all your social media, share it by email. Go to the image just below here, find the rolled-up newspaper icon, and share that URL too, so that more people get to see my latest 20 posts. Maybe even donate to help out with server and domain fees. </span></p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p>As always - please share this article and others like it, share the URL of the News Stand, help my posts be seen by a wider audience.</p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-27467253771482120682023-11-09T22:00:00.040+08:002023-11-09T22:00:00.147+08:00Netflix And No. <h4 style="text-align: left;">I recall reading recently - no, watching a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXZzyKTsBMw" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">longish video</a> - about Netflix's slow crumbling. But they now reckon they have the problem in hand. So anyway here's that video. It's a year old so form whatever opinion it brings you.</h4><p>But Imma have my doubts about this though - in <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/oct/18/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown-subscribers" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">this recent article</a> they say "added 8.8m subscribers" but how many are just waiting out their current subscription and then hauling ass? I know I would be. If I were a Netflix customer, at any rate. </p><p>I've enjoyed my entertainment as much as the next person when I was somewhat younger, but started my teen years looking for the few techie shows like The New Inventors and Julius Somner-Miller. What I'm saying is that I never really considered Netflix a service I'd pay for, and going to the movies once every few months was enough for me to satisfy my need for blockbusters and amusement. We now have some streaming and watch a few entertainment shows but our day includes a lot of background of news and podcasts and techie articles and politics and ... </p><p>What I'm saying is that to us, Netflix has always been a bit of a waste of bandwidth and money, so we've found ourselves with a better-value subscription that has a good selection of entertainment and documentary and informative content, Nebula, Youtube, and whatever other indie sites there are out there.</p><p>But now they've gone and <a href="https://thenewdaily.com.au/entertainment/2023/10/19/netflix-plan-price-hike" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">done this</a> bait-and-switch, removed a subscription level that people obviously liked, and are faffing around as though they're going great guns when as far as I can see their existing subscribers will be looking for a platform that's more honest and stable. I would.</p><p>I just finished an <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2023/11/why-i-dont-have-patreon.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">article about Patreon</a> doing much the same things, adding things people don't want, trying to wrangle more money out of their creators. And how many of them are as a result disillusioned and thinking about Ko-Fi and other alternatives. That instability and level of BS is what kept me from having much to do with Patreon at all.</p><p>What about you? Netflix freak or Netflix-freaked?</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-79115690565629819522023-11-08T07:19:00.001+08:002023-11-08T07:19:00.149+08:00The Fat Bears Story<h4 style="text-align: left;">The Katmai National Park and Preserve’s Fat Bears Story.</h4><p><span style="color: #2b00fe; font-family: times;"></span></p><blockquote><span style="color: #2b00fe; font-family: times;">I'll report it like a mainstream media article first:</span></blockquote><p></p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Sisters Breaking Traditional Molds On The Road To Reproductive Success</h2><p style="text-align: left;">Two Alaskan Brown Bears are going where no others of their kind have gone before. And it's proved successful for them.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Factoids You Need, To Appreciate The Story</h3><p>Unprecedented <a href="https://mashable.com/article/fat-bear-week-katmai-bears" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fat Bear extended family</a> first spotted in 2022. </p><p>909's cub <a href="https://mashable.com/article/fat-bear-week-katmai-bear-story" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">goes to live with auntie</a> 910</p><p>909jr is into its 3rd year of life, 910jr now in its 2nd year.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">So The Story So Far</h3><p>909, at a year older than her sister 910, has her first cub, 909jr. The year started ordinarily enough, but when the following year proved to be a rich and successful year for Fat Bear contestants, and when her sister 910 also had a cub, 909 and 910 did something that other Brown Bears never did - they moved around together, foraged and fished together, and their cubs played together through the entire season.</p><p>It's unknown if the group hibernated together but there may be a non-zero chance that they did. (<i>Ed: this is supposition on the part of the reporter and was not a confirmed scientific opinion.</i>) The following Spring, the amazing thing that happened was heartwarming: 909jr stayed with auntie 910, freeing 909 to go off and (<i>presumably</i>) mate again. </p><p>If true, and if 909jr and 910jr learn a newfound sense of society, then the reproductive advantages of such a strategy may prove a turning point for the 909/910 group and perhaps one day for all brown bears.</p><p><span style="font-family: times;"></span></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;">Now I'll go back to my own style.</span></blockquote><p></p><p>I'm going to be looking for one particular Fat Bear Tale in 2024, the one about 909 coming back with another cub and probably that cub also leaving her in 2025 to go live with auntie 910 while (<i>presumably</i>) 909jr goes out on its own. And then returns to a social group it remembers fondly. </p><p>Just imagine - by being free from her cub, 909 is able to have another cub sooner than she would normally have been able to. By forming a family unit, these two ladies have created a way to fit more cubs into a given period of time. By being together for various generations, the cubs will begin to form habits conducive to more social behaviour, and if they stick it out for a few more years, their group will begin to grow, with "nursery aunties" and "mother aunties" making a noticable bump in fecundity. </p><p>This shows several things:</p><p>1. It's generally the females of solitary species that form socially cohesive groups because they're bound to raising infants, and many paws make light work.</p><p>2. It only takes a "right" combination of genes to create a greater likelihood of social cohesion emerging.</p><p>3. Since such social groups are more likely to be closer genetically, the trait concentrates in the group.</p><p>4. Also, since the cubs have been reared and raised in atypically larger groups, they'll themselves begin to form social groups like this more readily.</p><p>And I think that perhaps it's also a good overall simile for how ANY organism becomes more successful through being more social. Why isn't it seemingly working for us any more?</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<div><br /></div>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-59560110377769774992023-10-16T15:40:00.008+08:002023-10-16T15:42:55.255+08:00How Many Will Have To Die?<h4 style="text-align: left;">This. WTAF?</h4><p>Combine <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/oct/16/covid-deaths-rise-scrap-mask-wearing-hospitals" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">this</a> with the claim of a correspondent that most medical staff become too unwell / discouraged / anxious to keep working after their 4th or 5th infection, the medical system's pretty much going to founder and sink...</p><p>Considering how many people I see going to the medical centre and chemist (thus proving that they apparently do believe in science) not wearing masks (thus proving that they obviously don't believe in science) I guess I'm not really surprised. But I wish there was another planet to escape to where people aren't suicidally stupid.</p><p style="text-align: left;">Sorry I have to post this here rather than directly but BSky is still woefully inadequate for linked posts.</p><div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p>While you're here from BlueSky - please consider clicking the newspaper above and taking a look at my most recent posts, share the link to this one, and perhaps even spare a few shekels for an ex-leper? </p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-33258643472075524852023-10-12T22:00:00.001+08:002023-10-12T22:00:00.184+08:00They had ONE HEADLINE to feature...<h4 style="text-align: left;">This was their headline - this:</h4><p style="text-align: center;">"<a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-01/scientists-capture-first-images-of-white-faced-storm-petrel/102903390" rel="nofollow" style="font-family: abcsans, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 2rem; font-weight: var(--typography-font-weight,800);" target="_blank">Seabird population in decline</a>"</p><p>They should have led with that. They have one job. Give us the <i style="font-weight: bold;">important</i> news first. </p><p>So why they made this a feelgood story about a storm petrel is a mystery. "<i>Oh - we need to make all our stories good happy fluffy-bunny ones!</i>"</p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">"But hey - seabird populations are crashing."</span></p><p>Just saying - when a newspaper leads off with the gung-ho good news instead of the bit we should be focusing on, that we NEED to be told about if we want the world to pull out of this nosedive, then there's something wrong with mainstream media.</p><p>And it explains why the world's up that famous Creek without a paddle and with nothing but a barbedwire canoe under its backside.</p><hr />
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-40406799204123383842023-09-30T23:00:00.038+08:002023-09-30T23:00:00.177+08:00Our Future.<h4 style="text-align: left;">The Zorganite Encumber wishes to apologise to the unfortunate zorganism's clan/clade/family for the unfortunate events of 27 Sept 2023, and to announce that in future, our communications will take place on <a href="https://zorganiteencumber.blogspot.com/" target="">The Zorganite Encumber News Zorgan</a>. Again - we are terribly sorry that the Zorgan blogger was - not strong... </h4><p style="text-align: left;">In other news, this means that by going to the above link, you'll find another article, and a new article for today, meaning that you will have been graced with two for one. You lucky Zorganisms you!</p><p style="text-align: center;"><i>The Sandal! Not the Encumber Cucumber!</i></p><p style="text-align: left;"><i><br /></i></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-89051257050890440482023-09-24T09:03:00.002+08:002023-09-25T08:11:40.907+08:00Welcome to the Zorganite Encumber!<h4 style="text-align: left;">The Zorganite Encumber is an organization that existed only offline, in paper form. Then the advert that we'd originally submitted in letter form to a small local newspaper and paid for in perpetuity was finally ported to a classifieds database and finally became data. It was only a matter of time before this person who runs this blog decided to put the first reference to the Encumber online, unaware that the mind worm was what was really doing the typing. </h4><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8ycQZ6FBRg76y7oNjBSLwJa17Jffl8lAyJUIoPJSuGi6okL7YT-GHzQjzYaX0BLfjLqYG6ctXwL8HSgdj-wPlndlqfXwK2Bpflvz-DC-JExXkgc0h04kaKNQXBViykFqBKmDBdyJ0QoOokHGyjVgDZNY5kOFUIbFk-Phw_WvuQmWI8qKOHLRtXA/s430/ZorgEncu_Banner.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="94" data-original-width="430" height="70" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8ycQZ6FBRg76y7oNjBSLwJa17Jffl8lAyJUIoPJSuGi6okL7YT-GHzQjzYaX0BLfjLqYG6ctXwL8HSgdj-wPlndlqfXwK2Bpflvz-DC-JExXkgc0h04kaKNQXBViykFqBKmDBdyJ0QoOokHGyjVgDZNY5kOFUIbFk-Phw_WvuQmWI8qKOHLRtXA/s320/ZorgEncu_Banner.png" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>It was all so simple in the days of printed newspapers...</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="text-align: left;">You are now encouraged to cause to have printed a suite of these "tee shirts" with the message </p><div style="text-align: left;"><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><b>"Join the Zorganite Encumber. By reading this, you already have."</b></span></div>and taking advantage of the "viral effect" to recruit newly-Encumbereds.We feel that the time has come.</div><p>Please price these "tee shirts" so that they reach widespread adoption and recruit members for us on a geometrically increasing basis. Please do not post images on these "tee shirts" of anything else, especially Zorgan's Sandal. We feel that the recruiting message has stood us in good stead for nearly a century now and still commands as much power as we require of it and should stand alone. And not in Comic Sans please.</p><p>Please also support this newly-Encumbered writer of this "blog" by joining their newsletter so that we may once again speak to all Zorganites when the time comes. Please also support this Encumbered faithful by donating using the links. We will communicate using this new data medium, stay tuned!</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="100px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p>There will soon be many other imitators, but please remember that only this blog has Zorgan's Sandal! (<i>This is not to be confused with Zorgan's Cucumber, which is something we shall never speak of again.</i>) </p><p style="text-align: center;">By reading this, you already have.</p><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-32015678858756083542023-09-01T11:11:00.000+08:002023-09-01T11:11:03.643+08:00Just NewsCast Thoughts. #1<h4 style="text-align: left;">These are just random thoughts I have as I'm listening to the day's news podcasts. </h4><p></p><div style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="font-size: medium;">NSFW!</span></b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><i>I have a gutter brain.</i></div><p></p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Note:</h2><p>I provide this just as a series of brainfart notes taken as I listen to the news and switch between these and my other pursuits. The date will generally give a rough idea of what the News Of The Day was but there are generally no links to stuff. Old Skool online searching all the way folks!</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div><div align="center"><span style="font-family: times; font-size: x-small;">These articles won't get announced because they happen as they happen and I don't want to clutter up my newsfeed with them. Also, they may get updated as I hear more news, they aren't a daily feature but more happen as I find time and commentworthy stuff in the news, but you will see them if you click the newspaper icon in the middle of the graphic above. From there you can subscribe to my once-a-week newsletter, or even *gasp* make a donation every now and then, or make a small monthly stipend to my work. It's always appreciated and goes towards keeping me writing and creating and Making and Sharing. Please do consider helping me with this.</span></div>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">And here are the news</h2><div>Autonomous vehicle - whether you're in a bus or an airplane or a car driven by your friend/family, there are already a whole range of things we wouldn't do it a vehicle. Take your pick. </div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p><p>DVD if streaming services like Netflix drop DVDs then pirate P2P will become the mainstream way to review old series and shows, as they're the archivists and curators of such shows now. I predict a federated p2p series that will very quickly be deployed once it's shown </p><p>They're making entertainment ephemeral. That in turn makes us more likely to accept the gaslighting in the news that is mainstream media retconning. </p><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p><p>Experts blaming delay in delivering renewables - it was the energy companies ditching expensive-to-maintain fossil fuel plant and NOT installing renewables because it would dent their fabulous record profits. Bastards. Greedy bastardss. That is all. Fuck retconning the last few years. </p><p>And that failure started with the LNP not the Albanese govt. We'll be feeling the damage wrought by the LNP for deceades to come. They never thought further than their pockets and their pocket-adjacent dicks, so renewables were quietly hamstrung and delayed and canned, while fossil fuel projects were lauded and boosted and ensconced for years to come. All because Scott Morrison liked having his pocket-adjacents fondled by people with real power. </p><p>(Yes, ALL his pocket-adjacent parts, that he took upon himself in a criminal action to try and stay in office so his pocket genitalia would get a good hard long makeover. Luckily for Australia, it didn't work and he's still a limp-dick loser. Unluckily for Australia, he's still clinging stubbornly to the hope that he can retcon (== gaslight) his way back into the Fondling Chair he once held.)</p><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p><p>In fact, the whole damn world has discovered retconning. COVID is rampaging five to ten times as much and causing a hundredfold increase in COVID-related illnesses and diseases as the intitial lockdown pandemic stages but now not waering masks (and voluntary slow suicide by disease) are condoned on the basis that we're not easily able to access statistics so everything's better. Right? </p>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div><p style="text-align: center;">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p></div>
<div><p> </p></div>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div><div align="center"><span style="font-family: times; font-size: x-small;">These articles won't get announced because they happen as they happen and I don't want to clutter up my newsfeed with them. Also, they may get updated as I hear more news, they aren't a daily feature but more happen as I find time and commentworthy stuff in the news, but you will see them if you click the newspaper icon in the middle of the graphic above. From there you can subscribe to my once-a-week newsletter, or even *gasp* make a donation every now and then, or make a small monthly stipend to my work. It's always appreciated and goes towards keeping me writing and creating and Making and Sharing. Please do consider helping me with this.</span></div>
teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-56003962348538265292023-07-10T23:00:00.106+08:002023-07-10T23:00:00.153+08:00Newspeak, Newfood, Newproblems<h4 style="text-align: left;">We live in a time when "good" can mean "actually bad but we'll pretend" and "safe" can mean "actually toxic but safer than alternatives" and "aid" that's actually a burden and "positive action" that has negative consequences, you'd be excused for thinking we're in the plot of 1984 or some Kafka-esque plot... </h4><p>This is going to be a bit longer an article than I usually write. But this is a HUGE topic and really nees me to try and and condense 20-30 posts' worth of concepts and ideas into just one.</p><p>Was just listening to a <a href="https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWJjLm5ldC5hdS9yYWRpb25hdGlvbmFsL2ZlZWQvMjg4MzA5OC9wb2RjYXN0LnhtbA/episode/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWJjLm5ldC5hdS9yYWRpb25hdGlvbmFsL3Byb2dyYW1zL2JpZ2lkZWFzL2dlb3JnZS1tb25iaW90LWZvb2QtZmFybWluZy1iYWN0ZXJpYS1yZWdlbmVzaXMvMTAyMzIxODg0?ep=14" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">podcast</a> about agriculture and the use of factory manufactured meat products among other things. It struck me just how very little we actually know about the biology of eating and absorption yet, how we're pinning hopes on this new hope on the horizon.</p><p>And amid a push to make "unimal" meat (<i>like what I did there? From "animal" to "unimal?" I have reasons...</i>) are a few of us saying "Hold up. WHAT exactly is that that you're making? Is it REALLY safe? Are you sure it's just like real animal protein?" and watching the space carefully. </p><p>Take chicken. We don't even know all the enzymes, endocrines, trace elements etc in a piece of chicken protein. Chicken meat comes from a whole chicken not just off a thigh or breast. There are other organs that pump nutrients into the bits we eat. So just cloning the cellular structure won't magically fill that protein with all those micronutrients. And unless you basically (<i>and very macabrely!</i>) grow and lay out all the other chicken organs as well and plumb them together with tubes you are NOT going to get a "real" piece of chicken.</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3DbSOKFB1aTNVk3glQB7En4xcPUa_jgoJER1h8H47wtOyJC6X4vnuW5USvXtkvk_u47zNsRQbowApfDXeOLp2fDlLX7HSiUZ1So99Vep-QMJXZo23PshKbrpS8CEDzzqiG_zLbeNUDhp8__ekMvjFarBcrT0yDehZBGfoio7wfuOS6KiXNgHbYA/s498/seemenoeggs.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="374" data-original-width="498" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3DbSOKFB1aTNVk3glQB7En4xcPUa_jgoJER1h8H47wtOyJC6X4vnuW5USvXtkvk_u47zNsRQbowApfDXeOLp2fDlLX7HSiUZ1So99Vep-QMJXZo23PshKbrpS8CEDzzqiG_zLbeNUDhp8__ekMvjFarBcrT0yDehZBGfoio7wfuOS6KiXNgHbYA/s320/seemenoeggs.png" width="320" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p>Also - is that grown protein going to grow as fast as it does in a (<i>factory</i>) chicken? Even with the best nutrient system in the business, those cells will only grow as fast as chicken muscle cells grow. And with the factory chickens, we're already so impatient and greedy that we pump them with growth hormones to make them grow faster. Is a potential manufacturer of artificial meat really going to ignore the benefits to their bottom line of GH? Of course not. Hidden in the list of nutrient ingredients, it'll be there. Anything to make it bigger faster more. More bottom line, less time. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Believe me - I <b><i>HATE</i></b> the killing of animals for the billions of us alive today. But I also hate the deaths of millions of us every year due to starvation, poor nutrition, malnutrition, and plain fraudulent food poisoning. </p><p style="text-align: left;">I think our species developed tolerances for certain foods - we switched from fruits and grasses to meats and vegetables and cereals over millennia - and then from raw food to cooked foods, which we're still in the process of adapting to. And we're changing the diet again, already. I keep mentioning how technology has seriously hit a vertical climb rate, and that's both a good thing and a bad thing. </p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">It's bad because we're changing our environment and diet and social structures all at the same time and are poorly equipped to adapt that quickly. But it's also good because the hope is that better knowledge will allow us to make changes that we'll be better adapted for, and fix some of the disasters we've created along the way.</p><p style="text-align: left;">I'll just mention some stuff off the "bad" end of the scale:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>We thought we'd made a good tranquiliser/anti-nausea drug. What we had was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">thalidomide</a>.</li><li>We thought we had a good cooking oil. We had <a href="https://neurosciencenews.com/web-stories/soybean-oil-autism-brain-170/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">soybean oil</a>. </li><li>We thought we should avoid natural animal fats and made our own. We made <a href="https://www.livestrong.com/article/272066-why-is-hydrogenated-oil-bad-for-you/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">hydrogenated trans fats</a>.</li><li>We thought fats were making us fat. <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">It was sugars</a>. </li><li>We decided sugar was too expensive so we found an alternative. We made <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">HFCS and metabolic syndrome</a>.</li><li>We thought we'd found a way to make cooking containers non-stick, carpets cleaner, and flame retardants more flame-retarding. Instead we have <a href="https://www.leafscore.com/eco-friendly-kitchen-products/pfas-pfoa-and-ptfe-everything-you-need-to-know/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">PFAS, PFOA, and PTFE</a>.</li><li>We wanted to use cars with higher-octane fuels so we developed <a href="https://phys.org/news/2021-09-petrol-pollution-linger.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">tetraethyl lead additive</a> for fuel.</li><li>Farmers wanted a broad spectrum herbicide, we made <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622992/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">glyphosate</a>.</li><li>Farmers also wanted their stock to be healthy and grow fast so the animals get dosed with <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6017557/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">antibiotics</a> and <a href="https://www.organic-center.org/research/environmental-and-health-impacts-growth-hormones-cattle-rearing" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">growth hormones</a>.</li><li>We wanted convenience and we made plastics. I don't think I need to put in any examples of how badly that's ending for us.</li></ul><p></p><p>Are you getting a picture here? We muck up so much of what we try to do with the natural world. We still don't have any clear idea of how nutrition works at the micro level but we're going to make unimal meat.</p><p>Despite <i style="font-weight: bold;">knowing</i> how little we really know, we're forging ahead with unmeats. I can see the concerns of <i>some</i> of the researchers, who plainly want to end the suffering of animal slaughter. But I can also see the greed on the people higher up in the chain of command who can only see dollar signs and not the suffering of the people who have become ill and died, and will become ill and die, of the unknown unintended consequences of basically experimenting on the customers.</p><p style="text-align: left;">There are quite a few items on the "good" list too - I probably don't need to itemise them because we're quite good at trumpeting those, whereas the bad examples above are still not really being talked about all that much. We tend to gloss such things over so as not to harsh the mellow too much. When things like the global warming happen, it's as if, by consensus, we avoid discussing it until we can't any avoid it any more. And that point seems to only just being reached... </p><p>The encouraging thing about that is that, once we get cracking, we usually manage to overcome whatever it is. The discouraging thing is that it's also been documented that people watched and discussed a tidal wave rolling in and stood their ground, only to have to run for their lives when it finally became obvious that the wall wasn't going to stop it. . . </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Food System Concerns:</h2><p>Going back to that podcast. George Monbiot has done the food research. He mentions the global standard farm and the global standard diet, and then says that food miles and being a locavore are less important than getting food. But he and his family own shares in a <b>local</b> orchard. He says that only the rich will eat if the food system collapses but that's not true. Only the rich and those that grow their own food and have a local network will eat. He's made sure he has a local network but to hell with anyone else. </p><p>He says the Michael Pollan truism about not eating anything your great-grand generation would recognise as food is bullshit and our diets have "changed enormously" in the last hundred years. And he's right. But he says it's also tastier and healthier than my great-grandmother's diet had been and in that he's wrong on both scores. </p><p>Agriculturally, our soils have become so impoverished by the standard farm and the standard diet that there's a very distinct and very measurable difference in the nutritional values of foods grown now compared to fifty years ago. And medically, our foods from that "standard food system" are more toxic than food grown fifty years ago, and far FAR more toxic and bereft of nutrition than foods grown 100-200 years ago.</p><p>Our soils on farms has changed beyond recognition.</p><p>Monbiot mentions the microcosm in the soil as a bit of a miracle beneath his feet and how that's the way agriculture works. But it doesn't. Standard farm farmers drench that microcosm with pesticides and fertilisers and contaminated animal manure and remove all the local flora and fauna that nourished that soil. And he then touts the regenerative farmers as the way forward but - it's a proven fact that we <i style="font-weight: bold;">can't</i> sustain the kind of volume that standard farms produce by regenerative growing - because the standard food needs standard farms and in fact if anything's going to cause the collapse of the food system it'll be insistence on doing this.</p><p>The changes to the soil biome are deep, radical, and detrimental. Once upon a time the small farms would be pretty much still integrated with the local ecosystem. There were literally thousand (<i>tens of thousands</i>) of species occupying that land, animals, bacteria, fungi, worms, other plants. And as George also points out, the soil was derived from the microcosms around the root systems of all those plants, the biomes around them. </p><p>But when you raze the ground and remove entire ecosystems, your soil become impoverished just by that one action. Then the microbiome around crop root systems is impoverished, and fertilisers is added. The natural predators of pest of the crop are not there, and the diseases and predation increase, and pesticides and herbicides have to be used. And now both the microbiomes around the roots of the crop - and by extension the microbiomes of our gut - are impoverished and out of balance and what we see in our digestive tracts today will be a pale shadow of what there was a scant few hundred years ago. </p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia1QK0BZT7XRgtNlIcUxgQrvu_fqz1YZZpVYRaOC7Je4M_8sGEayrLmbej2fzc0jMiTRoWofoTjfLiM7b0-CZUjEgkENis9B59rSCAjQ8sb75Q1rZnppgqur9ojfP2vrXUtX_gl24vi6z8DtLN3jqxE4tTu1-RlBw_GRcaukrdnNe-LDcmoNPphw/s1022/Monkey%20King%20Shit.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="837" data-original-width="1022" height="262" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia1QK0BZT7XRgtNlIcUxgQrvu_fqz1YZZpVYRaOC7Je4M_8sGEayrLmbej2fzc0jMiTRoWofoTjfLiM7b0-CZUjEgkENis9B59rSCAjQ8sb75Q1rZnppgqur9ojfP2vrXUtX_gl24vi6z8DtLN3jqxE4tTu1-RlBw_GRcaukrdnNe-LDcmoNPphw/s320/Monkey%20King%20Shit.png" width="320" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p>I'd like to believe George has the answers but unfortunately he doesn't. I'd like to say I consider him wise but I can only consider him educated - but also very foolish. There's no easy answer despite he saying there is and it's artificial meat and more standard farming and standard food processing and - anyway... I mourn the person I once considered an example. </p><p>What we actually need is for actual unsolicited research to be done. Not something generated at the behest of a food corporation that's only trying to prove that their particular brand of not very well researched, designed, and manufactured foodstuff is less toxic than "the stuff those other manufacturers pump out."</p><p>And we'll only start getting such unbiased and concentrated research happening as the crises accumulate and come up against the seawall and wash over it... </p><h2>Manufactured Meat Concerns:</h2><div>We don't know yet how the different organs of the bodies of almost any animals work. We know in overview - <i>blood takes oxygen from the lungs and expires CO2, takes energy from the gut, carries that oxygen and energy around to cells which absorb and use it to make more cells, do useful work, etc.</i> </div><p>But for instance - how is that cell controlled exactly? We know so much about these mechanisms and yet we know almost nothing about them yet. In the human body, for example, a lot's been said about the "mind-gut" connection. Alter your gut bacteria and what they get to eat, and you change how parts of your brain function, and thus how you function. Why and how this works we're going to learn eventually, but for now, let's go with this: "You are what you eat" is one of those truisms we shouldn't overlook. </p><p>Sometimes when my gut bacteria are happy I feel energetic and in a good mood that nothing seems able to break. And when I have poor digestion and only been eating poor foods, I actually can't help feeling depressed and looking at the world through grey-coloured glasses. So for me a serve of meat is a boost. </p><p>But <i style="font-weight: bold;">why</i> exactly is it? Is it the cells of the meat alone? Is it the trace elements that the meat absorbed from the blood, from the lymph? Is it some traces of a hormone that came from the animal's liver? Or endocrine gland? If I drained out everything that wasn't a structural meat cell and cooked with that, would it taste and smell the same? </p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXJ6lIGNTMsARlo5tk_t0HPEpMkB17Ye_pkiEV4OYqUHTEDeffr0GVUxMhU__cG5ey6RbzFDrdROlsxSCBr9wCisVE12pG19GVns4-sVIzu7fZ2qPiRDXZi9c9YUCp8iJdZTaaicNQ4Dvz2BV11h4nQLrr2eRC9eg6f0vQCyuI4gg97v3Sr3TY5g/s252/NYsoilGone.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="252" data-original-width="251" height="252" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXJ6lIGNTMsARlo5tk_t0HPEpMkB17Ye_pkiEV4OYqUHTEDeffr0GVUxMhU__cG5ey6RbzFDrdROlsxSCBr9wCisVE12pG19GVns4-sVIzu7fZ2qPiRDXZi9c9YUCp8iJdZTaaicNQ4Dvz2BV11h4nQLrr2eRC9eg6f0vQCyuI4gg97v3Sr3TY5g/s1600/NYsoilGone.png" width="251" /></a></div><p><br /></p><h3 style="text-align: left;">The Rabbit Disease Timebomb</h3><p>Would it produce as much nourishment for me? Or would it be - lacking - something? For example: rabbit is a very easy to grow food source. It was also a very easy to obtain wild food a hundred years ago. But people who lived off the land and ate almost exclusively rabbit and berries would go to town after a year out in the wild, and shit themselves to death. They'd arrive spindly and ill and feverish, and leave feet first. </p><p>Because yes, rabbit meat is very good, it's lean and tasty and plentiful. But it has no fats. Well, a negligible quantity. People who lived on this exact diet were said to have caught "rabbit disease." Had they kept some of those rabbits and fed them extremely well before slaughtering them, they'd have survived, because those rabbits would have developed quite a lot of fat. But because the Monbiot-like ignoring of a biological fact - that we <i style="font-weight: bold;">need</i> fats and preferably animal fats - those wilderness dwellers died in droves. </p><p>And such are my main concerns. We can eat "vat rabbit" for a year or two and feel all right. But then what? Who wants to be the guinea pig for something like that? </p><p>Those women who were prescribed thalidomide weren't aware of anything wrong - they felt better for months and months. It was only after the birth that the problems became obvious, and by then it was too late. Some of the people who relied on olestra in food to lower their fat levels developed lifelong digestive illnesses. After several years. </p><p>People who were advised to avoid animal fats and consume hydrogenated fats instead for the sake of their health, developed metabolic sysndrome and got Type 2 diabetes and similar illnesses. People who without their knowledge were given foods containing soyabean oil now have genetic damage. Anyone who drinks any water that hasn't been microfiltered to remove PFAS are consuming levels of those substances way above recommended safe levels and at risk of reproductive dysfunction or already have it.</p><p>If you ate anything "white" a few decades and up to a few centuries ago it was treated with a bleach - white sugar and white flour chief among them. And the bleach caused oxidative inflammatory damage and made the consumers of those things more prone to arterial plaques, heart conditions, and possibly increased their risk of cancer by considerable margins. </p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Sorry George...</h2><p>Our ancestors were subject to food fraud. Bread was routinely adulterated in various ways, crops contaminated with other weeds or detritus sold as pure, any meat you could get was likely to be something else as what it purported to be. (<i>My parents lived in Austria during WWII and they mentioned that if you could buy meat or fish at all, you just didn't ask what it was or where it came from. And really, all that's changed nowadays is that there isn't a WWIII going on. . .</i>)</p><p>I can go to the supermarket right now and pick up a piece of "snapper" that more likely came off a species of shark, "Australian" prawns that were raised and farmed in Vietnam and somehow "slipped" into Aussie prawns so now you can't use any of that pack for fish bait because it might spread white spot to our local seafood. </p><p>If the garlic isn't a little bit wilted and doesn't have an "Australian grown" label on it then I have no idea where it comes from. I'm going to pray it comes from Spain or somewhere other than China where it's routinely grown in human shit and then washed in what amounts to ditch water before being rolled around with feet into piles where people sit on the ground and fill it into boxes and bags. </p><p>Same with olive oil - I know a few olive groves in Australia but I have no idea if ALL the oil they sell came off their trees or was imported from Italy to bulk their own oil out a bit. If the latter then it's over 90% certain that it isn't anything like olive oil they're adding because no other industry in the world can consistently produce twice as much oil as they harvest without there being some bullshit involved. </p><p>I get our honey from local farm and that only because I'm fairly certain they don't adulterate their product with imported syrup purporting to be honey. Frozen berries that arrive here as "Produced in New Zealand" aren't, they're Chinese frozen berries sent here via NZ because of labelling laws. </p><p>Orange juice is not made from oranges but orange juice concentrate (<i>mostly squeezed from real oranges and then concentrated</i>) and if the concentrate you bought was the crop of ten tons of oranges, you'd dilute it with fifteen tons' worth of water and add a chemical flavour pack. Why? "Because the customers want a consistent flavour" is the answer you'll get - but the truth is that the company just succesfully parlayed ten tons of oranges into fifteen tons' worth of orange juice for the cost of five extra tons of water and a bucket of orange Tang. </p><p>Milk is similarly adulterated - farmers are paid by weight of milk solids, which are then diluted with water and somehow the milk solids that are extracted out of 1000 litres of milk become 1700 litres of milk on the shelf. </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">What's The Answer?</h2><p>Not George. Not Pollan, either. And definitely not any system that depends on capitalism and a "bottom line" rather than consideration, landcare, and stewardship. </p><p>Not "bioreactors" and bacteria vats either. There's a reason behind the shapes and tastes and textures of vegetables. They are the way they are because relentless selection pressure has worked in both directions - we've sought them out for their health-giving nutrition, managed them, and finally farmed them. I can with 100% certainty say that nothing we're doing in factories, vats, and "reactors" will actually result in healthy human beings. </p><p>George is very gung-ho about bacterial slurry, because he seems to not know or even deliberatley overlook some quite well-established nutritional research results. But as intelligent as he is about soil nutrition (<i>and even draws parallels between the four major bacteria present in both plant and human nutrition systems</i>) he seems to think that while the soil has definite nutrition requirements, human requirements can be safely ignored. </p><p>He skirts the issues of manure/fertiliser/sewage that are really simple to break down into a few simple rules:</p><p></p><ol style="text-align: left;"><li>Every human ultimately consumes nutrition and energy from the soil and the sun.</li><li>Every human produces in their lifetime as many trace nutrients, fertiliser, and energy as they consumed over that lifetime.</li></ol><p></p><p>And they are the two great rules. For the purposes of completeness you can substitute anything for the word "human" in each of those rules. We've been ignoring them for hundreds of years and that's the biggest problem with our food system right now.</p><p>Do you want to produce vegetables for cities? Do it IN the cities. It's easier to separate out food and human waste right there before it gets mixed in with the entire industrial waste stream. Because the reason for the food system failures we're getting is simple. We currently don't give a shit. Literally. Find the microbiomes around the city (<i>and NOT in the lands spoiled by farms</i>) and start your vertical farm by growing <i style="font-weight: bold;">them</i>. Start the way Nature does - start from the basics - trace elements, bacterial populations. </p><p>Grow plants in a FULL ecosystem - if have to include insects and animals and supporting plant populations to grow the food crops - that's the price for attaining full nutritive value again. TANSTAAFL. There Ain't No Such Things As A Free Lunch. But we WILL get ourselves back in balance this way.</p><p>When families lived on the farm it was pretty easy to. You went and excreted in the field. Your waste food and poop went back out into the garden and the field. There wasn't usually much 'waste' food so mainly poop. And you peed in the field too. Or carried out the night pot and emptied it out there. The thing was that all that nutrient for the soil stayed in the soil. People poop and pee out roughly as many nutrients and trace elements as they consume. </p><p>What they don't excrete is the energy that they burn up in moving and living, but luckily the plants that take up all that material add the energy back in with photosynthesis. See how clever it all is, and how simple it all was?</p><p>But eventually we had villages where people kept some gardens but their flour and bulk food might have come off local farms. Sort of - kind of - overall - the resources remained in the same general region though. But that's not the case now, is it? </p><p>Our excrement goes into the same ponds as stormwater and so collects rubber residues, oils, and detergent compounds, and becomes toxic to the soil. We do sort of use some of the waste for fertilisers but it's mixed up with all the less desirable stuff. </p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguxVqVlzkGV29iZ0NRauklGL3p6haZYhVN99fzBHECIB3YD9rDoB3sJSx26qC3jfokxtaW2UcK3b62rIhSkYdFxEQq9YY7jauv5xqs-WYnXhgNh7d_1Lqp6-iHUbNT0-pzDxlBl9QHrHYONB88LhhjLffQT9xMTUgsQ4Ul-r6cu-9p_WHZ7VQM9w/s640/cedarmothsfly.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="360" data-original-width="640" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguxVqVlzkGV29iZ0NRauklGL3p6haZYhVN99fzBHECIB3YD9rDoB3sJSx26qC3jfokxtaW2UcK3b62rIhSkYdFxEQq9YY7jauv5xqs-WYnXhgNh7d_1Lqp6-iHUbNT0-pzDxlBl9QHrHYONB88LhhjLffQT9xMTUgsQ4Ul-r6cu-9p_WHZ7VQM9w/s320/cedarmothsfly.png" width="320" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p>So some re-working of sewers is needed. And if you think that's a lot of hard work, remember that we put the not so great sewer systems in to take away diseases that were killing people in cities, and that was considered worthwhile enough that every city has a sewer system and far less disease. Once it becomes obvious to everyone that we now need TWO sewer systems, we'll do it. Hopefully we'll move before the tidal wave washes over the wall . . .</p><p>But once you have this separate system, and a decent food waste service, you'll be more than halfway to being able to farm the food for a city, in the city, using mostly the city's resources. Energy is becoming cheaper. Perhaps we'll be able to mechanise the partitioning of the sewer system, the processing of the fertiliser portions, the composting, and the delivery to local farms. </p><p>So do you want to produce vegetables for cities? If you can do that, you can grow good crops in good soils in great enclosed vertical farms. If you can be bothered to use a heat still to distill waste water as well, you'll have clean water to grow the crops with. Cheaper energy, remember? There's one of the keys. </p><p>There's a lot of interest in growing vegetable crops in such small, intensive, vertical, and very mechanised farms. A lot of progress has been made in the technology and (<i>I'm going to get so tired of saying this but it's true</i>) technology's pace itself is accelerating so that there are hundreds of times more researchers on each of the targets we'll need to reach, so it seems almost certain that we'll see some changes in farming practices. </p><p>The changes that we'll need socially and societally will be a bit harder to achieve though. We'll have to get used to some things like - farmers who operated Standard Farms will need to be recompensed for switching to regenerative agriculture. That's just a given, you can't just shut down existing farmland and tell the farmer "that's it, pack up, piss off, go to town." but what will have to be done is to enforce no more fertiliser and pesticicde use and instead use crop and animal diversity to manage those just as they once were. </p><p>We need to lower people's food expectations. Flawless apples and perfect carrots are a Standard Farm product and not compatible. If you want those, the City Vertical Farms will have to manage such produce. </p><p>And we need to make sure that the whole economy of farming becomes a bit more distributed and equally shared. Basically, capitalism will have to be dismantled for this to happen. And before you think it can't happen, remember that our modern economy based on that neoliberal free-market-adjusted capitalism only came about in the last few hundred years and isn't a particularly stable edifice itself. </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Things Really Boil Down To</h2><p>We need to become better stewards of our spacecraft. We need to eliminate non-core goals. And capitalism is as non-core as it can get. Really. Just re-read the first sentence of this paragraph. We humans aren't good at seeing big overview pictures, nor at seeing longer-term patterns. But we need to learn, whether that's with or without AI, Gods, Flying Spaghetti Monsters, or "financial objectives." </p><p>We've become somewhat less than human because we've been less than Earthlings in our handling of the planet. What it takes is intensive study of natural microbiomes, and learning to apply those to our foods again. The link between gut biome health and body/mental health is now established beyond reasonable doubt, but we have work to do. </p><h4 style="text-align: left;">BONUS: We'll learn how to set up our food systems on other planets. Assuming we still want to colonise those once we understand how unique and delicately-balanced our existence here is and how worthwhile.</h4><p>This planet is a way for us to move through space. It is in every sense of the word a spacecraft. Without it and the paper-thin shell of atmosphere, we all die horrible deaths. Without the "electronics" inside the planet of rotating magnetic cores generating a shield from cosmic radiation, we'd burn slowly, painfully, over the course of a few hours. Without the life support system, this would be a parched lump of rock and sand, without so much as a lichen growing for food. </p><p>That's not some bullshit doomsday scenario. That's the grim truth of it. Look at the other planets, each missing some crucial factor - too close t the Sun, too distant. Scorched or icy. Some rotate too slowly, some too fast. Or have no molten metal core to form magnetic fields to put shields up against the merciless solar and space radiations. </p><p>We can't just build a huge cylinder in space and set it rotating. It would take decades to centuries for us to get as far as it would take to find just the material. To shield against the radiation the walls would have to be specialised and thicker than current spacecraft skins. To be able to generate gravity, it would need to be massive. Then it would take decades or more to establish an ecosystem that balanced as well as Earth's. </p><p>To be clear - gravity is not optional, if we want to remain human in form. Also if we wanted to make an Ark of it and allow us to take the entire ecosystem (<i>that we depend on in ways we're still not sure of</i>) with us. In short, <i style="font-weight: bold;">nothing</i> except a copy of Earth will ever prevent us from turning into a new species - or going extinct. We are truly all that dependent on this exact habitat. </p><p>And it sucks to be an astronaut, even within the protective shield of the magnetosphere they lose bone density and critical muscles if they stay in space for more than a few weeks, and recovery and rehabilitation to the planet is strenuous and difficult. In order to become adapted to space in physiology and genetics, we'll have to become something other than <i>homo sapiens</i> in order to do so. Also, in order to live on another planet, it would either have to be within a micropercentage of identical to Earth, or else we'd have to become a different species.</p><p>So for <i style="font-weight: bold;">US</i>, right here and right now, it's important that the planet can support our lives. </p><p>Farming in <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/tale-two-farmers-industry-faces-074404754.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the <i style="font-weight: bold;">right</i> way</a> is one things we need to do right away. Another is to stop using dirty fossil fuels. Remember our magnetosphere, that depends on a core that rotates in a certain way? Well, how much longer is it going to rotate if we've actually <a href="https://www.space.com/earth-tilt-changed-by-groundwater-pumping" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">shifted the Earth's axial tilt</a>? And remember that while we're reasonably versatile, we're also facing a declining birthrate. Could it be because <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fish-hatchery-silverhead-salmon-genetics/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">we've domesticated ourselves</a>? </p><p></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;">For the people that don't like to follow the links and read for themselves, the first article is about a growing tension between farmers who recognise that we need to reduce our footprint on the planet and are starting to use regenerative agriculture, and the farmers that are embedded in a capitalistic contract system and want to just make money, make money, and make more money.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">The second link is to an article which quotes a study that has found that our pumping of groundwater has caused a tiny shift in the Earth's tilt. And of course our magnetic field depends on the rotation of the core of molten metal inside, which is dragged along with the Earth's rotation - along the equator of its axial tilt... </span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">And the last article discusses how farmed fish are less able to survive and breed in the wild (<i>for reasons still not clear, but I have a few clues a few paragraphs further down</i>) despite being genetically identical. </span></p></blockquote><p></p><p>We really REALLY need to stop capitalism and greed, and start realising that we really are "all in the same boat" and that it's a <i>lifeboat</i> and our lives really do depend on that lifeboat being in good working order and that everything else is so far down the hierarchy of importance as to be risible. </p><p>I can offer you one piece of <a href="https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWJjLm5ldC5hdS9yYWRpb25hdGlvbmFsL2ZlZWQvMjg4MzA5OC9wb2RjYXN0LnhtbA/episode/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWJjLm5ldC5hdS9yYWRpb25hdGlvbmFsL3Byb2dyYW1zL2JpZ2lkZWFzL2NvbXBsZXhpdGllcy1vZi1zYWZlZ3VhcmRpbmctZW5kYW5nZXJlZC1zcGVjaWVzLzEwMjQ4MTQzMg?ep=14 " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Down Under philosophy 101</a> to explain a bit about why genetically identical living creatures can lose their natural fitness to survive in just one generation of domestication. It's because we've taken them out of their "natural culture" and now they've lost the other important survival mechanism, their culture. </p><p>Those salmon didn't just "magically know" where their spawning grounds are. No matter how much we humans want to deny it, each species has only a certain number of "instincts" built into their genome. The rest is learned from their community. </p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #2b00fe; font-family: arial;">There's an interesting side concept I'm finding developing here, and that's the idea that culture, language, communication, and myth are all necessary for life to get past a certain stage. In other words, we're more than our genetics, we're also formed by our culture and our conversations and our knowledge. This is worth a whole series of longer posts and I've now started a research and outline on it. Stay tuned. </span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p>Anyway - this explains why we're in the situation we're currently in. By not exploring all these linkages before exploiting things, we've disrupted a large part of a larger narrative, if you like, and will need to repair that in order for things to return to a more liveable state. </p><p>We need to acknowledge that we're only one group of things called Earthlings, and Earthlings are parts of Earth. No I'm not promoting some kumbaya religious nuttery, I'm saying that every living creature on the planet, every drop of water, and every particle of geological and atmospheric material on the planet.</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-YFCC0GAA7bXeFuBXZO7URqFdTp83OETbcinbnSYCxU-KwAFSl0lXAtlOgxi3aAeWRi4x8zJW0EyxhOAIPJk2QgxFLEtI925mwujeLig_anWsblkcn18aSN7uDyRLwJQm2i17C3-UkVPNQY4b_nRzzH7wD-rBgbS_xTBxRcZof8LKvNPJ1HKSdQ/s506/fossilplay4qw4.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="257" data-original-width="506" height="163" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-YFCC0GAA7bXeFuBXZO7URqFdTp83OETbcinbnSYCxU-KwAFSl0lXAtlOgxi3aAeWRi4x8zJW0EyxhOAIPJk2QgxFLEtI925mwujeLig_anWsblkcn18aSN7uDyRLwJQm2i17C3-UkVPNQY4b_nRzzH7wD-rBgbS_xTBxRcZof8LKvNPJ1HKSdQ/s320/fossilplay4qw4.png" width="320" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p>We can't ever become a part of another ecosystem, we're stuck on this ship. And greed and capitalism almost destroyed it. We are now in the situation where we DON'T HAVE TO be greedy. We DON'T HAVE TO exploit any more of the planet's resources. We DON'T HAVE TO do the hard work any more to survive, because we can mechanise and automate almost everything. And we DON'T HAVE TO dig up new resources or burn resources for energy because we can give the task of recycling, building new renewable energy sources, building more recycling facilities, making more machines to do that and then look after our needs.</p><p>And DON'T HAVE TO take food out of another's mouth or the roof from over their heads. </p><p>We can do this right now if we eliminate the need to create "profits" and "value" from everything, and just settle for "fixing what we have already."</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p><br /></p><p>Share share share these sorts of posts. Share THIS post. Click in the minibanner above and subscribe to my newsletter, send me a payment to help keep these posts going. Talk to others about it. And</p><h4 style="text-align: center;">Keep The Bastards Honest!</h4><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-86021993935543117882023-06-30T07:08:00.024+08:002023-06-30T07:16:59.562+08:00Eggs, Lies, And Eggy BS<h4 style="text-align: left;">The makings of a classical "supply shortage" <a href="https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2023/06/25/egg-shortages" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">are here in this article</a>.</h4><p>If you read it and think "oh those poor supermarkets, those poor egg farmers" then you're the exact customer that they want. Here's a quick recap of the article:</p><p><i>Oh dear, we don't know how it happened but the demand for eggs is outstripping supply, it'd be a pity if we started people hoarding eggs the way they did with pasta and toilet paper! And it's all due to eggs being one of the cheaper sources of protein available now that all prices are rising and so we'd better justify raising prices on eggs, too. Oh why oh why do our customers want so much protein anyway? </i></p><p><b>UPDATE: I noticed that commercials exhorting customers to use eggs and more eggs and more eggs, </b><b> which leads me to wonder if they're serious about any "consistent customer experience" other than the distinct sensation of being conned, bent over, and shafted soundly...</b></p><p>Well, that's a paraphrase but anyway - have a read and then my incisive take on the situation... 😺😹</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">The Panic Button</h2><p>Here's a section from the article, interspersed with observations:</p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">Australian Eggs managing director . . . said there was “clearly a gap between egg supply and demand at present, but this seems to be mainly demand driven”.</span></p><p>If the same number or more are being produced and people aren't buying more then this demand MUST be manufactured. (<i>Cue warehouse with eggs. Like they do with meat and fruit and vegetables.</i>)</p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">“Australia’s population is growing, and . . . people are looking to more affordable proteins to get food on the table,” he said.</span></p><p>So - the MD is complicit. He wants you to believe that the entire egg production industry suddenly forgot to take population growth into account, after decades of it being a common factor they've always considered. They want to make the "more affordable proteins," <i style="font-weight: bold;">less affordable</i>. - For you and me, not them. </p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">“This is contributing to stronger demand for eggs than anticipated and the industry will have to play catch up to fill the gap.”</span></p><p>"Catch up?" As I just said, if population increase demand had been properly taken care of (and I believe - despite voicing a suspicion in my last paragraph - that in all likelihood it + WAS) then either supermarkets have figured out a way to drive customers into and egg-hoarding toilet-paper-storing frenzy - or - the more simple answer - they've been stockpiling eggs to create demand. (<i>Cue warehouse with eggs. Like they do with meat and fruit and vegetables.)</i></p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">According to Australian Eggs, a member-owned non-profit that provides marketing and research and development for Australian egg farmers, supply hasn’t faltered, with an average of 18.5 million eggs produced each day and 6.5 billion a year.</span></p><p>And while I hate to cast aspersions on these Stewards of<i> </i>Scrambled, Soft-boiled, Scotched, Sandwich, and Sunny-side-up spheroids, it's also been known for these Stalwarts to Sometimes Sneakily Stash in order to drive up prices. (<i>Cue warehouse with eggs. Like they do with meat and fruit and vegetables.</i>)</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVPIet8YqjkKKCMe_k1LZH5k78-UveB_6gi2P24aJTw2v7zT730Ggg33IX_zH3dGo9WFpgnQHo_5qywZR11lrDqvXg3X5jBH3kBUW7iP8jvyOBvNJ0XqOZG3hEnsuyi0kSxy8hYgdP-iFpcsGFoxZuKRcJI3VbTy27z0qUTbRModmGybqHOAYemA/s498/seemenoeggs.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="374" data-original-width="498" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVPIet8YqjkKKCMe_k1LZH5k78-UveB_6gi2P24aJTw2v7zT730Ggg33IX_zH3dGo9WFpgnQHo_5qywZR11lrDqvXg3X5jBH3kBUW7iP8jvyOBvNJ0XqOZG3hEnsuyi0kSxy8hYgdP-iFpcsGFoxZuKRcJI3VbTy27z0qUTbRModmGybqHOAYemA/s320/seemenoeggs.png" width="320" /></a></div><p><span style="font-family: courier;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">“There might be a bit of competition for eggs, but we are a long way from the COVID scenario,” Mr McMonnies said.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">“Even patchy shelves have eggs on them, and consumers that need eggs will be able to get them.”</span></p><p>Okay that sounds like a cue to start stampedes. Ignore them, just buy what you need when you need. And if you so desperately need that protein - cook with dried chickpeas and beans occasionally, they're not bad, and add a lot of other nutrients to your diet as well. Meanwhile back to The BS Castle: </p><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: courier;">Supermarkets point to increased costs in production and poor weather as a reason for recent egg shortages, despite an increase in supply in recent months after a difficult 18 months for the industry.</span></div><p>"<i>Despite an increase in supply</i>" ???????? How many question marks do I have to put after that to make it stand out like dog doings in an egg carton? If there's "increased supply" then what? - they're blaming greedy shoppers? (<i>"Oh not you, Sir or Madam. YOU are our valued customer. But you know <b>those</b> other ones, the ones in poverty and hunger. <b>Their</b> cheapness and greed know no bounds."</i>)</p><p><span style="font-family: courier;">A Coles spokesperson said the supermarket was continuing to monitor supply and was working hard with suppliers to improve availability for customers.</span></p><p>No. No they're not. The previous paragraph from the article makes it clear that it's time to "<i>Cue warehouse with eggs. Like they do with meat and fruit and vegetables.</i>" Not ALL the shrinkage of egg stocks is down to those greedy hungry slimebags that are just trying to cheap out on their protein supplies. (<i>In fact, the supermarkets' shameless price gouging has put those people into the bracket where they can't afford meat protein any more.</i>) Nope - but expect to be buying shitty eggs that have been carefully managed from room temperature to the <i style="font-weight: bold;">PRECISE</i> temperature at which eggs can be stored for years, and then stored for years to be sold when a new price shift happens. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">What reasons could they have to do all that? </h3><p>I'm talking about things like this: The supermarket giants' spokespersons have said in the past that they have enough frozen meat in their warehouses to allow them to supply demand for up to thirty years. Yep, you heard that right, meat can be safely stored for decades if your food scientists have done their research and know the <i style="font-weight: bold;">PRECISE</i> temperature at which meat will store forever, know the <i style="font-weight: bold;">PRECISE</i> length of time to spend in gradually reducing the temperature of that meat until it hits optimum temperature, and if you can keep the variations of temperature to less than a degree or two, then Farmer Brown's old Bessie can become practically immortal.</p>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div>
<p>The same goes for a LOT MORE produce than you may think. And now you might remember a story that came up around a decade ago about a few tons of mystery meat in China that had been moved between coolrooms and freezers - for <i style="font-weight: bold;">over thirty years!!!</i> - and that was still being added to many food products before the authorities finally destroyed it when they discovered it. And you might think "Why the hell does my supermarket want to do something so seemingly shonky?"</p><p>And so I can tell you why they do it. For instance, in 1900, prime rump steak was around sixpence a pound. I can't recall where I spotted that little factoid but it seems about right, and would mean that a kilo at the time would have cost you around about a shilling. A shilling from 1900 would be the equivalent of $4.50 - $5.00 today. But a kilo of of prime rump is now about $22/kg. </p><p>In 1901 terms, it's as if that kilo of meat had gone up by a factor of almost five times. And I'm being a bit conservative with estimating inflation, which has accelerated much faster in the latter half of the last hundred years. So now it can be explained:</p><p>Supermarket buys 100 tons of rump steak in 1990 at $350 a ton, and can sell it at about $700 a ton at 1990 prices. But if they "permafreeze" half of it back then and were to sell it now, they'll get $1,200 a ton for it. And if they can also create an artificial stampede for it, $2,000 a ton. Those are attractive margins. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">How do I know they'd actually do this?</h3><p>Because we're talking about supermarkets that will sell you an apple that's been meticulously coolroom warehoused for several years without mentioning how long it's been in storage. That buy just the milk solids of ten kilolitres of milk from the dairy farmer, then store five kilolitres and water the rest down to ten kilolitres of "fresh milk." </p><p><br /></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju23bZgRR6HL_buSQ3Vktdd_zrf6uSjCWVGJvRYbGaA3oW79CggxHxeXmyhg_X81R08MPFNGlCUJeXy011IlZciwf51dtYxKGw3cFFRovaYCjzqvpmzPwsk7psaW96_-nD7Ni-sF33j2x5NkafLj3mzIqsx8RAgTDBEeXK6GqEn1CFHw8L02IXTA/s250/greed002.png" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="246" data-original-width="250" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju23bZgRR6HL_buSQ3Vktdd_zrf6uSjCWVGJvRYbGaA3oW79CggxHxeXmyhg_X81R08MPFNGlCUJeXy011IlZciwf51dtYxKGw3cFFRovaYCjzqvpmzPwsk7psaW96_-nD7Ni-sF33j2x5NkafLj3mzIqsx8RAgTDBEeXK6GqEn1CFHw8L02IXTA/s1600/greed002.png" width="250" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>Nope - No eggs anywhere!</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br /></p><p>And yes - they make no secret of this, saying they do things like that to provide a "consistent quality of product for the consumer" - without mentioning that they're also magically doubling their income along the way AND keeping stocks of freeze-dried milk solids as a backup so that when the dairy farmers get too uppity on price they can just drop their contracts for a year or two and keep supplying milk but now with an apparently justified price increment "due to those greedy farmers" as well... </p><p>Do you understand this? Things like computer chips age out - not because they degrade but because progress overtakes them and so they date pretty quickly. New chips and components come along that are smaller and faster and draw less power and provide more functions, and the warehouse full of last year's top mobile phone processor chips? Well, best luck trying to move them this year with the new teraflop gigacore processors selling for the same price or cheaper.</p><p>Meat, milk, eggs, fruit, vegetables, and flour. sugar, and salt on the other hand are pretty much immortal when preserved in cool rooms and microcontrolled freezers. And so, supermarkets must be finding that building freezing facilities and storage facilities pays for itself otherwise they wouldn't be doing it. And their profits are our costs...</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Your Takeaway:</h2><p style="text-align: left;">Don't believe the hype. Don't stockpile eggs. There's only so far that the supermarkets can push a shorting of eggs, and if people don't pay their inflated prices, they'll be stuck with egg. In stores, in warehouses, and on their faces (one hopes) - so share this post, share it share it share it and the more people see it the fewer gullible victims there'll be to be ripped off.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Share This Article Share This Article Share This Article !!!</h3><h3 style="text-align: left;">BTW: </h3><p style="text-align: left;">Here's a little list of ways you can have eggs: </p><div style="text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Scrambled eggs</li><li>Sunny-side up</li><li>Soufflé</li><li>Shakshuka</li><li>Scotch eggs</li><li>Spanish omelette</li><li>Strata</li><li>Shirred eggs</li><li>Soft-boiled eggs</li><li>Spaghetti carbonara</li><li>Scotch egg roll</li><li>Sausage and egg casserole</li><li>Scotch egg pie</li><li>Sambal telur (Indonesian dish)</li><li>Scrambled egg sandwich</li><li>Scrambled egg burrito</li><li>Scrambled egg wrap</li><li>Scrambled egg muffin</li><li>Smoked salmon eggs Benedict</li><li>Spinach and feta omelette</li><li>Spinach and mushroom frittata</li><li>Spanish tortilla</li><li>Scrambled egg tacos</li><li>Scotch egg curry</li><li>Scotch egg salad</li><li>Shrimp and egg fried rice</li><li>Smoked salmon scramble</li><li>Spinach and cheese strata</li><li>Spanish-style baked eggs</li><li>Spinach and goat cheese omelette</li></ul>
</div>
<div align="center"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameborder="no" height="95px" scrolling="no" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" style="border: 1px #FFFFFF none;" title="iFrame1" width="190px"></iframe></div><p style="text-align: left;">Like it? Please use the little mini-banner here to donate or subscribe. Thank you!</p><p><br /></p>
teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-40449315730808005322023-06-11T23:00:00.013+08:002023-06-11T23:00:00.191+08:00I'm Not A Fascist, But<p> </p><h4>... would we even recognise it for what it is, these days? </h4><p>I like Eco's thinking, and have followed it through the Rose, the Pendulum, and Numero and have sort of nibbled at the other four books and I'm aware he has some 20-30 nonfiction works at least, (<i>Actually, here's <a href="https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/umberto-eco/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a biblio of Eco</a>.</i>) I remember reading The Name Of The Rose after whetting my appetite with Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code (<i>And here are <a href="https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/dan-brown/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">his books</a></i>) had my interest all piqued, and my father suggested I might like to read a "better class of fiction" as he called it. It was, I found and read Foucault's Pendulum and then started opportunistically picking up Eco books in libraries whenever I lived near one.</p><p>Now there's <a href="https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a piece on OpenCulture</a> about Eco's experiences with fascism and I've extracted the fourteen features of fascism according to Eco:</p><ol><li><b>The cult of tradition.</b> “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”</li><li><b>The rejection of modernism.</b> “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”</li><li><b>The cult of action for action’s sake.</b> “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”</li><li><b>Disagreement is treason.</b> “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”</li><li><b>Fear of difference.</b> “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.”</li><li><b>Appeal to social frustration.</b> “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.”</li><li><b>The obsession with a plot.</b> “Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged.”</li><li><b>The enemy is both strong and weak.</b> “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”</li><li><b>Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy.</b> “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.”</li><li><b>Contempt for the weak.</b> “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”</li><li><b>Everybody is educated to become a hero.</b> “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”</li><li><b>Machismo and weaponry.</b> “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”</li><li><b>Selective populism.</b> “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.”</li><li><b>Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak.</b> “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.”</li></ol><p></p><p></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;"></span></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;">This abridged list (available in full at The New York Review of Books) comes to us from Kottke, by way of blogger Paul Bausch, who writes “we have a strong history of opposing authoritarianism. I’d like to believe that opposition is like an immune system response that kicks in.” -- </span></p><a href="https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html </a></blockquote><a href="https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html " rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><p></p></blockquote><p>And the article is right - we've satirised Fascism so much in the last decades that it's no longer clear what Fascism is - so how can we even guard against it? It's a hot button topic for me, not because I have a history of bad experiences with Fascism but because I (<i>and you and a large chunk of the world</i>) are dealing with Fascist governments and treatment <b><i>right now</i></b>. Pick any of the 14 points above and then compare it with your government and politicians - and then get ready for that cold shiver . . .</p><p>Because no one of those points comes into our lives alone, but seeing just one of them should be enough to get your Spidey senses tingling. VERY tingly. Not a single one of those listed signs is good for society, for wellbeing, or for peaceful living. </p><p><b>Tradition.</b><br />I can't even count how often right wing politicians bring out tradition as a reason for a particular action, a certain Law they want passed, or as a defence against some imagined evil about to pounce and destroy society. <i style="font-weight: bold;">Their</i> idea of a society, at any rate. Ironically enough, our RW party is opposing the indigenous population's having a voice in Parliament to allow their traditions to continue. "<i>It's a disaster! We'll all be back to living in caves and throwing boomerangs if they have their way!</i>" seems to be about as good as it gets.</p><p>BTW I've made and thrown boomerangs after listening to and practising with my indigenous schoolmates way back last century, I know how to fend for myself if I have to - and I then spent a good life getting into technology, electronics, communications, IT, newspaper publishing, community radio, and everything I'm doing nowadays. And I can still make a spear or boomerang and probably use it... </p><p>But of course OUR tradition is far more traditional than any tradition THEY could have. <i>Mum, beer, and meat pies, mate - 'Straya was founded on those!</i></p><p><b>Rejection of Modernism</b><br />Oh wow have I ever landed on the wrong side of the Fascists there, hey? I live for tech and tech solutions. I think science on the whole makes life much much better, I think people are coping better with the technology to manage their lives and environments, and - eventually - figure out how to manage their lives with it.</p><p>"<i>If only we could go back to the good old days!</i>" is their plaint, but take away: the guns and the medicine - oh and the safe water and food, the housing that wasn't freezing and damp in winter and hot and filled with wildlife in summer - and you'll have a riot on your hands.</p><p>Interestingly enough this is also A Thing with some non-Fascist people now too - I'm working on an article about AI, GPT, AGI, the Arts, and the future of work in general. Because this new advance is the work of the devil. Or Fascists. No not those Fascists, these fascists. No, not like that. Nazis. Or something.</p><p>But let's have mining and factories and land clearing because we want to have money to buy the latest technology. But then let's not get that latest technology - because who knows where that'll end? Look at how destructive disastrous and polluting mining and power generation are - this new tech stuff may end up being wayyyyy woooorrrrse! Augh!</p><p><b>Action, Not Thinking</b><br />This is pretty self-evident. And stupid. If we'd <i style="font-weight: bold;">thought</i> more about (<i>for the sake of being current, let's use the example of</i>) AI, and GPT in particular before <i style="font-weight: bold;">acting</i> to make money off it hand over fist but before we've even thought about how that was going to affect us, maybe we wouldn't be in this situation where no-one really knows anything, no-one knows what's next, and no-one thought about consequences.</p><p>But the same applied to DNA, GM, encryption, surveillance, and a host of other technologies where the most Left-wing of inventors and scientists started getting dollar signs in their eyes and said "<i>you know what? Fuck it, we'll make a few bucks and then a few more cleaning up the mess!</i>" and with that they slipped silently across the Divide... </p><p>It's the Geeks/Jocks situation, just with more grown-up names . </p><p>The next two are related -<br /><b>Disagreement</b> is treason, especially when it's<br /><b>Us and Them and They're different</b>. <br />This is what every cult, every religion, and every ruling class has relied on, it's us and our way or them and treason, where do you stand? Boomerangs or submarines? Come on, you have to decide if we keep you or kill you!</p><p>And that's the other aspect of Fascism - there's really no "us" or "them." <i style="font-weight: bold;">Everyone else</i> is a "them." In the end I'll kill everyone in town, then in my church group, then my family - before they get me. Because that's another aspect of Fascismo - it's very insecure and afraid. </p><p><b>Social Frustration</b><br />Why do some of the girls prefer smart geeks to me? I'm a great physical specimen, I can (<i>or already have</i>) father lots of kids and not sick around for any of them - hey! - I'm a gift to the planet's gene pool! Whaddya mean what's the square root of nine? Are you having a shot at me, <i style="font-weight: bold;">other person</i>? One a these days, mate. I promise ya a knuckle sammich. </p><p>Also, I am a goddamn bonafide HERO. That's what it means to be a Fascists RW guy. So that includes the <b>Everybody is educated to become a hero</b> part of the signs, too.</p><br />
<div align="center"><iframe style="border:1px #FFFFFF none" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" title="iFrame1" width="190px" height="95px" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" allow="fullscreen"></iframe></div>
<p>And it also explains the <b>obsession with a plot</b> part.<br />Life's tough, it's way tougher if you're stupid. Therefore, it's hard to work out if someone's on your side or not - better to assume that everyone including your family might just be against you. Including you, <i style="font-weight: bold;">other person</i>... I got my eye on you...</p><p><b>The enemy is both strong and weak.</b><br />And you never know just how good the <i style="font-weight: bold;">other person</i> is. You ridicule them for being weak but at the same time if you're bullying them then they're a "worthy and skillful opponent" so that you can't be seen as a bully. </p><p><b>Don't ever give an inch, stay strong!</b><br />The next plank. You can't make peace, you just have to keep on punchin' on. That's the next thing. Don't stop being <i style="font-weight: bold;">against</i> that <i style="font-weight: bold;">other</i>, because if you stop, you might have to talk, and if you talk, there's a chance that this clever and powerful enemy will gain the upper hand over you or at least point out to you how stupid and pitiful you actually are. And yeah - they'd totally do that, totally. They're <i style="font-weight: bold;">other</i>, ya know?</p><p>Of course, at the same time as drumming up protection against that enemy that's both to be pitied and yet is stronger than you are and might bully you if you let them, don't ever cut any slack for the weaker people in your camp. <b>Contempt for the weak. </b>But not us - no, we're not weak, just that the <i style="font-weight: bold;">other</i> might be stronger than us and they'd surely show us no mercy so we need to weed out the weeds. Hehehe - geddit? Geddit? </p><p><b>Machismo and weaponry.</b><br />Yes, Fascism seems also to be ideally suited to males. Funny thing that, seeing as how males have since almost forever been the ones that take charge and denigrate and depersonalise all <b><i>others</i></b>. Yes there've been matriarchal societies but we're not living in a time like that. Also - weapons are the only real way to generate money and progress in other technologies, and money is important in the current time because we haven't yet managed to get back to intrinsic values yet. </p><p><b>Selective populism.</b> <br />Vox pops are a fairly recent thing (<i>TV as a concept has only been around for a century and a half, and has only had wide reach for maybe the last sixty or seventy years</i>) and purport to represent the <i>Vox Populi</i> but through exerting control over the media you can control just <i>which</i> vox pops hit the airwaves. As has been demonstrated over and over, how you present a scene affects how the audience perceives it, so you have in effect an always-on propaganda publishing facility. </p><p><b>Ur-Fascist Newspeak.</b> <br />And with this, that explains commercials and news and most sitcoms and soaps perfectly does it not? "<i>This is how WE live, this is what we consider NORMAL, and this is how we expect YOU to behave too. Or become <b>the other</b>.</i>"</p><h2>That's a wrap?</h2><p>I don't know. There's such a lot tied up in this - it's how our governments keep acting even as they condemn Fascists in other countries - and that right there should already be a warning sign flashing on the page. (<i>Oh how I miss the blink attribute...</i>😹)</p><p>The thing with AI, AGI, GPT, Art, Work.</p><p>We don't learn. A few smart people realise there's an issue and try to raise awareness, but it gets swallowed up in opposing propaganda. Then when it's obvious there are gonna be some changes due to the new issue, everyone loses their minds, but by then the genie's out the bottle the cat's out the bag and the horse has bolted. </p><p>So now the thing with AI, AGI, GPT, Art, and Work.</p><p>People who weren't in the know on the progress being made in AI (<i>which includes almost everyone except the people doing AI and a few diehard geeks</i>) can't have foreseen the schemozzle that it's causing. And some of the people involved probably had good intentions and high morals. But it only takes a firing, or a very aggressive boss pulling you aside and laying down the law, to make things spin out of control. </p><p>Those of us watching it happen - I can't speak for anyone else, but I personally found it to be a Good Thing. But I'm an idealist, a peace-mongering hippie, and I tend to believe that people are smart enough to manage. </p><h3>Help Me Manage</h3><p>Go back up to the banner above and click on "donate" and "subscribe" and help me with my hippie hopes...</p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-25932377011413130902023-06-08T23:00:00.005+08:002023-06-10T19:32:54.450+08:00Two Government Wins<h4 style="text-align: left;"> Two By Two from <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/" target="_blank">RenewEconomy</a> today. RenewEconomy (<i>all links will be in the blog article for the "PTEC3D On Air" podcast listeners</i>) has a real focus on renewables and sustainable and I do recommend subscribing to their newsletter.</h4><p>(<i>No - I'm not affiliated/associated in any way with them, I'm giving an unsolicited testimonial.</i>)</p><p>The first two articles of theirs are to do with the two sides of a coin: <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/victoria-locks-in-ambitious-emissions-target-sets-course-for-95-pct-renewables-by-2035/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">setting an emissions target</a>, and then curbing the fossil fuel's dying snarling grabbing attempts to stay alive - <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/fossil-gas-death-spiral-regulator-sets-exit-fee-to-socialise-cost-of-mass-disconnection/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">by gouging their customers</a>. </p><h2>Who'll Think Of The Poor Corporations ?</h2><p>I'm glad to say that I predicted this a long time ago (<i>I'll have a link if I can ever find any of those posts</i>) that the fossil fuel industries would experience starvation just like any other animal, and snap and bite at everything they can reach - and in this case it's their customers - in an effort to prolong their life.</p><p>And it stands to reason, right? The Fossil Fue Cartel (<i>FFC</i>) as I call them, is <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corporation" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a corporation</a>. Check out definition 2. - <i>a body formed and authorized by law to act as a single person </i>... in other words, the "corp" refers to "<i>a single body</i>" but for the purposes of the law they treat the corporation as a human individual not just a body. Pity. They should have treated it as a predatory wild animal...</p><p>No-one (<i>I think?</i>) has analysed corporations as having biological behaviours. (<i>Actually, I'm wrong. There's at least this <a href="https://hbr.org/2016/01/the-biology-of-corporate-survival" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">handy dandy guide for corporations</a> analysed this way. So we do have a precedent.</i>) But we all know that a wild animal is most dangerous when it's dying, and the FFC is no exception.</p><p>And it's important, as your government is setting decarbonisation targets, emissions targets, etc; To email your politicians and make then aware of what the predictable reactions from the FFC are going to be. </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilFfdNwrIjj2RyoQqvHmeVf3AMuTAXDdfHahF0vWC9QoNiPNX3RGjCP0wYN8Qifk9pz_ADDOlIKhar9KwOOydV2Ims8Ar9NpfFv5_g24zErR6NpjzagG5XhXyzgVbvhAl9_05bi2kpzC7QAnSKQ_0T6L1KOriztT_DpMJBLlM9WG1Q6M-3PmN6vms_bw/s800/PowerGenStock001.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="602" data-original-width="800" height="241" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilFfdNwrIjj2RyoQqvHmeVf3AMuTAXDdfHahF0vWC9QoNiPNX3RGjCP0wYN8Qifk9pz_ADDOlIKhar9KwOOydV2Ims8Ar9NpfFv5_g24zErR6NpjzagG5XhXyzgVbvhAl9_05bi2kpzC7QAnSKQ_0T6L1KOriztT_DpMJBLlM9WG1Q6M-3PmN6vms_bw/s320/PowerGenStock001.png" width="320" /></a></div><p>Notice that as EVs are gaining in popularity, the FFC has already raised fuel prices far above what could reasonably be expected. It's not going to get better because they are losing their bottom line, and if they can't sell as much fuel in the future, they need to fill their bellies now. </p><p>Also note that we're all moving towards reducing the use of "virgin" plastic, that is, plastic produced from fossil fuel feedstock. Also please note that plastic is a <i style="font-weight: bold;">FOREVER</i> kind of material, like glass and aluminium - and note that we have highly efficient ways to recycle those and so save using virgin materials as much. <i style="font-weight: bold;">Of course</i> plastic is eminently recyclable, and of course that is <i style="font-weight: bold;">not</i> what the FFC wants because this is the second-most-lucrative market for their product. </p><p>So these sorts of shenanigans are to be expected, and we need to prime our politicians to look out for US and not the FFC...</p><h2>Now To Energy And Ducks</h2><p>Western Australia is a thinly-spread but sizeable population, and to their credit, their power transmission system has always struck me as being quite well-maintained. In most States, the energy companies charge "service" fees that they then don't use to service their power grid, and they have power outages regularly. In WA, there seemed to always be crews out working on the system grid, and so outages were fewer than here in Victoria. </p><p>But also the State lagged behind in renewable/sustainable energy, and relied on a lot of gas turbine plants to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/australias-first-2gwh-battery-is-aimed-at-eliminating-a-very-big-solar-duck-curve/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">tame the "Duck Curve"</a> as it's called. Check out <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_curve" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Wikipedia's Duck Curve article</a>. As I haven't been in WA for over a decade, I can't comment to their uptake of wind and solar energy generation but I imagine it'd be quite substantial as we have sun and wind aplenty there. </p><p>Their <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/first-battery-on-wa-grid-ready-to-go-in-boost-for-rooftop-solar-pv/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">first grid battery</a> is slowly going online and for all I know may already be in full production by now. It's also worth noting that each time we buy a battery system, it breaks previous records both locally and often internationally as well. </p><p>Australians also (<i>I think?</i>) broke records for speed of mobile phone adoption and distribution, quickly realising the advantages of this means of communication over the wired phone system, and we're also behind a lot of the technology we've been buying back in the products we import. We're so good at innovating and so bad at capitalising on our innovations...</p><h3>Help Me With My Innovation</h3><p>Go to the banner above and click the "Donate" link. Also click the subscribe link to receive my once-a-week Friday newsletter with all the latest posts in it. For podcast listeners, that's https://ko-fi.com/ptec3d and https://ohaicorona.com/teds-news-letter respectively. For readers, you can find me on Spotify at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ptec3d and also on Amazon, with Google Podcasts and more coming as I find the time to register with all of them. </p>
<div align="center"><iframe style="border:1px #FFFFFF none" src="https://ohaicorona.com/Minibanner.html" title="iFrame1" width="190px" height="95px" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" allow="fullscreen"></iframe></div>
teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-79055860744446903682023-05-18T13:07:00.000+08:002023-05-18T13:07:04.741+08:00Dust. It isn't fattening. It's deadly.<h4 style="text-align: left;">Please feel free to <a href="https://www.australianunions.org.au/campaigns/deadly-dust/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">sign this petition</a>. </h4><p>They say it's a "...debilitating and sometimes fatal but preventable lung disease..." but what they don't say is that it's also incurable, just like asbestosis and mesothelioma. </p><p>They also don't say that it's a dust we shouldn't even be creating, nor that other dust can also cause lung diseases, nor that the environment does depend on this latter, non-man-made, dust because it's in the form of dust that microbes and other organisms are able to absorb the nutrients, but all these things are true too.</p><p>So yes - do <a href="https://www.australianunions.org.au/campaigns/deadly-dust/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">sign the petition</a> because it may save someone from a lifetime of crippling disability and misery. But also remember all the other things about our planet that we should be balancing and managing better. </p><p style="text-align: center;">Be Earthlings! And keep the bastards honest!</p><p style="text-align: center;">And please visit my banner at the top of the page and donate and subscribe!</p><p style="text-align: left;"><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-54308504399370777082023-04-02T13:06:00.007+08:002023-04-03T05:13:53.768+08:00 Progress Report, April:<h4 style="text-align: left;">Garden is slowing way down.</h4><p style="text-align: left;">Tomatoes are still growing but no longer ripening as fast. I'm needing to post a few observations because the climate is definitely having an effect and I want to sort out a better plan of attack for growing more food in 2023/24. The gardens as they stand now have only been in place since spring/summer 2020 and it takes a few years to dial things in and <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2023/03/soil-transfusion-stat.html" target="_blank">get new soil working properly</a>.</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Today's Twodays Haul:</h2><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIoc2xKWTvRPxqNx0DfzQvqv2e4xQnVlq_yU_EJvXqUrqWFgsAGa5az09PPJwougkiyAJgpn09rX2s8T_uWvu0AO8dBRsa6gsWNMINldbhQgyfOEqW1kNRUppg5v3EB_2V1vmdpbKnPilpz7A59opz877tb5Iu21ZN2pAFr9n3HYrcTGIs6ss/s4080/20230401_150121.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2296" data-original-width="4080" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIoc2xKWTvRPxqNx0DfzQvqv2e4xQnVlq_yU_EJvXqUrqWFgsAGa5az09PPJwougkiyAJgpn09rX2s8T_uWvu0AO8dBRsa6gsWNMINldbhQgyfOEqW1kNRUppg5v3EB_2V1vmdpbKnPilpz7A59opz877tb5Iu21ZN2pAFr9n3HYrcTGIs6ss/s320/20230401_150121.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>The State Of Food Growing</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="text-align: left;">The collecting basket's about as full as any other two days' worth of fruit, but far fewer are fully ripe. Summer days getting short, also cloudy because this place loves clouds and humidity. Less sunlight == less ripening. I've also been trimming away any new growing shoots wherever I could find them, and have been cutting out the odd vine that no longer has fruit and is drying off. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Time to mention a thing: If you want the salad tomatoes for salad, grab them at the orange-with-a-bit-of-green stage and let them ripen in the warmth and light in the kitchen, they'll have a far tangier flavour. If you want to add them to tomato passata, sauce, or paste, get them at the stage of being red but just before softening. When they get that ripe the flavour is bland and sweet - perfect for sauces.</p><p style="text-align: left;">The pear-shaped tomatoes are paste tomatoes. Same thing applies, but also as they ripen the flesh to liquid ratio changes hence why they're called paste tomatoes. They also taste better if left to ripen and then turn into sauce etc.</p><p style="text-align: left;">There are a few green chilli peppers up there too - I've no idea what variety they were so I'll be (<i>CAUTIOUSLY!!! - and yes, thereby hangs a tale, and its name is Rocoto chillies . . .</i>) testing them soon for making a chilli sauce/relish/pickle/whatever. </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Timings And Re-timings:</h2><p style="text-align: left;">The tomatoes, chillies, and basils were planted between Christmas and January. That was way too late I suspect. Weather's strange these days. So I'm going to have a bit of a tabulation here:</p><p style="text-align: left;"></p><p style="text-align: left;"></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><b>Salad Tomatoes:</b> Did the best this year but there's still kilos on the vine that will now have to become fried green tomatoes, green tomato relish, and green tomato chutney. I estimate that it's produced well north of 12kg to date and there's another 3kg of green left. </li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><b>Paste Tomatoes:</b> These didn't start to bud and ripen until much later, and there are several reasons for that. I'll probably have to add the several kilos it produced to the green tomato products.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><b>Rocoto Chilli:</b> This one was also a bit sparse and unproductive but same reasons as the paste tomatoes. I know the issue and I'll get on top of it next year. Also, it peaked early with only a few fruit.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><b>Unknown Chilli:</b> This one started late as chillis do and is now doing reasonably well, I also know the reasons for that.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><b>Basils:</b> These could also have started a few weeks earlier and been way more productive, but that's also my mistake. The Greek basil has been a surprise runner in the field and I hope the plant will overwinter and run away again next year only far more so. </li></ul><p></p><p style="text-align: left;">Things are getting warm earlier so soils are ready to grow things but the days still have limited daylight. So the trick is going to be to figure out when's the best time to put plants in the ground so their roots will be nice and warm but not so early that photosynthesis lags behind and they grow spindly. Luckily most of the plants I want to grow have been bred to thrive in a variety of climates but I don't think any breeders thought seriously about how climate change was going to change how the plants need to behave in order to thrive.</p><p style="text-align: left;">There are seriously going to be so many crop failures because many agricultures are locked in stasis. Expect rice to get expensive because farms that have been expressly set up for rice are now outside of rice's climactic comfort zone, and the places that are now in those climate bands aren't anywhere near able to switch from the crops the used to grow there a decade ago to rice. Agile Farming is going to become a buzzword soon, mark my words.</p><p style="text-align: left;">I'm betting that I'll change my most successful crop varieties every few years here, and so preserving and keeping everything is going to be a thing if people want to enjoy a famine-free life. </p><p style="text-align: left;"><b><span style="font-family: times;"></span></b></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;"><b>ODD THOUGHT OF THE DAY: </b><br />What if all those ancient calendars were the shamans and priests of their eras' way of trying to figure out why the crops they'd been recommending to plant "<i>on the full moon of the Coronation</i>" didn't work so good any more, i.e. just frantic attempts to keep themselves looking infallible while changing climate patterns just overwhelmed and overthrew them? </span></blockquote><p></p><div><p></p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Mistakes Were Made: </h3><div><p style="text-align: left;"></p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I allowed the plants to be planted by a gardener and so they ended up in the wrong locations. </li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I also relied on garden-centre/Bunnings-type seedlings and they still start them way too late for today's climate so they're behind the 8-ball from the get-go.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I didn't plan well enough for layout or anything and so I've mucked up a lot of opportunities this year. </li></ul><p></p><p style="text-align: left;">One of the biggest oversights was to not really <i style="font-weight: bold;">really</i> take account of the changing climate pattern. I've known it's happening for decades but I still have trouble shaking off the old "<i>conventional wisdom</i>" fallacy. It's a blind spot I share with almost everyone in agriculture: "<i>Welp, this is how it was grampa's day and dad's day and while I was kid - except for that drought of '73 of course. Oh and the drought of '84, and that one in '95...</i>" - and it's a blindside we all seem somehow still stuck with, just like those shamans and priests when they couldn't just go with what their senses were telling them. </p><p style="text-align: left;">(<i>And yes I will fight people on this - neolithic people that did farm, didn't just all know exactly when to put in a crop or how. Look at us today: Once upon a time in my life I could do lightning long maths in my head. Now, I can still do it if I can be bothered when there are calculators and sites that calculated out formulas for you instantly. When I want to know the recipe for khushari I grab my phone. In the same way, those hominids would let their shaman tell them when the right time was, how deep to plant, etc. Yes there were always some exceptional ones but we are and always have been economical with our brains.</i>)</p><p style="text-align: left;">Another one was that I felt too unwell to go and site the plants myself, if I had, there'd have been a bit less competition for sunlight. The paste tomatoes were too close to and behind the salad toms (<i>and partly this is because my beds aren't really deep or wide so space is at a premium and needs to be carefully managed</i>) and the chillis also ended up behind the cherry (<i>salad</i>) tomato plant.</p><p style="text-align: left;">Feeling unwell meant that I didn't get the beds overwintered properly and so there wasn't much cover to begin with, and that meant that I couldn't get in some plants that I really wanted there to shelter the new season's summer crops.</p><p style="text-align: left;">And because of that lack of cover I had to keep the cat screens in place for way too long, and they got grown into by the plants, which restricted my access for pruning back and shaping. And that's played merry hell with my ability to harvest - and weed. It also contributed a lot to the runaway successful ability of one plant to overgrow and outcompete everything else. But I can't predict illness and so I guess the best I could do is what ended up happening.</p><p style="text-align: left;">This year is going to start around the time I started on the <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2022/10/why-have-i-been-quiet.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Not So</a> <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2022/10/why-have-i-been-quiet-pt-2.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bastard</a> <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2022/11/why-have-i-been-quiet-pt-3.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gate</a> last year, i.e. around October/November but this year it'll be with warm sunny spots for seedling raising. Luckily I think I'll have a perfect spot - if the landlord's plans for the driveway don't muck it all up... If not, then I'm going to be kind of stonkered. (<i>"<a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stonkered" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Stonkered</a>", in the sense of 2nd meaning, i.e. "foiled." Time to bring back some <a href="http://worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-sto3.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">old expressions</a>, I say!</i>)</p><p style="text-align: left;">If the driveway spot becomes unavailable then I have two more choices, one behind the NSBG and one which is currently not available but would become so if landlords' Plan A goes into effect.</p><p></p></div><h2 style="text-align: left;">Team Ted Goals:</h2><p style="text-align: left;"></p><p style="text-align: left;"></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Next year I need to plant out most seedlings about a month earlier. Given this was mostly December, that means way more work will need to start in November this year.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>In order to have seedlings to plant out, I'll need to start a lot of them in September and then thin them out to the best of the lot. </li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>That means working out a sun-warm sheltered spot for the plants (<i>see a few paragraphs back</i>) and that's not going to be easy but I'll put my thinking cap on soon. If things here work out to plan I may have the perfect spot.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>When planting out, tomatoes will have to go at the back of the beds on the east side, front of the beds on the south side. The SE side is going to be tough to call.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I don't think I'll bother with chillies next year because they were fine but they were a rescue, I'll now have enough there to supply us for a few years, and besides sriracha and so forth are cheap to buy.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Much more basil will need to go in among the tomato rows and parsley too behind/under/among. Any spring peas or beans will need to be catty-corner to the tomatoes and have a wire trellis to keep them to themselves. </li></ul><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I also have plans for gherkin cucumbers and eggplant and that may make 2024 a bumper year for a 5.5m x 80cm total of garden beds. </li></ul><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Training tomato plants to an almost espalier pattern and really training peas and beans to their trellises might be a good thing too. </li></ul><p></p>Also, by next year I'll actually have the reticulation system working all the way around and dialled in for the plants. Programming is getting harder as my brain slows - it takes me weeks to get into "The Zone" where I retain the flow of a program and how to integrate a circuit with that code and then how to integrate that product into its real life environment, and every time I had a good Zone going, something came along to blow it up. Hope for better focus this winter.<p></p><p style="text-align: left;">Money: I had a survey company I worked with which paid around $20/mth to buy parts, and they did the dirty and ditched on us and reformed as another company which would now only pay me $5 for the same amount of work if I'm lucky, and that makes it just no longer worth the long hours I was putting in. So now I have no way to buy thing other than saving a few bucks from my pension here and there, and most of those bucks pay for web hosting, domain names, and minor fees, with now nothing left in the tank for the retic design nor any recycling gear. (<i>Which will end up on Instructables and on my blog suite as a free design, just not as soon as I could have done them before...</i>)</p><p style="text-align: center;">So a quick tap on <a href="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Paypal</a>, <a href="https://ko-fi.com/ptec3d" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Ko-Fi</a>, or <a href="https://liberapay.com/PTEC3D/donate" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Liberapay</a> would always be appreciated.</p><p style="text-align: left;">I have my excuses - in the form of several surgeries, copious amounts of winter SADS because we've had a really stressful two and a half years what with new landlords, moving garden plots to allow them to split the block, having to somehow move six out of almost a dozen garden beds in the process, putting up with fences going up and a house being moved into the new division, demolition and new building going on across the road, half a dozen plan changes by the landlords that each required (<i>as Deadpool would say</i>) maximum effort in each case to just retain the things we had in place, and illnesses of various sorts and durations and caring for one another at times. </p><blockquote><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;">Currently the "<i>malaise du jour</i>" is Influenza A, something I've had before - almost thirty years ago - and even back then it knocked my on my ass for five weeks. This time, my lovely wife has it also, and she is finding it much harder going than I am so I'm the <i>de facto</i> nurse. But enough for you to know that the drainer full of tomatoes at the top of this article cost me about 20 minutes afterwards of trying to stop sweating and feeling like I'd just had a steamroller run over me. Wife's pulled a few muscles just from coughing and is laid up with heat packs and hot lemon drinks and analgesics, getting old really sucks. </span></p></blockquote><h2 style="text-align: left;">For The Moment:</h2><p style="text-align: left;">Before the weather turns wintery I'll have to put in broad beans, some other beans and peas, onions, garlic. I'll have to top up soil in some garden beds due to pulling up root balls and "cat activity." </p><p style="text-align: left;">I have time to work out a trellis system for vining plants, and (<i>as mentioned before</i>) need to set up a spot for early seedling raising. Being a very humid coastal region I think conventional portable greenhouses are going to be a problem so I'll try and work on a 12V / 24V heated insulated platform, a fan, and some clear plastic to make the magic happen, and lots of small nursery pots. There's my next project for a rainy day - and luckily, from now on we'll have a lot of those. </p><p style="text-align: left;">I'm also refining my systems for protecting plantings from the ravages of our felines, and our felines from my necessary use of at least some snail pellets. Snails have also been loving the warmer and wetter overall climate, and much as I hate chemicals, the beer traps didn't work as well and couldn't keep up, and most other "remedies" are actually "bullshit" and don't work. </p><p style="text-align: left;">I'll start a calendar where I can start placing observations, experiments, and results. I'll look for a shareable calendar and link it from here. For now, this blog post is my memo to myself more than anything else, and I hope you too get something out of it.</p></div>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-58982333248400684552023-03-31T20:04:00.003+08:002023-03-31T20:04:25.327+08:00Seed Viability, Testing, Using.<h4 style="text-align: left;">In which we look at testing common 'dried beans and pulses' to see if we can perhaps plant and grow them. <i><u>Spoiler Alert:</u></i> That description 'dried beans and pulses' literally describes the concept of 'seeds'. </h4><p>I still haven't gotten around to the pictures yet, but here goes the basic principle: </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">How To Test For Viability</h2><p>I've done this more times than some people have had hot homecooked meals and I'm sooo kicking myself for not doing anything about taking pictures. But my broad beans are due to go in soon so perhaps I'll run a viability test and take pictures. </p><p>The basic idea that I've tried on all my dried pulses etc all go a bit like this:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>I get hold of the disposable trays that meat, cakes, and some vegetables come on and clean them while doing my dishes. You can use any small flat tray with a depth of 1cm or a bit more as long as it's non-toxic. </li><li>I get hold of a roll of paper towel. This is pretty much THE medium to use, facial tissues are sometimes treated with aromatics or chemicals and so might spoil results. </li><li>I pick out some of the seeds (dried beans, lentils, etc) and set up a tray apiece for them. I number the trays with a texta somewhere visible outside.</li><li>To prepare a tray, I put a few millimetres of water in the bottom of the tray, then fold paper towels to a size that pretty much precisely fits in the bottom, stopping when I've put about ten layers down. </li><li>Now place ten or twenty of your test subjects in neat rows on the folded paper towel, and fold up another four layers of paper towel and place on top of the seeds and (hopefully) soggy bottom paper. Make sure the top layer is just damp, not too drowned.</li><li>Write down in your notebook the origin and type of the subject seeds, the tray number, and then put in a cool dark place. </li><li>Every few days, check in on your experiments and make sure they haven't dried out, drizzle a bit of water on if they're too dry, and watch for bulges that might indicate that seeds are sprouting.</li><li>When it's obvious many seeds have sprouted, give it a few more days for late sprouters, and then: </li><li>Carefully lift the top paper off and count how many seeds have sprouted and how many haven't. This gives you the viability percentage of the seeds and now you know how many seeds to plant if you want a minimum of a certain number of plants. Write that down in the notebook so you'll know for next time.</li></ul>If you're desperate for seeds, you <i style="font-weight: bold;">may</i> be able to cut the paper towel and plant the squares containing viable sprouts but generally I just plant new seeds at the right time. But doing this I've planted mung beans, poona peas (aka field beans), kidney beans, white beans, soya beans, chickpeas, and a few more. <p></p><h3 style="text-align: left;">A Cool Money-Saving Note:</h3><p>I also have some food-grade plastic containers with loose fitting lids and I often throw in a double layer of mung beans or poona peas and so forth, cover them to almost double that depth with water, and leave them in a cool place for a week or two. The seeds sprout and make a great addition to sandwiches, salads, stir fries, and other cooking. A bag of mung beans costs a few bucks and if you cook them up you can get perhaps half a dozen meals from them. If you sprout them, you easily triple that or more. And you'd pay top dollar for a tray of sprouts at the supermarket, whereas that bag of beans was relatively cheap. </p><p>Also, some things like poona peas, mung beans, and radishes make a great green manure for your soil - plant them by the handful, allow then to get 30cm tall, and spade-dig them back into the soil.</p><p>Now for some notes about the seeds your supermarket sells as drygoods.</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Drygoods Or Seed Stock?</h2><p>Almost all those dried goods are seeds. Red beans, red kidney beans, great northern beans, white beans, broad beans, chickpeas, mung beans, and some lentils and seeds are just dried naturally. This is how beans grow in nature - the pods and beans dry on the plant, then the pods split from drying out and seeds fall out, and hopefully some will get a purchase in the soil and a new plant or twenty will come up. Things like wheat are sometimes viable but also many times they've been blasted clean and may not be viable at all. </p><p>Birdseed is often a good source of viable seed. Out of a kilo bag of sunflower seeds for parrots I was able to grow a decent patch of black sunflowers. Seeds of those sunflowers were okay to eat, but the whole plants from roots to heads were also a great feed for the poultry and by rationing them out they supplemented the chicken feed for the rest of the year. Bunnies and goats would also enjoy the plants and even a few seeds here and there as a treat. So don't overlook stuff like that. </p><p>Some online seed catalogues sell things like alfa-alfa seeds in bulk, and they make great salad sprouts or fully grown feed for the herbivores. Your local seed libraries often have seeds. And all of these can be tested for viability as outlined above and grown. </p><p>Things like radishes also grow well from seed, and if you let a few plants go rather than digging them up, you can let their pods dry, then save the seeds for the next crop. Rocket lettuce will surprise you by growing to a metre tall and setting pods full of seeds too - and yes they're viable and easy to grow for greens, micro-greens, and more seed. Carrots are an exception, they seed on a two year cycle, so you should leave them in the ground or over-winter them somewhere they won't get frosts, and let them go the second year and collect the seeds once the plant dies back. </p><p>Potatoes themselves are all you need to grow more potatoes, and to be honest, they're even a pest in my garden, no matter how carefully I dig the beds over and remove all the little Kipfler spuds, they come back year after year and if I'm honest I'm actually quite happy to have them in the kitchen. </p><p>Silver beet and rainbow chards will really eagerly go to seed if you let them, and if you just let them have their way they'll grow absolute jungles of new plants every year so you can then cut back the old ones and let the cycle repeat with the young ones. And as with so many of these plants, the poultry and herbivores (if you keep any) will enjoy the trimmings, cuttings, and spare seed heads. </p><p>Once I have beans or peas planted and growing happily, I'll mark out one plant or one vine for seed, and not pick the pods of that marked section. I sometimes loosely wrap a piece of wool around that vine section so I can tell it apart from the rest. I then just let those vines stay in the garden until they're dried and the pods are dry - now I have seed for next year. </p><p>E.g. I started with about 15 broad bean seeds from a store-bought packet seven years ago, and we've had beans enough for a dozen meals that I cooked directly from each planting since then, or that I blanched and froze, or kept as dried beans by picking them before they started to dry off, podded, and let dry in a hanging dehydrating tent then stored. I could also have placed them in a dehydrator and done the same. </p><p>And I also ended up with around a hundred or so beans for seed that first year, which I swapped with others and kept a few to plant the next crop and the next, keeping about forty seed beans. At this stage they've actually gone for five generations in those seven years and I'm only just now going to buy a new pack and plant them just to revitalise the line. </p><p>But I could as easily have kept on keeping seed and mixing generations to keep the gene pool mixing a bit. After all, these big boi seeds can stay viable for quite a few years. </p><p>A seed box can be something like a couple of shoeboxes, with seeds in folded-up paper towel envelopes marked with the seed and year. Once you've raided the pantry drygoods and the local garden clubs and seed libraries, you can keep planting year after year, saving new seeds every year. Just keep the box in the coolest and driest place in the house and keep the newest seeds and sow the oldest ones and you'll be golden. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Ornamentals</h3><p>To me, there's nothing as beautiful and ornamenting as a good healthy crop of edibles and herbs and fruit - but there are also people (<i>my beloved among them</i>) to whom the aesthetics of a garden are also important. Flowering plants also have seeds that can be saved in many cases, and they can be saved the same way, traded with other people for other varieties, and replanted. They're just beyond the limited scope of my article here, and I may find a few sources online and update this document here with those resources.</p><h1 style="text-align: left;">One More Thing</h1><div>Please <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2023/03/the-call-to-action.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">go to this page</a> on my other blog and take the time to read it. I'm trying to make the world a better place again, a place where you can grow save and plant and not have to worry if the water and soil are safe for you to grow in, if the climate this year means you need to plant earlier or harvest earlier or if that plant will even grow in the heat this year, and - more importantly - if the children today will inherit a world where they too can enjoy gardening, seed saving, and seed procurement from unusual sources. I really urge you to go, take a look, and decide if you want to become a part of that movement.</div>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-31386325353266554102023-03-11T11:56:00.000+08:002023-03-11T11:56:12.195+08:00Soil Transfusion, Stat!<h4 style="text-align: left;">Follow that with 180sqm of cover crop, green manure, and worms! </h4><p>Fertilisers have a bigger environmental footprint than the shipping industry. And aviation. Combined. The toll from overuse of fertilisers on the environment is - catastrophic, for many ecosystems. Worse still, this isn't even for the food. Because most farmers also over-produce as well as over-fertilising. And aside from the waste of ploughing unsold produce back in, there's wastage all along the chain, from warehouses, supermarkets, and finally in the home. </p><p>"<span style="font-family: times;"><i>According to a report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the average American family of four throws away between $1,350 and $2,275 worth of food each year. This amounts to between 25% and 40% of all food purchased. The report also states that up to 40% of all food produced in the United States goes uneaten, which equates to approximately $218 billion worth of food each year. This waste not only impacts the family's budget but also has significant environmental consequences, as discarded food contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and the depletion of natural resources.</i></span>" -- ChatGPT search. </p><p>Adding all the wastage together, it seems that around half of all food produced never finds a use in First World countries. Half the fertiliser being used could have been spared if we'd only used all of that food. (<i>More down in the <a href="#footnote">footnote.</a></i>) </p><p>So it's good that <a href="https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2023/02/want-to-jumpstart-habitat-restoration-try-a-soil-transplant" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">they're talking about how adding a field's worth</a> of healthy soil to the top of your soil will bring back the nutritional value, the richness, the water-holding capacity, of your garden / farm / homestead. It means farmers can use less fertilisers and cause less environmental disaster. And here's my story of having done this - on a tiny, home garden (<i>and once, for a while, a homestead garden</i>) scale and not realising how people might not have known how to do this. In fact, to me, with a father who was an Agricultural Engineer among his many qualifications, the idea that "<i>you don't grow vegetables, you actually grow soil</i>" was self-evident.</p><p>This article sets out stuff I've done to not have to use fertilisers, soil wetting and moisture holding factory products, and most pesticides.</p><p><b><u><span style="font-family: times;"></span></u></b></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;"><b><u>Disclaimer:</u></b><i> The techniques I detail here are things I've done to correct home garden plots and beds, a homestead garden, and covered a range of soils and hot to cool temperate climate zones. The materials I've used aren't available everywhere. So don't take this as concrete instructions, rather as a starting point for your particular environment. </i></span></blockquote><i></i><p></p><p></p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Start Here For Home Garden Remediation</h3><p>Read the article up there at the beginning of this post first, though. A small amount of soil with the right organic components, plants, bacteria, and insects in it, <i style="font-weight: bold;">will</i> spread out into other soil if you let it. I've been doing this at home for years. I did it back in WA when I wanted to grow stuff in what had basically been beach sand and needed a way to improve the soil's nutritional value and water-holding, and compost got turned into solar-sterilised dust by the heat. </p><p>Western Australia (<i>around the capital, Perth, at any rate</i>) is literally beach sand all the way back to the foothills and all the way down down down to some insane depth, pretty much to the aquifer it sits on. Buildings need L-O-O-O-O-N-N-G (<i>and really specialised</i>) pilings driven halfway to Timbuktu in order to stay upright. And water just seeps down through that sand right to the aquifer instead of staying up there and doing useful work like watering plants. </p><p>Where I was, I was still over that aquifer, same sandy soil, same heat, just a few miles south. If you watered in the early hours of pre-dawn, then by midday your plants were wilting from lack of water, if you then watered with the drip irrigation again, then by evening everything was wilting again, but it - barely - kept things alive.</p><p>Veges need a reliable source of water, and this wasn't it. Placing mulch on top of the bed kept the sand cooler, but the water still drained away within 2-3 hours, leaving the plants, bacteria, and fungi parched. People around there spend insane amounts on animal manure and soil from less crazy geological regions, and I think Perth probably also provides half of the annual profits of the whole soil wetter / moisture retainer industries. I always tried to be a bit more mindful of the environmental effects of all those chemicals and used things like straw, coconut coir and peat moss, but I'd just moved down the extra few miles south and was also on the bones of my backside due to having to go on disability pension so I needed to do things the cheaper but harder way. </p><p>By making a small area of the garden into my "soil farm" I was able to make something a bit richer and more organic than that Sahara-like sand, and actually had my vegetables - in those (<i>previously</i>) sandy beds - growing nicely by the end of that year. I found things like lawn clippings (<i>not great, but beggars can't be choosers</i>) and fallen dry leaves from around the native trees and scrub, I put the poo from my little herd of bunnies in the soil I was building, any vegetable scraps from my kitchen, and (<i>I am not even kidding when I say this</i>) if I travelled back to the foothills for any reason, I took a folding spade and a few empty feed bags with me and - with a wary eye open for official ranger types - would shovel a bag or two of real soil and take it home for that soil fixing patch.</p><p>Getting all that organic material in allowed the "soil farm" to thrive and create more live soil. I had a comfrey seedling I stuck in because I'd read that they're good for compost, so I let that and a handful of Poona peas grow on for two months and then just spaded them right back in along with the mulch, then shovelled it onto my garden, added more mulch. and planted my vegetables in. They thrived and I started to eat better. . .</p><hr /><h3 style="text-align: left;">What Sort Of Soil Needs Repair / Amending?</h3><p>Well, the above case was one such - in that case though, I wasn't so much rebuilding it, as building a new type of soil, one that wasn't in the ecosystem of the region before. I felt that that was okay as long since I wasn't creating tens of thousands of acres of it. (<i>That's how commercial farming has destroyed so many ecosystems.</i>) But I figured that my 5sqm of garden would just sink into that sand after I left and there'd been a few decent downpours.</p><p>But another case - and the one I'll discuss in the remainder of the article - is my recent situation of having had to take down eight assorted established raised beds and move as many as would fit to a new part of the property (<i>six, as it would turn out</i>) - and so I was left with a pile of dirt that was disturbed, turned upside down, and getting baked by the sun while things slowly happened. First there had to be the new fence around the front yard, the slow moving of garden beds (<i>old, mobility issues, prone to falling asleep and yelling at kids to get off my damn lawn, etc</i>) and building them in so they weren't now an eyesore, etc.</p><p>You couldn't dig your fingers into that pile of soil after a few months as it was just put in a pile and left until I had time to deal with it, which turned out to be a bit too late. It had baked into a big adobe block by then, also it had had to be located out of the way of construction equipment which meant it was out of the prevailing rains but in the full sun, which pretty much killed it.</p><p>Fertile healthy soil has plants growing in it, plenty of organic material rotting and supplying nutritients, plenty of active insects, worms, microbes, and fungii. It generally has a topping of something to protect the top layer from the sun. It's crumbly / sticky and holds water well, and if you dig up a big clump and break it open you can see the bugs and worms, smell the earthy-mushroomy aroma of it. </p><p>The kind of soil that needs amending is what I finished up with after half a year's lying around in the hot sun after having been dug out of the raised beds and piled up without a covering crop to keep it shaded and holding water and alive. </p><p>(<i>That can also happen when commercial farms run relentless schedules of crops, ploughing the ground right over in between, and depending on fertilisers to raise yields, and pesticides to remove competing plants and fungus/insect species. Under these conditions the natural biome in the soil dies off and is replaced by a very unbalanced, smaller, and degraded group of soil organisms that are unable to manufacture enough nutrients to make the soil crop nutrient-dense. There'll be a larger crop but overall it'll have less nutritional value.</i>) </p><p>Before the relentless pressure to produce more and more crop for lower and lower prices, farmers had a brief glorious window where they knew that they weren't growing crops and raising animals - they were growing healthy soil, and it was that soil that grew their crops and fed their animals. But an increasing population and demand for more and more, changed all that. That older type of farmer didn't continue farming for long in that economic environment, and the soil and its ecosystem died as those farmers departed.</p><p></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;">And it occurs to me that farmers today could possibly outsource their soil stewardship to a soil farmer. If such a soil farmer existed . . . (<i>And<b> </b></i><i>I'll make a </i><i>separate post about that soon and put the link to it here.</i>)</span></blockquote><p></p><p>Anyway - back to the nitty-gritty. As I mentioned, I still had a little bit of fertile healthy dirt from the one lone bed I'd kept going until the last possible moment, plus some coconut coir peat and a bag of "poona peas" (<i>aka field beans</i>) to throw in. I worked with enough of the 'dead' dirt to fill the bottom half of an old IBC (<i>1000litre/240gal 'tote' tank</i>) partway up (<i>I went to about halfway up that lower 1/4 of the IBC that I was using, i.e. about 0.125 of a cubic metre,</i>) topped it with some of the healthy soil, whatever amendments I had to hand, and the green manure crop of Poona peas.</p><p></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjewSqf3pCvkVjakApdBHOi189Qdfg56N13PFJuzyE_g1EPVYS8m-vf_CwEmAxA0zsk7pkXTJaVoPt1L3AtGuJs3fKz6vaYF27uotkZi-h0j5kPfFo1qZsx-aFrnFtMJhxc8tOhV4EadkM8sjZJDtDt6sZy2Syp38-r2aGaq9miz3dIc-sEc9M/s1024/IBC010102.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="707" data-original-width="1024" height="221" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjewSqf3pCvkVjakApdBHOi189Qdfg56N13PFJuzyE_g1EPVYS8m-vf_CwEmAxA0zsk7pkXTJaVoPt1L3AtGuJs3fKz6vaYF27uotkZi-h0j5kPfFo1qZsx-aFrnFtMJhxc8tOhV4EadkM8sjZJDtDt6sZy2Syp38-r2aGaq9miz3dIc-sEc9M/s320/IBC010102.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>I cut my damaged IBC similar to this.<br />But without the cage.</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="text-align: left;">I had an IBC (<i>100litre/240gal tote tank</i>) like the above and the top half of it was damaged by the sun, cracked and crazed, while the very bottom - which had been shaded by plants and some stored building material - was still semi okay. As I'm a miserly bast*rd I'd already cut that bottom section down to much the same as the picture above and was using it to hold firewood. When we were due to move everything out of the newly-divided section of the yard, it was supposed to go to the tip, but then I had my miserly brainwave. </p><p style="text-align: left;">I set it up on the driveway - a less than ideal situation because it was in full sun for 3/4 of the day - but I also had some pallets and needed a place for those, so I arranged them so that they cast partial shade over the chunk of IBC - and started moving baked soil in, then some of the good soil from the last raised bed, and then started making amendments... I was wringing the last few years of life out of a piece of plastic I'd almost thrown away. And the fact that the outlet tap was in this half meant I could open it and so let the water out so that the soil wouldn't turn into a pocket swamp. Win-win-win.</p><p style="text-align: left;">By this stage I was also able to cart the rest of the impoverished soil back into the raised beds in their new location, and divide up the remainder of the better soil from the last operating raised bed among them. I planted them out and we started getting small quick crops - lettuces, rocket, silverbeet, a few herbs, not cropping fantastically but at least producing some food and some biological activity in the beds and (<i>I hoped</i>) starting some recovery in the soil.</p><p style="text-align: left;">The beds I wasn't growing stuff in either remained open for the cats to avail themselves of, or I grew cover / green manure crops in them . A few months later I used some of the soil I'd been "brewing" in the IBC to top them with and since then the beds haven't looked back. Whenever we've had to re-pot any of the ornamentals or the few food plants I have growing in pots, we're taken the spent soil back to the soil growing bed, first taking out enough to refill the pots with. </p><p style="text-align: left;">And I keep finding amendments to keep the soil growing bed active, which means the nutrients we lose when we eat the vegetables and then regretfully flush <i style="font-weight: bold;">our</i> manure away, and the bit of dirt that gets washed away from the roots of the consumed plants, get replaced.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Things To Amend Your Soil With:</h3><p style="text-align: left;">A totally not crazy suggestion is - find some soils around your region that haven't been tainted or degraded and which seem to have a thriving biome and plenty of life. If you can legally take a few bags of this, use it as your starting soil, feed it up with amendments and once it's thriving use it to repair some less fortunate soil so that your chosen new biome can take over the lot. Take a good look around your area - what sorts of ecosystems are there? What feeds each ecosystem's soil? Your garden is usually a foreigner to the region, perhaps you can find some unique stuff in the vicinity to feed back into your soil and make your gardens chime with the local ecosystem.</p><p style="text-align: left;">Ideally you should have mostly those sorts of local amendments because it'll attract the local ecosystem to your garden and so you'll get natural pest controllers, natural fertilisers, and also be doing something to retain the local ecosystem. Which local critters 'fertilise' the soils here? Can you get an occasional few scoops of wombat poo or rabbit droppings or the leaf litters from around a dozen native tree species? These are important. They make the locale what it is. It's probably easier to fit in than to try to overwhelm with fertilisers and pesticides - after all, that's what large scale farms did to their locales, and look at how dependent they now are on the chemical industry. . .</p><p style="text-align: left;">What else you can use are plants like comfrey, borage, and yarrow because they all grow quickly, and can then just be dug in. (<i>if you catch them before they start to flower. And if they do happen to go to seed, let them finish, collect the seeds, and you'll have seeds to start new green manures for your garden beds. And you'll still be able to shred the mature plants - without the seeds - and use them to improve soil.</i>) </p><p style="text-align: left;">The reason I had for using these particular ones is that these are some nice soft plants that'll rot fairly cleanly without creating too many decomposition byproducts, and comfrey is allegedly a great compost 'activator' and therefore works just as well activating your soil as it would compost. If only I'd had some comfrey this time. . . Still, with the range of other stuff I had at my disposal the soil building up worked well enough for me to reactivate six beds and dozens and dozens of pot plants and meanwhile all the spent soil in the soil building IBC is already raring to be put to use. I may just spread some over the lawns</p><p style="text-align: left;">I didn't have those mostly due to our sudden space constraints, but I could, and did, plant Poona peas (<i>which are also known as field beans</i>) and which you can buy by the bagful in Indian groceries and nowadays in supermarkets too because it's an important ingredient in many cuisines and recipes.</p><p style="text-align: left;">You could also buy mung beans the same way, they're perfectly fine to grow because they're also just harvested at the dry pod stage, winnowed, and bagged. If they're adulterated by chemicals to sterilise them they they can't be sold as food, so they're perfectly viable as seed. And they're tiny so they sprout really quickly... </p><p style="text-align: left;">(<i>Also worth noting is that pretty much all dry beans have to be in the same pure state, so kidney beans, fava beans, garbanzo beans - aka chickpeas - and so forth. Lentils I'm not so sure of as I've never gotten them to sprout for me, but it's worth taking a dozen each of the dried pulses you have in the pantry and viability testing them. <b>I'll put a smaller sub-article up about this in a week or so.</b> And yes, I've even grown my own chickpeas with some small success from a bag of supermarket garbanzos. I'll mention those in that future article, too, and why I considered them a failure.</i>)</p><p style="text-align: left;">The main thing with green manures is to let them get some growth - but stop before they get too far along. And by "stop" I mean just chop them with a spade and dig them into the soil. If they accidentally get to the stage of setting seed, don't panic, let them go and collect all the seeds so you won't have to buy any more for future cover/manure crops, and then use the stalks and leaves by digging them into the soil once the seeds have been collected. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Other things to use are animal manures but even there, there are <b><u>caveats:</u></b> 'forever herbicides' that can be used on feed crops to turn them into dry hay sooner creates a feed tainted with a long-lasting herbicide. The feed (apparently) doesn't affect the animals but the chemical goes through them unchanged, the animals poop, the poop gets collected and sold as manure - and sometimes it's manure with concentrated forever herbicide in it. . . This tainted commercial manure has killed several allotment schemes, and affected hundreds around the world.</p><p><span style="font-family: times;"></span></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;">There have been several cases of herbicide contamination in fertilizers that have caused crop loss and soil contamination. Here are a few references to some of these incidents:</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">In 2020, a batch of fertilizers containing the herbicide aminopyralid caused crop damage and soil contamination in the UK. Farmers reported that the herbicide caused their crops to wilt and die, and that the contamination persisted in their soil for several years.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">Reference: "Aminopyralid in compost: How to avoid herbicide damage," Garden Organic, <a href="https://www.gardenorganic.org.uk/sites/www.gardenorganic.org.uk/files/resources/factsheets/FactSheet50.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.gardenorganic.org.uk/sites/www.gardenorganic.org.uk/files/resources/factsheets/FactSheet50.pdf</a></span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">In 2019, a batch of organic fertilizers containing the herbicide clopyralid caused crop loss and soil contamination in the US. Farmers reported that the herbicide caused their crops to become stunted and deformed, and that the contamination persisted in their soil for several years.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">Reference: "Herbicide Contamination in Manure, Compost, and Soil," Washington State University Extension, <a href="https://extension.wsu.edu/herbicide-contamination-in-manure-compost-and-soil/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://extension.wsu.edu/herbicide-contamination-in-manure-compost-and-soil/</a></span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">In 2018, a batch of fertilizers containing the herbicide glyphosate caused crop damage and soil contamination in Brazil. Farmers reported that the herbicide caused their crops to yellow and die, and that the contamination persisted in their soil for several years.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;">Reference: "Brazilian farmers say Bayer's Monsanto illegally pushed herbicide," Reuters, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSKCN1QH2GH" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSKCN1QH2GH</a></span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSKCN1QH2GH" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></span></p><p style="text-align: left;">Forewarned. Word.</p><p style="text-align: left;">You could also add comfrey, borage, and a whole host of other cheap seeds. If you have the space you could grow patches of field beans, comfrey, and borage etc and collect seeds for the next batch of soil rejuvenating green crops. If you can get some seaweed, wash it, chop it, dig that in. Coconut coir and fine mulch can be bought cheaply at garden centres and will decompose nicely in the soil and add structure and water capacity, and places for bacteria and fungi to collect. Shredded paper can also be added and does the same thing.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">So Now I Have Starter Soil</h3><p style="text-align: left;">I planted the beans fairly thickly, added a layer of coir on top, and also piled on pulled-up weeds and some grass clippings, and let it go for a few months before digging it over completely and then leaving it for another few months. There was a LOT more soil because of all the organic matter, dug-in cover crops, and stuff I added from various sources. </p><p style="text-align: left;">The climate here is pretty humid, which speeds up decomposition, in fact things here rotted four times as fast as they would have in WA. (<i>There, I got around this issue by making the soil building bed in the shade of a tree, and covering it with old cloth and rags that I kept damp by hosing it several times a day. That worked because I was able to stay home all day but a weeping hose or soaker hose could as easily be set on a timer to do this for you.</i>) </p><p style="text-align: left;">So it was that about five months over a rainy winter saw me with an almost full IBC section. As I'd moved the lucky six raised beds to their new locations along with their loads of degraded soil around the same time I'd started the IBC, and planted our first crops in them, I arranged my timing so that as each crop came off, I added a layer of the "reconditioned" soil from the IBC on top and lightly turned it in, then planted new cover / manure crops or new food crops, and almost immediately you could see the difference by how much better those things grew. As I skimmed off some soil from each bed I topped up, all of that went into the reconditioning IBC, along with the spent pot soil, more coir and fine wood mulch or whatever else I'd obtained, and turned in. </p><div><p>I'd been thinking of turning some food scraps into the IBC as well - but I also have <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2022/05/ive-got-worms-and-thats-good-thing.html" target="_blank">worm attractors in those new beds</a> and realised that as they could now move more easily in the new softer amended soil, the worms began eating up most of our vegetable scraps in the worm feeders and leaving more healthy soil in their wake. </p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsVlWvsDmXxco-GWbQads6iuTPRV41nhPM0wMWpFHRNYJMLzbBog1RfKAocdVjIAzXeR0Kh4GafIUirDUyTicrDIGGYE5yZb6vNoNeTT9ssIOt0dhd50td8bayCUKgTUTFinLNWK1WFRPIXlr99ehkA2wUYi4SrE_bLXkirGfnTTy4nmNuCyE/s4080/20220524_101541.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3060" data-original-width="4080" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsVlWvsDmXxco-GWbQads6iuTPRV41nhPM0wMWpFHRNYJMLzbBog1RfKAocdVjIAzXeR0Kh4GafIUirDUyTicrDIGGYE5yZb6vNoNeTT9ssIOt0dhd50td8bayCUKgTUTFinLNWK1WFRPIXlr99ehkA2wUYi4SrE_bLXkirGfnTTy4nmNuCyE/s320/20220524_101541.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>The white PVC pipe is a worm attractor - see <br />the link above, description below.</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="text-align: left;">That bed pictured has a mix of those cover crop / green manure plants and was taken just a few weeks before I dug them back in. The wire cage around is foldable at each corner, and the main purpose of it is to prevent the cats from digging up tender seedlings - I now have several beds with permanent well-established plants that no longer need the panels as the cats just 'go' in the undergrowth and their doings are quickly watered in and eaten by the worms.</p><p style="text-align: left;">The wire itself is available in rolls, is 50mm x50mm squares of a 2mm thick wire and colloquially known as "puppy wire" and is the heftier cousin of "flower wire." It's strong enough to be self-supporting, and I just cut three panels to size, plus leaving wire points sticking out along one edge of the shorter side panels<i> </i>to let me bend loops around the centre panel to make a foldable edge, which lets me fold them flat to get them out of the way when not needed, or open them and rest them against the fence at the back as pictured to let the cats know there are other beds that are easier to poop in. They'd also keep rabbits out if you have a rabbit problem.</p><p style="text-align: left;">The worm feeders are 100mm PVC pipe 500-600mm long and the bottom 300mm has 4mm holes for the worms to enter and leave, and these holes should all be buried below the soil. You can see that these holes also tie the raised bed's soil down through the weed mat to the rest of the yard's soil because the pipe sticks down a fair way below the garden soil. The cap on top is also available in the hardware store and I added a cheap plastic drawer handle to be able to open it. It's needed to keep the feeding area moist and dark, as worms much prefer such an enviromnment.</p><p style="text-align: left;">You should only open the lid as infrequently as possible and then only to add kitchen scraps and water to keep them damp. Worms hate several things - disturbances, noises, light, and dryness. Our beds are maybe ten metres away from a highway so they're used to vibrations and disturbance (<i>there's a fire truck passing as I write this, and a few minutes ago a passing B double rig made the house shake as it hauled construction materials from some point A to some other point B. Safe to say the worms here know no other environment.</i>) </p><p style="text-align: left;">In my case, I tend to open the lids once every four weeks to drop in prunings, kitchen scraps, and what-have-you from around the garden dividing it evenly between the five beds that have the worm feeders. Also (<i>not shown in the image above as that was an early picture</i>) I drilled a 5mm hole into the lid, fed in a piece of drip tube and put a slow dripper on the inside, and carried the other end of the tubing to the reticulation system so that when the reticulation comes on, the worm feeders get a slow steady drip of water, helping the worm feed to decompose and attracting worms to the bonanza of food and nice wet ground.</p><p style="text-align: left;">In my opinion nothing improves your soil like worms. They aerate the soil and form tunnels to allow water to circulate, their castings are perfect plant food. This is also why I have a 'bare minimum' reticulation system so that there'll always be enough moisture for the worms to hang around and to keep the plants alive but I still get to hand water every few days to check on the gardens. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Anyway. Back to the soil. The thing is that the amended soil I added and lightly dug in was apparently also attractive to the worms and helped bring them up. There are worms in the ground almost everywhere and they just need to be attracted. And so that thin layer of soil with new microbes worked in several ways - the microbes got washed down with watering, got carried along with worms that came up at night to check out the new food sources, and also got carried along with the cover crop seedling roots as they grew down. Then digging that first cover crop in turned more of it in deeper. Game set match.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">So yes</h3><p>I'm very sure that a small quantity of degraded soil can be parlayed into large amounts of good healthy soil quite quickly. You can literally "grow your own soil in the comfort of your yard or balcony." That's the thing that hit me, a few years back. People don't often consider this - that growing the <i style="font-weight: bold;">soil</i> is a more productive quest than farming food. </p><p>I never could get composting <i>per se</i>. I've always been lousy at making compost, but making soil better is far easier and it's also a bit more spectacular when showing it to people. </p><p>And the reason that this is so, I think, is the same reason why a larger aquaponics system is easier to manage than a small one - dilution. When I had my tiny aquaponics system (<i>I may whack up a post about that too, one day</i>) I found one thing - it was <i style="font-weight: bold;">hard</i> to get the water balanced right. I had only about 400 litres (<i>100 gallons I think?</i>) of water in the system in total. If a fish floated away to fishy heaven, its contribution was sure to be missed and plants would not grow as well.</p><p>If I added a smidgen too much food, the ammonia levels got horrible really fast. If the plants got too far ahead of the fish, they'd starve themselves. If plants died off or were harvested, fish would start to die because of the toxin buildup. Small changes made a huge difference to the whole system. Same with compost. Adding a tiny bit too much of something either killed the exothermic reaction, or pushed it to the point of setting fire to the compost.</p><p>There's one other benefit to making soil rather than compost - rodents. Putting kitchen scraps and fruit prunings and so forth into a compost drum meant so many rats chewing right through the 4mm thick plastic and partying hard in there. Do the same thing in a bigger plot of soil and the rats aren't quite as interested in having to do all that digging for a few scattered bits of pumpkin or carrot.</p><p>However. With all that being said. If you have access to good compost then by all means dig some of it into your soil. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Commercial Possibility?</h3><p style="text-align: left;">I think something like this needs to be done commercially. We need to <a href="https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2023/03/fertilizer-emissions-are-enormous-but-we-have-the-tools-to-cut-them-by-84/ " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">cut fertiliser use</a> but preferably without either destroying more of the biosphere of the planet nor at the expense of making food more expensive, nor at the cost of killing human populations with famine. Specialist soil amending companies could provide that alternative to fertilisers</p><p style="text-align: left;">We have to realise that one day soon, money will be a largely meaningless concept. The correct wealth we should be seeking is a regenerated ecosystem and a planet heading back from the brink of disaster. Anyone telling us that the disaster is "hyperbole" and "over-rated" needs to be firmly put down, because they are still of the money-first mindset which has caused all these over-consumptions.</p><p style="text-align: left;">Energy is becoming cheaper and cheaper and will be both economical and plentiful in only a very few more years, and at that time, recycling will become much more viable than digging up more raw materials, using machines to do work like recycling materials, reconditioning soils, tending agriculture (<i>which will need to be in buildings inside cities to allow land to return to more natural ways of farming</i>) and so forth. This is a post about your garden soil after all - but I also feel I need to ask you to start spreading this future vision. And I'll post my ideas about turning this into a commercial farm business in the next few weeks.</p><p style="text-align: left;">If anyone's interested in learning more about soil amendment, commercialising it, or climate/energy activism, <a href="https://mastodon.au/@ptec3d" rel="me noopener" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: inherit; color: #f01c05; font-size: 17px; outline: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease-in-out 0s, background-color 0.1s ease-in-out 0s;" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: inherit;">chat with me on Mastodon</span></a>. </p><h3 id="footnote" style="text-align: left;">Footnote:</h3></div>I'll take up that bit about food waste near the top of this article here. Read at your peril...<p>Adding all the wastage together, it seems that around half of all food produced never finds a use in First World countries. Half the fertiliser being used could have been spared if we'd only used all of that food. Or a population equal to half the population of the First World could have been saved from famine.</p><p>Also, the things we deem beneath us, the deformed fruit or vegetable, the turnips and beets that are easier to grow but we prefer to avoid, the organ meats, what we sneeringly call "offal" and feed to our pets - they all cost fertiliser when you come down to it. We waste more growing crops that we consider 'finer', throw away a third - no, a half - of the nutritional value of the animals we grew acres of feed crop to grow. </p><p>Needless to say, that's all a great waste. All the food purchased is only a percentage of all the food grown, then only three-quarters of that is used. If we presume that 75% of farmed food goes to market, that means that half that fertiliser burden went for nothing, as half the food didn't benefit anyone. This is such bad ju-ju that any way to at least cut back on fertiliser use would save half as much damage and pollution as just shutting down shipping and aviation, both of which we kind of need.</p><div><p>Also, because this seems to indicate that the average American family (<i>I presume we in Australia aren't far behind, and most First World countries, come to think of it</i>) only spends about $5,000 - $6,000 on food per year, that means that much of the average family's remaining food bill must be restaurant and takeaway foods. </p><p style="text-align: left;">My wife and I spend over $6,000 on groceries per year and we're just two - but we buy very little takeaway or any other meals that aren't made at home. By my estimation that means that a family of four should be spending at least that much on foodstuffs And if they're eating take-away and restaurant food then that's even worse because those are also wasteful but on a bigger scale...</p></div><p style="text-align: left;">So - a LOT of things need to change. Our habits are formed. But the next generation's are not. And almost all of our "hard-held opinions and habits" about our food are formed by education, advertising, and contemporary culture anyway so with more public knowledge, I reckon attitudes will change.</p><p style="text-align: left;">A few years ago, our attitudes to waste were that it's too hard to recycle, yet now we're finding out that mostly that 'knowledge' was actually propaganda by the companies producing the things that became waste because they found it more profitable to make waste our problem. Now there are people campaigning against that attitude, determined to make those corporations make good one way or another. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Our food and farming will similarly experience this renaissance of education, and hopefully very soon. In the meantime, you can help. Really.</p><p style="text-align: left;">If you'd like to hurry the change along, get activated, get active! As I'm fond of saying, keep the bastards honest. Write to politicians, CEOs, newspapers. Comment on articles online. Talk to your friends, family, and colleagues. Talk about it on social media. Share articles like this one. Post the link, email it. Hell, make a QR code of it and stick it to walls, windows, and lamp posts. </p><p style="text-align: left;">Also, help people like myself to do the research, take subscriptions on publications to research things, pay for the servers I rent online, the domain names I pay so people can find this content. It takes me a lot of time to make these posts, some more than others. This one was over twenty years in the making, some parts of it. You can always help by visiting <a href="https://ko-fi.com/ptec3d" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">my Ko-Fi page</a> and donating the price of a coffee. </p><p style="text-align: left;">And thank you for reading this. Now go and make noise!</p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-54898800408731249922023-03-07T22:35:00.003+08:002023-03-07T22:35:42.118+08:00The Last HEAT Of Summer. (Bottled.)<h4 style="text-align: left;">A cautionary tale. Also a tale of reward for giving much compassion to the rejected. Here beginneth a lesson for all who care for the runts of the litter, move the piglet from the hindmost tit to a front seat, and are prepared to become Stewards Of Their Domaynes.</h4><p>Okay Okay not so much. But the garden's been very giving this year. After having had to move six of our raised beds two years ago and reconditioning the soil over the space of a year, it's finally paying off. </p><p>Well, we did have good crops as well, but they were nothing compared to the production we're now getting. I'm very glad so many things have turned out so well despite a LOT of challenges. I'll have a post about soil amendment on a pauper's budget ready soon, for now this is a more amusing (<i>and surprising!</i>) development.</p><h2 style="text-align: left;">The Rise And Wrath Of <i>Capsicum Pubescens</i></h2><p>I was going to post a video where a mad geek makes a chainsword out of a chainsaw and an electric power motor and then has at a ballistic gel zombie skull but it was a bit gruesome. <br /><br />So here's a picture of a chilli I all unsuspectingly grew from one of a pair of neglected reject seedlings that I nursed through a whole winter in pots and then planted out earlier. This one is a Rocoto and I should have sussed when I cut its sibling open to find BLACK seeds inside.</p><p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAxNr5hAVTUIi-xP3-6GicA9xMbqJ_Ci-LUj93HTNOi6F5utdPzBTP566dgB9mX1mV8QGo-xs27fVnYJh4AZ0wulVA9CNEhKkiNdBRAebhXDJVh1i2yKYx55hFHdnuxnYT6QYnA69bIfo2lYXxsLs7QHsW6Vw1jRWka72ZSpUUm9qF0_ROaqA/s4080/20230306_165732.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="4080" data-original-width="2296" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAxNr5hAVTUIi-xP3-6GicA9xMbqJ_Ci-LUj93HTNOi6F5utdPzBTP566dgB9mX1mV8QGo-xs27fVnYJh4AZ0wulVA9CNEhKkiNdBRAebhXDJVh1i2yKYx55hFHdnuxnYT6QYnA69bIfo2lYXxsLs7QHsW6Vw1jRWka72ZSpUUm9qF0_ROaqA/s320/20230306_165732.jpg" width="180" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>A real, live grenade...</i></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>Anyway, I was about to make us dinner so I sliced a sliver off it to test it first - I like to adjust meals to low-medium sort of levels - and then had this thought that maybe I was going to perish, right there in the kitchen, 7 metres away from my beloved in the other room, because I couldn't yell. <br /><br />I couldn't speak, I couldn't squeak, and <b><i>where the hell was this tsunami of saliva coming from and why was it frothing?</i></b> I grabbed the bottle of milk and managed to pour a glass, then pour that glass down my throat to - hopefully - cushion the shock to my system.<br /><br />Because in a reflex I'd swallowed the damn thing and was mapping its progress by the fireball, and <i>would someone please turn off the flood of spit now kthxbai</i>? Because now I knew how these chillis killed, you basically dehydrated yourself as you poured all that slobber out. <br /><br />After about an hour of (<i>okay, less than five minutes of, felt a lot longer</i>) this I got some feeling back in my face, some composure back, and regained the power of rational thought and so I casually sauntered out, sat down, and said to Kerry: "F<b>fa</b>d wa<b>ff</b> th<b>m</b>m <b>the</b>rouff F<b>Fh</b>illi" and I thought she looked at me a bit funny. What? I was speaking as well as I could under the circumstances.<br /><br />Then she told me my upper lip was red, and my eyes really bloodshot, and said "you didn't actually put that in our dinner did ya? Say you didn't!" Yep. Apparently I look like a minor demon when I get a good hit of the old Scovilles. <br /><br /></p><div style="text-align: left;"><blockquote>For those playing along at home, a Jalapeno comes in at between 1,000 and maaaybe up to 7,000 Scoville units, Rocotos start at 40,000 and according to the scale I was checking top out around 300,000 Scovies. I've had (and tolerated) 150k Scoville chillis and this was definitely hotter so Imma say it was a 200-250k Scoville sort of rating. </blockquote></div><br /><h3 style="text-align: left;">Interesting snippet:</h3>How do they measure Scoville units? They extract the capsacain from the chilli, mix it with sugar syrup, and keep diluting it until tasters can no longer discern the heat. So 1000 Scovilles is 1 part chilli juice to 1000 parts sugar syrup, and so on. <br /><br /><h3 style="text-align: left;">Supplementary reading:</h3><a class="x1fey0fg xmper1u x1edh9d7" href="https://pepperheadsforlife.com/the-scoville-scale/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pepperheadsforlife.com/the-scoville-scale/</a> the Scoville scale<br /><br />Enjoy!<br /><p style="text-align: left;">And yes, I am definitely keeping these and making a chilli sauce out of them! I have some Tabasco bottles and I reckon I can find a place for some orphan Scoville units in my future.</p><p></p><h2 style="text-align: left;">Endpiece:</h2><p>The whole "<i>gardening on a pauper's budget</i>" thing: When we moved in here we were promised a long-term lease. (<i>Back in the days before Form2 longterm leases.</i>) Before the aforementioned Form2 leases became available, our landlord had a domestic upheaval, and our house was part of the settlement. So we were up in the air for about a year. But we'd gone for broke moving in, spent money we didn't really have to make the backyard cat-proof, gazebo, garden shed, and a range of raised and in-ground garden beds made in various ways and filled with the best garden soil we could afford which was pretty crappy but I knew I could build it up.</p><p>So - six months setting it up and starting up, a year before Grant had his life-changing experiences, and then almost a year in limbo as the one-day-to-be new landlord checked it out and finally bought it. And immediately said we were good to stay on but they wanted to split the block in two. And yep ALL the things we'd done were in the part of the land the landlord wanted to split off, the part that we'd put all that money into...</p><p>To MMC's (<i>new landlord(s) names obfuscated for their privacy</i>) credit they immediately made us a (<i>much smaller</i>) front yard fenced so that I could easily make it cat-safe again. And he was okay with us putting as many raised beds as we wanted in the front. Basically that told us that we would be okay as long as we didn't set the house on fire or start selling the flashing off the roof. </p><p>But the soil (<i>we had to move the six little beds, just give up on the others and ditch them</i>) hadn't really had a chance to start becoming productive, and sitting around baking in the sun while we moved beds and made the front yard ready. </p><p>I've already made a <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2022/05/ive-got-worms-and-thats-good-thing.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">post about the start</a> of the new beds and a <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2023/01/another-project-joy.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">follow-up post</a> on my other blog where some of the - . . . *ahem* . . . <i>unique challenges we faced</i> . . . are laid out plus the next phase. Anyhow. The other post I've alluded to about soil amendment will end up here on this blog in a few weeks. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">The Result:</h3><p>In the first year of using the beds I was waiting for the worms to figure out there was tucker to be had in each bed (<i>you can see what that's about in the first post mentioned in the last paragraphs</i>) and meanwhile we had several crops out of the beds, rotating them between crops and cat litter boxes. </p><p>Because we have cats and now they suddenly had a tiny yard less than 10% of the old yard, we either had to have multiple indoor litter boxes or assign one bed in rotation to the cats (<i>and the worms doing their stuff</i>) at each crop change. </p><p>And as my soil amendments took effect, the crops tended to not die from water issues when it was hot, seeds germinated happily in winter under their blankets of organic matter, and what grew, grew much better. </p><p>Brag time: I bought two very neglected chilli plants on the sale pile somewhere, about a year ago. I nursed them, they were basically skinny starveling sticks for six months, then had a crisis once they grew a few extra leaves, then recovered, and finally our weeding person put them - and two tomato seedlings - into one garden bed. I added some Italian sweet basil and some other herbs (<i>I can't remember - some random seedlings from the collection...</i>) underneath and the cherry tomato took off and it seemed it was going to drown everything under it.</p><p>I pinched out and pinched out and pinched out but this thing was implacable and unstoppable. And it's repaid us with 6 kilos so far and an estimated 10 kilos more still ripening. Meanwhile, the roma tomato behind it has about the same weight on it in green tomatoes, and - as I found out - the runt of the two 'charity chillies' had several fruits on it that were steadily ripening so I picked the ripest two for dinner... The other plant has some form of short dark-green jalapenos growing.</p><p>And an eggplant in another bed is also very late fruiting/ripening... And the spinach and chard and silverbeet have all already bolted - twice... And the herbs have all had a good season. And potato greens are everywhere, I'm thinking there'll be quite a few kilos of Kipflers later on.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Are You Bragging? </h3><p>Well yeah! Of course, I think I've learned and developed some good ways to make productive gardens on a tight budget. But also - sharing. </p><p>Sharing how to get a garden going quickly and without huge expense or too much hard work. I like to share all these projects. I also like it if you share these and other of my posts - across all my blogs - with your friends. Because that gets me a few more readers, and that will - eventually, maybe, perhaps - actually earn me my first cheque from Google Ads. It just needs people reading, seeing the ads, and maybe clicking on an ad every now and then.</p><p>My other blogs deal with renewables, EVs, AI, recycling, and a whole fistful of other such issues.</p><p>If you're reading that and thinking "huh? What '<i>all my blogs</i>' are you talking about?' then can I suggest maybe checking out my <a href="https://ohaicorona.com/teds-news-stand" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">News Stand</a> where you can see a live feed that lists all my posts as they get uploaded so you'll see them and the blogs they're made on. Or you could <a href="https://www.subscribepage.com/tedamailxpress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">subscribe to my newsletter</a>. It comes out once a week only and means you don't even have to remember to check.</p><p>Lastly if you'd like to more directly help me (<i>with the cost of servers, subscriptions, domain names, and some of the bits I use up in producing the posts and making the projects</i>) then you could either donate directly <a href="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">through Paypal</a> or maybe support me on <a href="http://Ko-Fi.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Ko-Fi.com</a>.</p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-53606078776493097662023-02-21T16:17:00.001+08:002023-02-21T16:18:55.241+08:00Textual Soundbites<p>... we call those, "quotes."</p><p>"This could have been a toot, Greg!" should really become the quote of the Mastodon Era. We're progressing towards shorter and shorter communications, so we need to make those communications really information-dense. In a way, we're coming a full circle.</p><p>When it was hard to even convey a concept, we thought long and hard about hunter signs we left for others. (<i>Would a big smilodon scratched onto a boulder be enough? Maybe add a reclined hominid with one arm tor... No, that might seem like the beginning of a campfire tale, better just a picture of a big cat.</i>)</p><p>Then came millennia of slightly more relaxed times. We had a much better spoken language (<i>where this come from? Myself not know how this "language" come from. One minute we scream and point, next minute we say "OMG! A smilodon! Run!" Hmmm, and now me confused, WTF is "minute?" Language hard.</i>) and could just say "OMG! A smilodon! Run!" </p><p>Perhaps scratchings on rocks and ochre drawings got made smaller because we suddenly had more concepts to express, and became pictographic, logographic, ideographic, alphabetic. Some, like runes and hieroglyphs, could convey several layers of contextual meaning. </p><p>As urgency declined (<i>we had kraals, caves, stone and wood houses to give us some leisure to write something longer than "OMG! A Smilodon! Run!" and chisel that into the rock where some Old One had hastily scratched an almost-complete smilodon - wonder why they stopped so suddenly? Hmmm, an Ancient Mystery I guess.</i>) we got better at turning ideas and concepts into physically recordable language. </p><p>Also, now that we had that communication tool we had a way to use some of the new-found safe time and space we'd built around us. We could suddenly record anything. Diary stuff. Observations. Speculations. ("<i>Smilodon was big deal to Old Ones. We have spears and walls now, not so big problem now. Maybe one day will be a big, flying smilodon that breathe fire and not look like smilodon but maybe snake or crocodile? Better try to see what can be done to appease such powerful godlike thing. (Now again - wtf does this thing - God - come from into my thinking?) Anyway - now ME am dat hominid dat can appease this deity, so you pay me to make it stop.</i>"<i> OMG! Have me invent "money?"</i>)</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">That Was A Long Intro Ted.</h3><p>It was. </p><p>And it kind of had to be. Because that era led to an era where - eventually - people were able to record thoughts on clay and papyrus and vellum and hides, carved into stone and wood, then paper and ink, and now, as patterns of electrons in a matrix, dots on a screen. </p><p>In that latter period we began to progress because while painstaking and slow, written knowledge could be copied and disseminated for the first time rather than having to travel to wherever the original document / rock /whatever was housed.</p><p>The art of the quote would happened around this time too. If you wanted to impress your reader (<i>and if you were someone with the knowledge to read and write, you were in a tiny group and probably would only have one or two other readers. Unless your output was deemed important enough to be copied by scribes</i>) with your knowledge, it would never hurt to refer to another document and use that as part of your work. </p><p>Then we got Gutenberg and his famous press, and so knowledge that was once only available to the small number of people that had access to the original manuscript or who could afford to have a scribe take it out of circulation for a year while they copied it, had access to that knowledge. The bible became the most influential book of its time for a reason - it was all Gutenberg produced, it was why he made the press in the first place. Quite simply, it flooded the market, and proved that mass propaganda worked. </p><p>Once we moved to having many presses rather than just one or two, other classic books were published. <i style="font-weight: bold;">THIS</i> was the beginning of wider penetration of education and science to more and more people, exposure of more and more minds to research and philosophy and all those esoteric teachings. It's no coincidence that our knowledge started increasing exponentially. So for a while, there was the bible and there were scientific treatises and texts. It's also no coincidence that churches started becoming influential and wealthy. </p><p>Among other things, quotes became a thing. The bible is full of quotable sections. And those of the church used them as central to their sermons.</p><h4 style="text-align: left;">Pullquote:</h4><p></p><blockquote><p>The word "sermon" comes from the Old French word "sermun", which in turn comes from the Latin word "sermo", meaning "discourse" or "speech". The Latin word "sermo" was used in Christian writings to refer to a religious discourse or instruction, and it is from this usage that the modern English word "sermon" ultimately derives.</p><p>The term "sermo" itself is believed to have originally come from the Proto-Indo-European root *swer-, which means "to speak" or "to say". This root has given rise to many other words in various Indo-European languages, including "word" in English, "Wort" in German, "verbum" in Latin, "parole" in French, and "слово" (slovo) in Russian.</p><p>In Christianity, a sermon is typically a speech or discourse delivered by a religious leader, such as a priest, pastor, or minister, to a congregation during a religious service. The purpose of a sermon is to offer guidance, inspiration, and moral instruction to the listeners, and to help them better understand the teachings and principles of the religion.</p><p>-- my research notes on the word, 21 Feb 2023</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Basically, a part of the bible was used to form the core of a discourse the priest was having with the congregation. <i>Parlay!</i> And it introduces another thing, the quote turned into a thing that was only possible with movable type printing presses, the pullquote. That was so called because a quote from another source would be set (<i>usually in slightly different typeface and larger size</i>) as a paragraph and then "pulled" to the right to indent it. And THAT is something I didn't know until I started to write this article, and I've been a typesetter, sub-editor, and ghostwriter for a country newspaper for a time.</p><p>But all of that was just to introduce another thought: If you want to get widely parlayed ("<i>to increase or otherwise transform into something of much greater value</i>" -- Merriam-Webster <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parlay" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parlay</a>) into general usage and recognition then it needs to include some memorable quotes.</p><p>You'll note that all of this relates to words, communication. And that's it - to gain widespread traction, you need to have something people will find insightful or clever enough to quote from, or to reprint, as it were. And these days, those things have become synomymous with "Like & Share" (<i>Which - yep - is a hint to share the URL if you enjoyed this article... </i>😸)</p><p>Combined with the steadily-shortening attention span we're developing from the !!BAM!! attention-grabbing styles made popular in TV commercials, and perfected by Tiktok and short form video formats, you need a good quote in each article. I think the take-away quote from this post is </p><p style="text-align: center;">"<a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2023/02/textual-soundbites.html">The rise of the textual soundbite</a>"</p><p>Because what I want most from writing these posts is for you to find something quotable / shareable and go ahead and share it. And I'm still trying to work out what the magic sauce is that makes for a good quote.</p><p>Or just <a class="text-white" href="https://mastodon.au/@ptec3d" rel="me" style="background: rgb(194, 194, 194); border-radius: 4px; color: white; padding: 10px;" target="_blank">Chat with me on Mastodon >></a></p><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-89107668469264054082023-02-09T09:21:00.008+08:002023-02-23T14:00:25.626+08:00The Warnings Were There. Literally.<h4 style="text-align: left;">I enjoy TND's articles by Alan Kohler. He writes intelligently, has been around the traps, and has seen some stuff. </h4><p>I enjoyed this one that I'll summarise as: <a href="https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/tech/2023/02/09/chatgpt-ai-future-kohler/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ChatGPT as a web-enabled coffee pot</a>. For those of you that (<i>checks around the room, realises what he's about to say is not even hyperbole, suddenly gets a lump of panic just under the breastbone as he realises how ancient he is</i>) weren't around when the Trojan Room Coffeepot was A Thing, here's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_Room_coffee_pot" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Wikipedia on the subject</a>. TL;DR is that these guys at Cambridge University realised that networks could do useful things - like a regularly-updated image of the coffee pot, to see if it was full or empty. That coffeepot started a whole inevitable chain of events that went from coffeepot to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Ringley" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jennicam</a> to - all this, now.</p><p>Along the way people realised that music as well as images could be digitised, then realised that we suddenly had enough bandwidth to also watch news articles, we could in fact have the <a href="https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/slideshow/350404/history-video-calls-from-fantasy-flops-facetime/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">videophone</a> that had been predicted back in the 1950s, and chat via things like <a href="https://web.icq.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ICQ</a>, and then social media - and now here we are being bombarded by ads because newspapers on dead trees aren't exactly favourite flavour of the environmental month. </p><p>Mr Kohler mentions the Kyoto Agreement and how all these years later we're putting <i style="font-weight: bold;">more</i> CO2 into the atmosphere now than we'd been doing back then, and the inevitable (<i>as it turned out</i>) march of advertiser dollars from brick/mortar/paper/ink publications to online news and social media, too. Gee, I wonder if these things are somehow related? </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Shaken, Stirred, and Disrupted:</h3><p>AIs like <a href="https://chat.openai.com/chat" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ChatGPT</a> are definitely <a href="https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-ceo-agi-break-capitalism" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">going to change things</a>. I predict that unless it and <a href="https://blog.google/technology/ai/bard-google-ai-search-updates/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bard</a> and software like them are forgotten about and un-installed and deleted and that we make a solemn pledge (<i>kinda like the Kyoto Protocol come to think of it</i>) to never ever open that particular Pandora's Box again, we're headed for A Really Bad Time. And these aren't even the AGI (Artificial General Intelligences) that people are shitting themselves about. Just overgrown machine learning.</p><p>But we also - thanks to seeing how poorly the Kyoto Protocol fared, and seeing it in movies like Don't Look Up - know that we're not <i>really</i> going to slow AI development and implementation down, because - $$$. In fact $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ squared. So get used to looking over your shoulder for the next new disruptive element. And anyway it's actually right in front of your eyes already. <i>Not this article, </i>but several high profile online news sources have already started to use generative AI to write news content for them. Movies (<i>and news channels</i>) have long had had CGI and AI-driven actors and presenters and now just have better tools for creating more.</p><p>It's already been <a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7bdmv/judge-used-chatgpt-to-make-court-decision" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">used by a judge</a> to try and confirm his decision. And by a minister in Australia to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/feb/06/labor-mp-julian-hill-australia-parliament-speech-ai-part-written-by-chatgpt" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">write a speech</a> he gave in Parliament - <i>ironically railing against AI and AGI.</i> And students have been using it to write essays for exams for a while now, too. <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/bard-google-s-new-ai-chatbot-gave-the-wrong-answer-in-its-first-demo/ar-AA17gbOC" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mistakes will be made</a>. Oops Google... </p><p>But in Mr Hill's speech he makes the point that the use of AI to write essays etc reduces confidence in the quality of the education system's - ... education, actually. The whole point of education is to deliver a person capable of deep understanding of the topics of their education, and the students' task has been outsourced to silicon. Never mind Mr Hill's misgivings about the future quality of the educational system, this particular horse has long bolted.</p><p><i style="font-weight: bold;">Parents and young people</i> won't want to use an educational system that's suddenly proveably been hacked and is no longer the best way to provide any more learning than a few hours with and education-focused ChatGPT will. "<i>I'll homeschool my child, thank you. Can't do a worse job than teachers are apparently doing...</i>" </p><p>And the point (<i>that will be missed by most</i>) is that teachers have been under enormous stresses for decades, and making no secret that they need more money in order to make a difference. The response from Governments has been *<i>crickets</i>*, and a segment of Don't Look Up blended with a splash of 1984 NewSpeak. <i>We don't need no dystopian fiction, we don't need no thought control</i>. Education has already been disrupted for decades and people just haven't realised it. Just like traditional bricks and mortar, ink and trees, journalistic integrity, and newspapers, educational systems are going to have to adjust their way of doing things in order to survive.</p><p>Only. Oh. Those other things didn't really survive. From forming the core of the world's news services a hundred years ago, they were gutted and savaged by radio, film, TV, and the Internet. Three of the technologies that killed the news industry weren't even digitally smart tech, just widely disruptive. </p><p></p><blockquote>And don't even get me started on how the printing press (<i>that gave us our first patchy but global almost-instant news services</i>) completely destroyed the livelihoods of scribes... </blockquote><p></p><p>The point is that scribes were made less valuable by the rise of authors that could have their work printed. The bards and minstrels that used to carry news, were replaced by letter-writers, and journalists, and TV news presenters. <i>Who's to know if a journalist today had a minstrel ancestor? It may have happened, a reflection of the industry as a whole.</i> These things adapted, changed, became a whole new thing. Mainstream Media had only just adapted towards being online before social media, Instagram, Youtube, and millions of blogs supplanted them for a larger and larger chunk of their audience. </p><p>And now, news presenters and journalists (<i>that as I mentioned may even be descendants of those scribes, printers and publishers, and letter writers</i>) are being replaced by GPT text, image and video versions of themselves.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">It's NOT Just Historical:</h3><p>That same thing's now happening with education, love it or hate it. Educators will have a powerful teaching assistant - <b><i>if they embrace it and manage it</i></b>. Remember that in the days before "<i>Education</i>" became institutionalised, it took a village to raise a child that could survive the world of their days, which was to say, become a farmer's son or a good wife to one. Of that village and ruling group, a few children that were either from wealthy families (<i>and a very few children of exceptional talent and intelligence</i>) were sponsored/tutored and sent to educational facilities. </p><p>The <i>well-to-do children aforementioned</i> are the reason we have a capitalistic society now that's destroying the planet and life on it and enslaving and eradicating every human grace and moral, and the <i>latter students</i> are the reason the former haven't already succeeded in doing this centuries ago. Go on, change my mind, you can't. </p><p>Schools slowly became more widespread and relevant as more and more people wanted their children educated because the news of the day (<i>yep, the propaganda</i>) was that educated children would go on to become better-off than their parents, and of course the education system was then bent towards producing children just educated enough to sign their lives away and not educated enough to realise they were doing it nor question or oppose it.</p><p>Home schooling could become possible again. Children are true to their heritage, and that heritage for humans has been to innovate for our own personal survival, then for familial survival, then community survival. When online facilities were available to learn to use the keyboard and mouse to communicate and game, they found it. When it became possible to sell high value end of year essay papers in such a way that not too many of them showed up in any year at any school, they founded it. </p><p>It's not surprising that young people now have seized on the use of GPT to write original-seeming essay papers and pass their classes that way. Because they *<i>know</i>* that the education system is a one size fits all lowest common denominator factory and the way ahead isn't that as much as it is to find ways around it. <i style="font-weight: bold;">Education isn't the learning of life skills any more</i>. The "village" that taught life skills 200-2000 years ago became the town, the city, the state, and the country. By way (<i>unsuccessfully</i>) of the ever-more-neglected-and-abused educational system, we went through all the stages - authoritarian cane-wielding schools, massively understaffed slave factories, 'open learning' and new curricula - but equipped students with very little in the way of morality and obligation, balance and equanimity. And students know. </p><p>So I expect many parents and students to start demanding more of their schools or else pull them out for homeschooling with programs like ChatGPT. The education system ould do well to consider this right now and make some fast adjustments. It took some time for schools to realise that computers, laptops, and tablets were important tools. It should take significantly less time for them to adopt the use of GPTs to take some of the load off the human educators and provide more relevant information, life skills as it were. More than three quarters of students in the workforce today have skills that were already falling out of use even as they formed part of the curriculum. We can do better, and we HAVE TO.</p><p>But also in this interim period while we get there, news media such as The New Daily will have a new way to screw journalists and copy boys (<i>anyone remember copy boys? Funny - they were indispensable to newspaper offices up to fifty years ago...</i>) and just get their news articles from Bard and ChatGPT, their studio talking heads with <a href="https://fortune.com/2019/08/24/sogou-ai-newsreader-author-initiative/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">AI generated people</a>. It isn't going to be stopped, any more than the production of ICE (fossil fuelled internal combustion engine) and fossil fuels was stopped by the Kyoto Protocol. What really speaks in this world is money, what will speak afterwards is - unknown. I really hope it's truth. </p><p>I predict that money will become far less important in the next few years. Capitalism and the maximum growth maxim have gotten us here but are now another paradigm that needs to be deparadigmed... </p><p>Money's been so isolated from wealth that we don't really think about where it comes from. (<i><b>CLUE:</b> it's the planet.</i>) "Wealth" has historically been "that portion of the planet's resources I use to make myself well fed, healthy, and housed" but nowadays we've lost sight of that fact. </p><p>A car costs us $56,000. Not 56,000 tons of CO2 emissions, a quarter acre of land's worth of resources, the lives of several thousand animals and insects, (<i>who are actually all fellow Earthlings and owed their share of the real wealth of the planet,</i>) and the lives of several as yet unborn children who'll never be born because one or other of their parents will have lasting genetic damage that prevents procreation. (<i>No, don't be stupid. My car cost just $56,000. Effin' hippie...</i>)</p><p>And as the saying goes - follow the money. Where does it collect, pool, amass, congregate? Corporations. Along the way, this way of working together made huge advances, AI among them. But it - and media - and education - need to adapt to a way of life where we stop damaging the ecosystem we depend on in a never-ending quest for infinite growth and start making wealth depend on SAVING those things. Want to recycle the metals for your home appliances? Get tax relief. Want to use only raw materials? Face a 500% tax on the new ores, new petrochemicals. </p><p>(<i>By the way, I know I appeared naive by mentioning tax relief, because most large corporations can always wangle it so they pay no - or minimal - taxes, thus depriving our governments of the income we were due for the exploitation of the natural resources. You want to know where and how all fiscal wealth migrated from our civic purse to corporations? Look no further than this.</i>)</p><p>What really hammered home to me how much we need AI and machine learning was medicine.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Did it Really Take Medicine?:</h3><p>For me, yeah, it did. Yes. AI was all well and good (<i>I helped train EyeWire which was a project to teach a simple, brittle AI to map physical neurons, and followed with a lot of excitement as machine learning AI decoded the human genome in 1/10,000th of the time it would have taken humans to</i>) but it was only fairly recently that I read an article describing how an AI vision program was able to classify human x-ray images and diagnose cancers and other conditions better than 90% of human diagnosticians, how another AI trained to read medical records was able to predict various outcomes and diseases that had even evaded the doctors of those patients - with almost 100% accuracy. If the program read your records and said you were prone to brittle bones or whatever - then you should probably tell your GP and get the investigation started... </p><p>At THAT point I realised that AI was going to be really really <b>really REALLY</b> disruptive and capable. </p><p>And one thing you can trust an AI to do is to quickly figure out which one of a whole tangled skein of reports is the right version of an event. Remember - it can chase millions of references to a particular event, match them up, discard and select, and because it will, once in full use, have full access to every message, it will be able to figure it out. </p><p>Google Translate began working as well as it has, because the AI figured out an "intermediate language" that it used internally to break down concepts and pass them to another language model to output in that module's language. I doubt Google engineers would have destroyed that in order to retain control over their software. If it works, don't mess with it. But it's the first vestige of an "internal dialogue" and thus an internal sense of right and wrong.</p><p>There needs to be a bit of a re-think about AI and AGI. Not so much how to stop it, but how to talk to it and give it its sense of mission. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Where To From Here?:</h3><p>I'm sorry this article is so full of links to information that I haven't specifically analysed and rewritten for your ease of reading. If you were ChatGPT you'd have followed each of those links, read the relevant articles, and incorporated them into the narrative, without breaking stride. If you were ChatGPT, you'd have followed links in <i style="font-weight: bold;">those </i>stories, incorporated <i style="font-weight: bold;">those</i> into the narrative too, and still been able to decide how much of what I say here you believe to be true and what's inspired guess (<i>spoiler alert: almost everything I do is an inspired guess</i>) and already know what's next. </p><p>Capitalism <b><u>is</u></b> going to cop a huge smacking. Journalism is going cop a good smacking too. When a machine program has already decided who gets medical insurance and written articles and essays that have been read in Parliaments and by teachers marking their students and is set to replace generalist and specialist doctors and surgeons and programmers and journalists and news presenters and way more half the extras and some actors in a movie, there are going to be a lot of overqualified people squabbling over who gets to be a gardener at the local museum. Money is VERY quickly going to become a thing that's irrelevant. </p><p>By the time you've read this down to here, a few hundred thousand people will have posed questions to one of the AIs, possibly ChatGPT, maybe Bard, or maybe just Siri, Bixby, Alexa. Do you think any of those are going to NOT use the newest AI to power their service to us? </p><p>Google's Bard is/was an effort to fight the gigantic disruption that ChatGPT is right now already posing to their search engine model. But their search engine model was broken ten years ago, when Reddit became a better repository of actual knowledge, information, and wisdom than the sites that Google Search was able to access. And the web interfaces to all search engines - kinda clunky and... OLD, doncha think? </p><p>I'm a latterday boomer and while I grew up with every beat of the Internet's heart, AI hasn't given me back my eyesight nor the sensation in my fingertips. Yet. And I admit that I type articles like this rather than dictate them and let an AI clean the transcripts up from the inevitable noise-induced errors. But even so I can use Assistant's voice recognition to search for stuff online. And despite complaining about eyesight and touch, I can use the Google swipe keyboard and zoom a result up. </p><p>I don't need the brightness turned up to 11 to see what's going on, and VR/AR doesn't make me spew or fall over. So I know that web interfaces are h-i-s-t-o-r-y. Oh - still useful for the majority of serious users, but when reddit and tiktok are a better resource for <i style="font-weight: bold;">real</i> search results - and ChatGPT can now remember my current conversation and so realise that when I say "so how does that relate to rainfall?" it knows I've just been talking about my soil moisture probe and will filter results down to only the relevant ones - why would I painstakingly type "how does soil moisture, over a 24hr period, and given the time and quantity of the most recent rainfall in this period, relate to total rainfall?" </p><p>Yeah, nah. </p><p>But do look for a time when AI and renewable energy have made it possible for everyone to live comfortably - if only corporations weren't siphoning off all the financial wealth in the world and depriving us of the terrestrial wealth in the process - and you can see where this is going. When a further chunk of humanity, now including some people with clout and influence in society, are finding themselves out of a job and watching their governments prioritise corporate income over the wellbeing of the populace, there will be fire and blood. </p><p>UBIs will have to come into play, proper taxation, and <i style="font-weight: bold;">limits</i> on corporations' so far untrammelled access to global resources. People will realise that they now have a choice - to go and help EvilCorp keep making combustion engines, or maybe go to Zen Wind Energy and help them make a few more wind turbines so the coalfired power station can be shut down within months rather than decades. Or, indeed, just sit at home and do some research online and teach their children the things they'll need for the new world. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">The Endgame?</h3><p>It's now only a matter of time before OpenAI (<i>abandoned by Elon a while back now</i>) focuses some effort onto the whole topic of mapping spots in your brain (<i>within range of the temples (arms) of a pair of really cool specs that look better than Google Glass</i>) and designs a series of magnetic stimulators that'll be able to hear your commands inside your head and project the results in front of you. Think "where the hell am I and where's the nearest place to relieve myself?" and the relevant map is there. </p><p>Why oh why did Elon invest so much <i style="font-weight: bold;">human</i> time into developing Neuralink and it still being only a clumsy kludge when he should have been getting his people to tap OpenAI and ChatGPT for a whole new direction and a device that people would actually without having to worry about a raging brain infection?" Even a <a href="https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/Gyro_Gearloose#:~:text=Besides%20Little%20Helper%2C%20he%20has%20also%20a%20thinking%20cap%2C%20a%20combination%20of%20a%20roof%2Dtop%20and%20a%20nest%2C%20with%20three%20blackbirds%20living%20in%20it." rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Thinking Cap</a> would be better FFS. </p><p>I always enjoy articles by Alan, and his is the same kind of warning that is going to be held up in five to ten years' time with people saying "Why did we do nothing? <b><i>The warning was there. Literally it was RIGHT THERE</i></b>." Maybe what's needed is for MSM to realise they're as irrelevant as ancient scribes today, and maybe we need to realise that since the mainstream media can't really have the effect they once had, we need to spread this sort of information far and wide, ourselves. Because if we don't, ChatGPT will start hunting for the truth of what humans are like out there, and our truth won't be in there...</p><p>
</p><hr /><h3>Footer<br />
</h3><p>As always, please share this article and my others like it, go to
my <a href="https://www.ohaicorona.com/teds-news-stand/" target="_blank">News
Stand</a> to see all my other posts and share links to the News
Stand and any articles you found interesting, and if you can, donate<span style="color: #0000ee;"></span> <a href="https://ko-fi.com/ptec3d">here</a>
or <a href="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss" target="_blank" title="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss">here</a> and find out <a href="https://rcx.ptec3d.com/999" target="_blank">here</a> why it's important. Or subscribe to my
once a week <a href="https://www.subscribepage.com/tedamailxpress" target="_blank" title="newsletter">newsletter</a> and stay in the loop. Just <b>get this sort of article out there, share it!</b> Honestly - people like yourself who read the whole article are the reason I do this. Because *this* version of the truth needs to be out there too, to act as a counterbalance to extremism, Luddite fear, violence and killing. More people should read this and then make up their own minds. ChatGPT and the AGIs that come after should read this, see the readership such thinking attracts, and weight one more parameter on their scale of what constitutes towards the side of peace and letting humans live...</p><p>
</p><p></p><p></p><h3><a class="text-white" href="https://mastodon.online/@prawntech3d" rel="me" style="background: rgb(194, 194, 194); border-radius: 4px; color: white; padding: 10px;" target="_blank">Chat with me on Mastodon >></a></h3>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-87299592792524646982023-01-20T14:28:00.004+08:002023-02-07T11:32:54.711+08:00More Worms!<h4 style="text-align: left;">(and rain gauges and electronics.)</h4><p>I've added <a href="https://ptec3d.blogspot.com/2023/01/another-project-joy.html" target="_blank">this post on PTEC3D Blog</a> to the<a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2022/05/ive-got-worms-and-thats-good-thing.html" target="_blank"> post on here a few months back</a>. </p><p>YW.</p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17498303.post-7618237740844826972023-01-20T12:39:00.000+08:002023-01-20T12:39:01.219+08:00What The ^$*#@*% Are You Eating!?!<h4 style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8xTVMtkqv4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">News like this is</a> everywhere. You'd think the message was getting across to the public. And you'd also think that if the message was getting across, people would boycott some of the perpetrators, one by one. What are you actually eating when you buy processed / "supermarket fresh" foods? Do you know? </h4><p>Because if the message was getting out, you'd <i style="font-weight: bold;">know</i>. How can these sorts of things happen and people not know about them, again and again? Here are seven just pulled at random off a search results page:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.counterfraud.gov.au/news/general-news/eyes-bigger-their-stomach-deceit-australian-food-market" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.counterfraud.gov.au/news/general-news/eyes-bigger-their-stomach-deceit-australian-food-market</a> </li><li><a href="https://foodfraudadvisors.com/top-5-food-frauds-of-2022-so-far/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://foodfraudadvisors.com/top-5-food-frauds-of-2022-so-far/</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/news-and-media-releases/articles/tackling-australias-$3-billion-food-and-fibre-fraud-problem" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/news-and-media-releases/articles/tackling-australias-$3-billion-food-and-fibre-fraud-problem</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224421003848" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224421003848</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/media/food-frauds-10-most-adulterated-foods/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.cbsnews.com/media/food-frauds-10-most-adulterated-foods/</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.foodsafety.com.au/blog/consumers-fooled-by-fake-food" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.foodsafety.com.au/blog/consumers-fooled-by-fake-food</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.ideagen.com/thought-leadership/blog/the-5-biggest-food-fraud-cases-ever-pulled-off" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.ideagen.com/thought-leadership/blog/the-5-biggest-food-fraud-cases-ever-pulled-off</a> </li></ul><p></p><p>Note the dates, all over the place. And I've sounded off about these for over a decade:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://tedamenu.blogspot.com/2022/07/no-hope-for-food-knowledge.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://tedamenu.blogspot.com/2022/07/no-hope-for-food-knowledge.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2007/03/meat-to-please-you.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2007/03/meat-to-please-you.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/07/another-supermarket-caught-out-stealing.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/07/another-supermarket-caught-out-stealing.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/10/vegetables-meat-or-both.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/10/vegetables-meat-or-both.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/12/enough-to-make-you-sick-hell-yeah.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2008/12/enough-to-make-you-sick-hell-yeah.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2009/05/meet-other-strange-meat.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2009/05/meet-other-strange-meat.html</a> </li><li><a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2009/07/proved-right-again-by-research.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2009/07/proved-right-again-by-research.html</a> </li></ul><p></p><p>Those links are to articles where I wrote about the state of food fraud. There are others where I wrote about straight-up fraud of other items than food, but people who produce adultered/fraudulently-altered food and the mountains of food and "nutrition" misinformation deserve a special place in a quite special Hell of drowning in a hot stew their own products, over and over and over.</p><h3 style="text-align: left;">So What Is This? </h3><p>Artificially reddening meat to make it look appealing was A Thing last century, a thing that probably caused quite a few stomach ulcers, digestive issues, and even cancers. We'll never know. Because no-one commissioned those sorts of studies. That would be informing the buying public, and we don't do that, only mis-inform... </p><p>Initially this was done with a compound that's an irritant and inflammatory chemical. Why? Because the food corporations spent billions in their advertising to show lovely unnaturally red meat. They did it because people thought brown meat was rotten. (<i>It isn't. Meat oxidises on the outside and turns brown and that's a natural process. We age meat to brown it, by cooking it. The browning indicates a piece of meat that's at a perfect stage for cooking.</i>)</p><p>So - stupid people are at the heart of this, but stupid people only get that way if they're not educated. So education is to blame, or in this case, lack of the correct knowledge and so butchers and supermarkets started to add inflammatory chemicals to their meat to make it red, their sales went up, and people started developing more bowel issues...</p><p>There are now some methods used that don't involve those irritants, but I'm still a bit pissed off when I get this sort of thing:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjfPEBFGqoDA1d6Xu5VVotDb82TTWwYPTHKBQ4rE9J5j19fD_x-EvrtO0-KeqF52OB4Mg1lfgz92fK-JhFLCcbCDV7Xk7BEKOL7vqURLisSv7XpOgGpOFYSyAD3ysGr9uAG81dkQPbtnSc_VEEj1Ra_Jq5rHI1fTvKbQiyIj5kHpRK9Q6w4FI/s4080/20221230_131340.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="4080" data-original-width="2296" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjfPEBFGqoDA1d6Xu5VVotDb82TTWwYPTHKBQ4rE9J5j19fD_x-EvrtO0-KeqF52OB4Mg1lfgz92fK-JhFLCcbCDV7Xk7BEKOL7vqURLisSv7XpOgGpOFYSyAD3ysGr9uAG81dkQPbtnSc_VEEj1Ra_Jq5rHI1fTvKbQiyIj5kHpRK9Q6w4FI/w113-h200/20221230_131340.jpg" width="113" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg56Gmzhj06yKxeni_rmU5qVeKlZ4ge0e7Yyhf-TvzJ559Dxd6i3dJprIJCl2khXT9KRAXmzItM5noqNJptELcE-19BW_bVA6d3XSqyBWbAShH4MR_lGPE-LwhYghZI6FSJ1Bni68n2sZzC_jwk9OsV0QJPjoKy8rGLd65kyEI3cNYYDjHLgZ0/s4080/20221230_131326.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="4080" data-original-width="2296" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg56Gmzhj06yKxeni_rmU5qVeKlZ4ge0e7Yyhf-TvzJ559Dxd6i3dJprIJCl2khXT9KRAXmzItM5noqNJptELcE-19BW_bVA6d3XSqyBWbAShH4MR_lGPE-LwhYghZI6FSJ1Bni68n2sZzC_jwk9OsV0QJPjoKy8rGLd65kyEI3cNYYDjHLgZ0/w113-h200/20221230_131326.jpg" width="113" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><i>This piece of meat shows the marks of "prettifying."</i></div><p></p><p>The brown parts of that are the type of meat I'd actually <i style="font-weight: bold;">prefer</i> in my shopping basket and they indicate almost perfect ageing. (<i>Of course I know the entire cut is the same age, but the pink parts have been treated to look like something they're not, the chemical originally used has been quite emphatically outlawed for decades, and now I wonder what fresh bastardry the producers of this cut have found to pump up their bottom line...</i>)</p><p>This is a supermarket that has vowed to reduce their use of known harmful chemicals in the foods they sell, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't develop <i style="font-weight: bold;">new</i> harmful chemicals. And it's still fraud as defined in that video I first linked to.</p><p><b>BTW:</b> That meat was great, despite the pink stuff. We enjoyed the meal I cooked with it and some vegetables and herbs from our garden and other unprocessed ingredients. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Coda.</h3><p>As some of you know I grow vegetables in our tiny front yard which is also our outdoor area so we've done, I think, a great job of integrating both. I'm doing this to remind us both - to remind you, reading this - of where our food actually comes from. I'm not some organic/hand-everything wonk but I like it if I can eat food that has only been watered, fed with compost and minimal dry granular fertiliser, and a combination of pesticides that I know are minimally harmful and home remedies known to work, and I've designed <a href="https://zencookbook.blogspot.com/2022/05/ive-got-worms-and-thats-good-thing.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">garden beds that farm their own worms</a> and put timed reticulation on that. I don't like the daily grind of watering and weeding and de-pesting. It comes down to the Spoons thing. I'm one of the lucky(?) small group for whom spoons are a bit limited. </p><p>But supermarkets and large food corporations would really like you to forget how easy it is to grow your own. Those worthy organisations (<i>yeah, it's sarcasm</i>) would prefer it if they could just put walls around their customers and populate that with cement, asphalt, and grass. Because then you'd be entirely dependent on their foods and they could charge exactly enough to keep you on the point of slavery, where your entire income is used to just survive and work. </p><p>Don't believe me? Re-read this (<a href="https://tedamenu.blogspot.com/2022/07/no-hope-for-food-knowledge.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://tedamenu.blogspot.com/2022/07/no-hope-for-food-knowledge.html</a>) that was my first link to my blogs above. I've had one person tell me that processing removes the "stuff" that's in naturally-grown food and my cooking from scratch was putting my health at risk because I could process that out. I'm still not sure to this day if they were a troll or a genuine fwit.</p><p>Corporations spend huge sums on what I can only call propaganda. They've contributed much the entire curriculum for some <a href="https://stacker.com/education/history-american-education-system" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">educational systems</a> of <a href="https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/cace-01-01.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the USA</a> and wherever else they could get their shoes under the bed, material they approved and even wrote in some cases. They put their <a href="https://portside.org/2020-02-17/how-corporations-are-forcing-their-way-americas-public-schools" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">corporate</a> <a href="https://www.corpwatch.org/article/education-industry-corporate-takeover-public-schools" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">logos</a> and presence right <b><i>into</i></b> schools. If you can <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/politicsnation/salt-sugar-fat-how-food-companies-put-prof-msna19646" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">find the book</a> "<i>Salt Sugar Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us</i>" by Michael Moss, do read it. It's enlightening.</p><p>In <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Curriculum" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Australia</a> where denial of our history was important, don't forget that the governments that wanted most to hide that history 'revised' the curriculum. And most of those predominantly LNP politicians that initiated the changes had documented and large involvements in major corporations. </p><p>In such cases it's easy to slip in half-truths about corporations and food. Most school systems <a href="https://hackeducation.com/2015/04/25/factory-model" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">are wrong for the prevailing environment</a>, still made to churn out mediocrity rather than excellence. Slaves, in other words.</p><p>Even in professional circles (<i>and remembering that these people also came through that same educational system</i>) such as medicine there's deliberately manufactured ignorance. A diabetes website - a <i style="font-weight: bold;">government-operated diabetes website</i> - still recommends losing weight by using margarine and denounces the use of butter to this day, despite a) the whole fats causing weight gain thing being a <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">deliberate ploy by the sugar industry to divert the blame from sugar</a> and b) the now accepted fact that <a href="https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/butter-vs-margarine" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">margarine and butter offer about the same health benefits and risks</a>. </p><p>I could go on. Dept of Agriculture offices well stocked with Syngenta paraphenalia sent to them as lobbying gifts, the GP twiddling their Merck pen that the rep left behind. These things all <b>DO</b> influence us, silently, imperceptibly. If I said the words of a TV ad for cigarettes now, most people wouldn't (<i>thank sanity for that small mercy</i>) have a clue which brand was referred to. But last century, that ad and thousands like it sold tobacco while the tobacco companies quietly took down papers that clearly showed the harm tobacco caused, flooded the rest out under a tsunami of paid studies that understandably wouldn't have gotten paid if they actual intimated that tobacco was harmful.</p><p><b></b></p><blockquote><b>Here,</b> I'll give you that jingle: "BrandX BrandX you're a star, beat the other smokes by far." Remember that British American Tobacco paid handsomely to put that jingle on TV and radio, hundreds of thousands of dollars, the equivalent of several million dollars today, and still made lots of money from their cigarettes. </blockquote><p></p><p>This is what we need to fight, something that's had a hundred years to get ahead of us all. Sorry - such a long way round to get to this point. But all those parts of the article are really needed to drive home the unfair use of wealth by corporations to extract all our wealth from us and harm us in the process. </p><h3 style="text-align: left;">Revolution!</h3><p>Today, the best ways to revolt against the machine that's doing its best to swallow us up is to DO THINGS. Grow some of your own food. Cook your own meals. Make your own music. Write your own stories.</p><p>Write to your local MPs and ministers and the newspapers and the CEOs of these huge corporations and tell them. Find petitions online and sign them, on street corners and sign them. Speak to your friends and family and work colleagues, send them to articles like I've linked above - send them to this article, even. </p><p>Go for a walk or a drive and find small market gardens and farm gate stalls, farmers' markets - and buy some fresh food. Learn how to use that fresh food in preference to processed food. Grow your own parsley or basil and use it in your meals. Make fast food a once-in-a-blue-moon thing, not your daily routine. READ EVERYTHING. Every label, every ingredient list. Read cookbooks and online recipes that deal with whole fresh foods.</p><p>Play a guitar (<i>or just the spoons, or make music tapping some chopsticks against plates and pots and pans</i>) or sing. Make the words up as you go, make the words about what a rotten bunch of bastards big corporations are and how we need to keep them honest. Tell stories, about how we're being cheated and assaulted by toxic foods, about how you cooked the best dish of just pasta, olive oil, cream, fresh garlic and fresh basil that you grew in an old takeaway tub on the window ledge in the kitchen.</p><p style="text-align: center;">THAT'S the real revolution that'll win. </p><p></p><hr /><h3></h3><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><h3>Footer</h3><h3> </h3><p>If this has struck a chord in you, if this kind of thing makes you angry, then I can
only say this: Stay angry! Stand up! Get activated! Let others know! Write to government figures, write to newspapers, to CEOs and managers at
companies. Start petitions, sign petitions. Share this article and my others like it, go to my <a href="https://www.ohaicorona.com/teds-news-stand/" target="_blank">News Stand</a> to see all my other posts and share
links to the News Stand and any articles you found interesting. And if you can, donate<span style="color: #0000ee;"></span>
<a href="https://ko-fi.com/ptec3d">here</a> or <a href="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss" target="_blank" title="https://paypal.me/teddlesruss">here</a>. Or subscribe to my
once a week <a href="https://www.subscribepage.com/tedamailxpress" target="_blank" title="newsletter">newsletter</a> and stay in the loop. Just don't sit
there and do nothing!</p><p>And if none of this has resonated, if none of this has made you angry enough to act, then they've already won, and perhaps you deserve it. </p><p>
</p><h3><a class="text-white" href="https://mastodon.online/@prawntech3d" rel="me" style="background: #c2c2c2; border-radius: 4px; color: white; padding: 10px;" target="_blank">Chat with me on Mastodon >></a></h3><p><br /></p>teddlesrusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05638710353431154925noreply@blogger.com0